This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
SUMMARY
- TALVEY is not approved by the regulatory agencies for the treatment of patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL).
- Johnson & Johnson does not recommend the use of TALVEY in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved labeling.
- MonumenTAL-1 is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1
- Per protocol, patients with PCL (>2 x 109/L plasma cells by standard differential), were excluded from enrollment.1,2
- Gaballa et al (2026)3 published a multicenter, retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), including TALVEY and TECVAYLI, in 122 patients with PCL from 15 United States (US) academic centers.
- Bernardi et al (2024)4 presented the clinical course of a 40-year-old male with primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL) who was treated with TALVEY as 5th line therapy.
- Other relevant literature has been identified in addition to the data summarized above.5,6
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Gaballa et al (2026)3 published a multicenter, retrospective Multiple Myeloma (MM) Immunotherapy Consortium study evaluating the efficacy and safety of BsAbs, including TECVAYLI and TALVEY, in patients with PCL.
Study Design/Methods
- This study included patients with primary and secondary PCL from 15 US academic centers who were treated with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)- or G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-directed BsAbs, including TECVAYLI, elranatamab, or TALVEY.
- Patients received TALVEY either as definitive line of therapy (TALVEY LOT) or as bridge to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T; TALVEY Bridge)
- PCL was defined as ≥5% circulating plasma cells (CPCs) in the peripheral blood, and included primary PCL, secondary PCL, historical PCL, and active PCL.
- Primary PCL was defined as disease arising de novo.
- Secondary PCL was defined as disease evolving from pre-existing MM and CPCs ≥5% for the first time at BsAb initiation, in the setting of previously diagnosed MM without prior history of PCL.
- Active PCL was defined as active disease within 30 days of BsAb initiation.
- Historical PCL was defined as disease that developed at any time from initial diagnosis through the last LOT prior to BsAb.
- Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression‑free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
- Secondary endpoints included incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and the incidence of infections during follow-up.
Results
Treatment Disposition, Baseline Demographics, and Disease Characteristics
- A total of 122 patients with PCL who were treated with BsAbs from 15 US centers were included in this study (27% primary PCL, 73% secondary PCL, 49% active PCL, 48% historical PCL, and 3% prior PCL with unknown disease status at treatment initiation). See Table: Baseline Characteristics for additional details.
Baseline Characteristics3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
Median age, years (range)
| 65 (31-83)
| 66 (31-83)
| 66 (39-73)
| 64 (46-83)
| 65 (40-75)
| 0.85
|
Men, %
| 48
| 56
| 46
| 43
| 38
| 0.57
|
Race, %
|
White
| 77
| 76
| 85
| 76
| 77
| 0.68
|
Black
| 15
| 18
| 0
| 16
| 15
|
Others
| 8
| 6
| 15
| 8
| 8
|
PCL status at the time of BsAb initiation, n
|
Active
| 49
| 49
| 69
| 51
| 23
| 0.13
|
Historical
| 48
| 42
| 31
| 49
| 77
| 0.09
|
Unknowna
| 3
| 9
| 0
| 0
| 0
| -
|
PCL subtype, n
|
Primary
| 27
| 24
| 15
| 33
| 23
| 0.54
|
Secondary
| 73
| 76
| 85
| 67
| 77
| 0.54
|
Highrisk cytogenetics, %
|
Del(17p)
| 34
| 23
| 54
| 40
| 25
| 0.13
|
t(4:14)
| 20
| 16
| 31
| 15
| 42
| 0.12
|
t(14:16)
| 11
| 9
| 23
| 10
| 8
| 0.55
|
1q gain/amp
| 50
| 39
| 77
| 51
| 58
| 0.09
|
Del(1p)
| 14
| 14
| 31
| 12
| 0
| 0.16
|
High bone marrow burdenb
| 45
| 38
| 64
| 53
| 20
| 0.13
|
Extramedullary disease, %
|
Paraskeletal
| 7
| 7
| 8
| 8
| 8
| 0.97
|
True
| 20
| 16
| 23
| 24
| 15
|
CNS involvement, %
| 5
| 2
| 15
| 6
| 0
| 0.21
|
Prior therapies
|
Median prior LOTs, n (IQR)
| 6 (4-8)
| 5 (4-7)
| 5 (4-6)
| 6 (5-9)
| 4 (4-5)
| -
|
Triplerefractory, %
| 94
| 88
| 92
| 98
| 100
| 0.17
|
Pentarefractory, %
| 57
| 53
| 54
| 68
| 25
| 0.05
|
Prior transplant, %
| 73
| 73
| 62
| 80
| 54
| 0.2
|
Prior BCMAdirected therapyc, %
| 57
| 42
| 38
| 82
| 23
| <0.01
|
BsAb usage, n
|
Monotherapy
| 94
| 100
| 92
| 90
| 92
| 0.21
|
Combination with other agents
| 6
| 0
| 8
| 10
| 8
|
Abbreviations: BCMA, Bcell maturation antigen; BsAb, bispecific antibody; CNS, central nervous system; IQR, interquartile range; LOT, line of therapy; PCL, plasma cell leukemia. aFour patients had a known history of PCL but unknown disease status at the time of BsAb initiation. bHigh bone marrow burden was defined as ≥50% involvement by malignant plasma cells. cTALVEY group, 70%; BCMA-BsAb group, 41%.
|
Treatment Exposure
- Patients were treated across 4 BsAb cohorts:
- TECVAYLI: 37% (n=45)
- TALVEY LOT: 42% (n=51)
- TALVEY as a bridge to CAR-T: 11% (n=13)
- Elranatamab: 11% (n=13)
- BsAbs were administered as monotherapy in 94% of patients and in combination with other agents (including pomalidomide [4%], bortezomib [1%], and chemotherapy [1%]) in 6% of patients.
- A majority of the patients receiving TALVEY were treated with the 0.8 mg/kg every-2-week regimen (96% in the TALVEY LOT cohort and 91% in the TALVEY bridge cohort), whereas only 4% and 9%, respectively, received the 0.4 mg/kg weekly schedule.
Efficacy
- Among 110 overall evaluable patients, survival outcomes varied significantly by treatment cohort at a median follow-up of 8.3 months.
Active PCL Subgroup
- Among 60 with active PCL at the time of BsAb initiation, survival differed significantly by therapy in favor of TALVEY LOT (P<0.001 for PFS and P=0.002 for OS).
- Median PFS was 3.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-7.9), and the median OS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 0-13).
- Efficacy response in the evaluable patients with active PCL is shown in Table: Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Active PCL at the Time of BsAb Initiation.
- Among patients with active PCL, PFS did not differ significantly with primary vs secondary PCL (8.8 months [95% CI, 0-18] vs 1.6 months [95% CI, 1-2.2]; P=0.15).
- Among patients with active PCL, OS did not differ significantly with primary vs secondary PCL (12.2 months [95% CI, not calculable] vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 2.5-7.9]; P=0.054).
Historical PCL Subgroup
- Among 58 patients with historical PCL, no significant differences in survival were observed between primary (n=25) and secondary PCL (n=33).
- Median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI, 0-4.9) vs 5.8 months (95% CI, 2-9.6) for primary vs secondary historical PCL (P=0.2).
- Median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-15.2) vs 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2-13.6) for primary vs secondary historical PCL (P=0.85).
- Survival outcomes in the evaluable patients with historical PCL are shown in Table: Survival Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Historical PCL.
- Among patients with historical vs active PCL, median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 1.8-7) vs 1.6 months (95% CI, 0.4-2.8; P=0.036) and median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI, 5.8-15.6) vs 5.3 months (95% CI, 0-10.7; P=0.004).
Multivariable Analysis
- Active PCL was associated with worse PFS (P=0.02; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.02) and OS (P=0.02; HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.12-4.87).
- TALVEY LOT was associated with improved PFS (P=0.01; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.21-0.79) and OS (P=0.01; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.19-0.82).
- TALVEY bridge was associated with improved PFS (P=0.05; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01) and OS (P=0.11; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.07-1.33) without reaching statistical significance for both PFS and OS.
Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in Overall Population3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
ORR, %
| 61
| 58
| 33
| 46
| 71
|
CR
| 22
| 17
| 20
| 39
| -
|
VGPR
| 24
| 8
| 4
| -
| 43
|
PR
| 16
| 33
| 9
| 8
| 29
|
Median PFS (95% CI), months
| 5.5 (3.5-7.5)
| NR
| 1.2 (0.7-1.7)
| 1.6c (0-4.3)
| 1.2 (0.3-2.1)e
|
Median OS (95% CI), months
| 11.5 (7.2-15.8)
| NR
| 8.1 (3.2-13)
| 3.6d (2.8-4.4)
| 3.4 (0-10.5)f
|
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; LOT, line of therapy; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response. aDay 30 pre-CAR-T response. bIncludes pomalidomide, bortezomib, or chemotherapy. cP=0.007 dP=0.023 eP=0.003 fP=0.001
|
Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Active PCL at the Time of BsAb Initiation3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
ORR, %
| 71
| 67
| 28
| 33
| -
|
CR
| 21
| -
| 17
| 22
| -
|
VGPR
| 21
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
PR
| 29
| 67
| 11
| 11
| -
|
Median PFS, months (95% CI)
| 6.9 (2.6-11.2)
| 3.2 (0-7.9)
| 0.7 (0.2-1.1)
| 1 (0-2.1)
| 0.7 (0.1-1.5)
|
Median OS, months (95% CI)
| 12.2 (8.1-16.3)
| 5.2 (0-13)
| 1.4 (0.7-2.1)
| 3.1 (0-7.8)
| 1.4 (0.8-2)
|
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; LOT, line of therapy; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PCL, plasma cell leukemia; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response. aDay 30 pre-CAR-T response. One patient died 9 days after initiation of BsAb therapy before receiving CAR T-cell therapy, whereas the other two patients subsequently received CAR T-cell infusion.
|
Survival Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Historical PCLa,3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|
Median PFS, months (95% CI)
| 3.7 (1.9-5.4)
| NR
| 2.3 (0.5-4.1)
| NR
| 5.2 (1-9.3)
|
Median OS, months (95% CI)
| 10.4 (5.1-15.7)
| NR
| 10.7 (6.2-15.2)
| 8.5
| 8.5 (7.7-9.3)
|
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CI, confidence interval; LOT, line of therapy; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PCL, plasma cell leukemia; PFS, progression-free survival. aDefined asabsence of active PCL within 30 days of BsAb initiation (n=58). bDay 30 pre-CAR-T response.
|
Safety
- The median hospitalization duration was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8-15).
- CRS was reported as grade 1 in 41%, grade 2 in 14.8%, grade 3 in 2.5%, and grade 4 in 1.6% of patients.
- ICANS was reported as grade 1 in 8.2%, grade 2 in 7.4%, grade 3 in 3.3%, and grade 4 in 1.6% of patients.
- Of the patients who experienced grade 3-4 ICANS (4.9%, n=6), 3 received TECVAYLI, 2 received TALVEY, and 1 received elranatamab.
- CRS and ICANS events per PCL status are summarized in Table: CRS and ICANS According to PCL Status at BsAb Initiation.
- Infections were reported in 34% of patients, including grade 1-2 in 20% and grade ≥3 in 14% of patients.
- Among patients with infections, viral infections were reported in 40% (n=219), bacterial infections in 36%, fungal infections in 10%, and mixed-pathogen infections in 14% of patients.
- Infection-related deaths were reported in 4% of patients (n=5) receiving BsAbs and included pneumonia, sepsis, and bacteremia.
- No deaths were attributed to CRS or ICANS.
CRS and ICANS According to PCL Status at BsAb Initiation3
|
|
|
|
|---|
CRS
|
Grade 1-2
| 29 (48.3)
| 36 (62.1)
| 0.15
|
Grade 3-4
| 4 (6.7)
| 1 (1.7)
| 0.36
|
ICANS
|
Grade 1-2
| 11 (18.3)
| 8 (13.8)
| 0.62
|
Grade 3-4
| 3 (5)
| 3 (5.2)
| 1
|
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; PCL, plasma cell leukemia. aP values were calculated using Fisher's exact test.
|
CASE REPORT
Bernardi et al (2024)4 presented the clinical course of a 40yearold male with pPCL who was treated with TALVEY as 5th-line therapy.
- Upon diagnosis of pPCL, the patient presented with bone pain with severe anemia (7.6 g/dL hemoglobin), thrombopenia at 16 g/L, white blood cells count at 15.1 g/L with 47% circulating plasma cells, hypercalcemia, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and β2‑microglobulin, an immunoglobulin A (IgA)-lambda of 31.6 g/L, free lambda light chains of 6,730 mg/L, and 80% bone marrow plasma cell infiltration. Chromosomal karyotyping revealed a complex karyotype with 17p13.1 loss and t(14;16), and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) revealed increased gastric and bone marrow activity. Gastric biopsy confirmed gastric infiltration by monoclonal plasma cells.
- The patient had received 4 prior lines of therapy before initiating TALVEY as 5th line treatment. The 4 prior lines of therapy included:
- Four cycles of KRD (carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) with weekly DARZALEX FASPRO added to cycles 3 and 4.
- Two cycles of VP-DACE (dexamethasone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, bortezomib, pomalidomide).
- Autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) with pomalidomide maintenance, followed by one cycle of PVD (bortezomib, dexamethasone, and pomalidomide)
- Five cycles of elranatamab.
- Fifth-line therapy with TALVEY was started using sub-cutaneous (SC) step-up dosing of 0.01 mg/kg (day 1), 0.06 mg/kg (day 3), and 0.4 mg/kg (days 5 and 7), during which the patient developed grade 1 CRS requiring intravenous (IV) tocilizumab 8 mg/kg.
- After 2 cycles of TALVEY, the patient experienced explosive relapse characterized by a rapid increase in free light chain (FLC) and PET-CT evidence of radiologic relapse with multiple new hypermetabolic bone lesions, followed by death 3 weeks later.
LITERATURE SEARCH
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 23 July 2026.
| 1 | Chari A, Touzeau C, Schinke C, et al. Safety and activity of talquetamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MonumenTAL-1): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(4):e269-e281. |
| 2 | Chari A, Minnema MC, Berdeja JG. Protocol to: Talquetamab, a T-cell–redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(24):2232-2244. |
| 3 | Gaballa MR, Julian K, Afrough A, et al. Real-world outcomes with BCMA-and GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibodies in plasma cell leukemia. [published online ahead of print July 02, 2026]. Blood Advances. 2026. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020826. |
| 4 | Bernardi C, Beauverd Y, Tran TA, et al. Anti-BCMA and GPRC5D bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory primary plasma cell leukemia: a case report. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1495233. |
| 5 | Noveihed A, Hadidi S, Mohan M, et al. Bispecific antibody therapy in central nervous system (CNS) multiple myeloma (MM): multicenter retrospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(16, Abstract):e19505. |
| 6 | Wieczorek M, Scomazzon E, Barilà G, et al. Talquetamab is an effective therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a two cases report. Bone Marrow Transplantation. 2025;60(1, Suppl. 1, Abstract):P562. Abstract 25. |