J&J Medical Connect
TALVEY®

(talquetamab-tgvs)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TALVEY - Occurrence and Management of Oral Toxicities and Weight Loss

Last Updated: 02/05/2026

SUMMARY

  • Johnson & Johnson does not recommend the use of TALVEY in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved labeling.
  • This response provides relevant data from company-sponsored clinical trials, and the content is limited to the studies included below.
  • MonumenTAL-1 is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1/2 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after ≥3 prior lines of therapy (LOTs), including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb).1
    • Rasche et al (2025)2 presented the incidence of oral and weight loss AEs from the MonumenTAL-1 study at an extended median follow-up of 38.2 months for the 0.4 mg/kg subcutaneous (SC) weekly (QW) cohort, 31.2 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC every other week (Q2W) cohort, and 30.3 months for the prior T-cell redirection therapy (TCR)-exposed (QW and Q2W) cohorts.
    • Chari et al (2025)1 published the incidence of oral and weight loss AEs from a post hoc analysis of the MonumenTAL-1 study at a median follow-up of 25.6 months for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 19.4 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort, and 16.8 months for the prior TCR-exposed cohort.
    • Rasche et al (2024)3 presented the incidence of taste-related AEs and taste disorder AEs from the MonumenTAL-1 study at a median follow-up of 29.8 months for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 23.4 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort, and 20.5 months for the prior TCR-exposed cohort.
    • Chari et al (2024)4 published the clinical management of AEs in patients with RRMM treated with TALVEY in the MonumenTAL-1 study. Oral AEs were reported in the QW, Q2W, and TCR cohorts.
    • Chari et al (2023)5 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and weight loss AEs in patients from the Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts of the MonumenTAL-1 study at a median follow-up of 13.2 months.
  • MonumenTAL-2 is an ongoing, phase 1b, multi-arm, open-label study evaluating TALVEY in combination with other anticancer therapies in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).6-8
    • Cohort D is evaluating the efficacy and safety of TALVEY in combination with DARZALEX FASPRO® (daratumumab hyaluronidase) and lenalidomide in 34 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).8
      • Nooka et al (2024)8 presented the incidence of taste-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), dry mouth, and weight loss AEs of the TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 13.2 months and the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg every 4 weeks (Q4W)+ DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 5.8 months.
    • Cohort E is evaluating the safety and efficacy of TALVEY in combination with pomalidomide in patients with RRMM.6
      • Quach et al (2025)6 presented the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from the TALVEY + pomalidomide cohort of the MonumenTAL-2 study at a longer median follow-up of 20.7 months.
  • RedirecTT-1 is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1b/2 evaluating the safety and efficacy of TALVEY and TECVAYLI® (teclistamab-cqyv) in patients with RRMM, including those with extramedullary disease (EMD).9-12
    • Usmani et al (2025)10 presented the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from the RedirecTT-1 phase 2 study in patients with RRMM and EMD at a median follow-up of 16.8 months.
    • Kumar et al (2025)11 published the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from phase 2 of the RedirecTT-1 study in patients with RRMM and EMD at a median follow-up of 12.6 months.
    • Mateos et al (2025)12 presented the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from phase 1b of the RedirecTT-1 study across all dose levels (dose levels 1-5) at a median follow up of 38 months, in patients with RRMM, including those with EMD.
    • Cohen et al (2025)9 published the incidence of oral AEs from the phase 1 dose-escalation segment of the RedirecTT-1 study at a median follow-up of 20.3 months across all dose levels (dose levels 1-5).
  • TRIMM-2 is an ongoing, phase 1b, multicohort open-label study evaluating the efficacy and safety of DARZALEX FASPRO in combination with TECVAYLI or TALVEY with or without pomalidomide in patients with RRMM.13-15
    • Chari et al (2025)15 published the incidence of oral AEs and decreased weight AEs in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO and the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO cohorts at a median follow-up of 18.6 months (range, 1.2-39.1).
    • Bahlis et al (2024)14 presented the incidence of oral AEs and decreased weight AEs of the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 15.8 months and the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 17.5 months.
  • TRIMM-3 is a phase 1b, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating the dosing, safety, and tolerability of a programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor in combination with TALVEY or TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM.16,17 
    • Perrot et al (2025)16 presented the incidence of oral and weight loss AEs in the TALVEY + cetrelimab cohort at a median follow-up of 11.5 months.
  • Other relevant literature has been identified in addition to the data summarized above.18-23
    • Health care provider's considerations for management of oral toxicities.21-23 
    • Retrospective descriptive study reported oral toxicities.18 
    • Prospective observational study quantifying the incidence and severity of dysgeusia and xerostomia.19 
    • Retrospective descriptive study reported oral toxicities.20 
    • Patient reported outcomes of oral toxicities.24

PRODUCT LABELING

BACKGROUND

  • G protein-coupled receptor, class C, group 5, member D (GPRC5D) is a 7-segment transmembrane orphan receptor protein that belongs to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors.25 It is predominantly expressed in cells with a plasma-cell phenotype, with higher expression levels on the surface of malignant plasma cells in patients with MM, thereby making it a potential immunotherapeutic target.26-28 It is found to be expressed both as a protein and mRNA in the hard keratinized tissues of the tongue (ie, filiform papillae),29,30 and residential or interstitial plasma cells within the salivary glands and tonsils.29
  • Taste disturbances can be categorized into hypogeusia, ageusia, phantogeusia and dysgeusia. Dysgeusia is commonly used as a general term for any type of taste disorder.31
  • Oral toxicities/taste evaluation can be assessed using the following criteria:
    • National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Per CTCAE, the maximum possible grade of dysgeusia is 2.32
    • Subjective total taste acuity (STTA).33 

CLINICAL DATA - Monumental-1 Study

MonumenTAL-1 (NCT03399799, NCT04634552) is a phase 1/2 study of TALVEY in patients with RRMM.1

Study Design/Methods (Phase 2)

Patients were enrolled into 1 of the following 4 cohorts:

  • TCR naive: 0.4 mg/kg SC QW, not previously exposed to TCR such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy or bispecific antibodies (BsAbs; prior BCMA antibody-drug conjugate [ADC] allowed).34,35
  • TCR naive: 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W, not previously exposed to TCRs (prior BCMA ADC allowed).34,35
  • TCR exposed: 0.4 mg/kg SC QW or 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W, have been previously exposed to TCRs.34,35
  • Key eligibility criteria1:
    • ≥18 years of age, measurable MM per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
    • ≥3 prior LOTs including a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 mAb.
    • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-2.

Rasche et al (2025)2 presented the incidence of oral-related and weight loss AEs from the MonumenTAL-1 study at an extended median follow-up of 38.2 months for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 31.2 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort, and 30.3 months for the prior TCR-exposed (QW and Q2W) cohorts.

Safety Results


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Summary of Oral and Weight Loss AEs (≥30% in Any Cohort)2
AE, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=154)
Prior TCR
QW and Q2W
(n=78)

Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Dysgeusiaa
103 (72.0)
NA
111 (72.1)
NA
59 (75.6)
NA
Weight decreased
59 (41.3)
3 (2.1)
64 (41.6)
9 (5.8)
29 (37.2)
1 (1.3)
Dry mouth
38 (26.6)
0
60 (39.0)
0
34 (43.6)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; NA, not applicable; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; TCR, T-cell redirection therapy.
Clinical data cutoff date of September 2024.
aIncludes ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder. Per CTCAE, the maximum possible grade of dysgeusia is 2.

Chari et al (2025)1,36 published the incidence of oral-related and weight loss AEs from the post hoc analysis of phases 1 and 2 of the MonumenTAL-1 study at a median follow-up of 25.6 months (interquartile range [IQR], 8.5-25.9) for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 19.4 months (IQR, 9.2-20.7) for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort, and 16.8 months (IQR, 7.6-18.7) for the prior TCR-exposed cohort.

Safety Results


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Summary of Oral and Weight Loss AEs in the TCR-Naïve Cohort1,36
Event, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QWa,b
(N=143)

0.8 mg/kg SC Q2Wa,b
(N=154)

Grade 1/2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 1/2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Taste-related changesc
103 (72)
-
-
110 (71)
-
-
Dry mouth
38 (27)
0
0
60 (39)
0
0
Weight decreased
56 (39)
3 (2)
0
56 (36)
8 (5)
0
Decreased appetite
27 (19)
2 (1)
0
41 (27)
2 (1)
0
Dysphagia
34 (24)
0
0
35 (23)
3 (2)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; SUD, step-up dose.
Clinical data cutoff date of October 11, 2023.
aReceived 2-3 SUDs.
bAEs are listed by frequency on an any-grade basis. AEs listed are grade 1-2 events occurring in at least 20% of patients in either group or grade 3 or worse occurring in at least 10% of patients in either group.
cIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder. Per CTCAE, the maximum grade for these events was 2.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Summary of Oral and Weight Loss AEs in the Prior TCR-Exposed Cohort1,36
Event, n (%)
Prior TCRa,b
(N=78)

Grade 1/2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 5
Taste-related changesc
59 (76)
-
-
-
Dry mouth
34 (44)
0
0
0
Weight decreased
28 (36)
1 (1)
0
0
Decreased appetite
17 (22)
1 (1)
0
0
Dysphagia
18 (23)
0
0
0
Oropharyngeal pain
10 (13)
0
0
0
Stomatitis
13 (17)
0
0
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; SUD, step-up dose; TCR, T-cell redirection therapy.
Clinical data cutoff date of October 11, 2023.
aReceived 2-3 SUDs.
bAEs included are grade 1/2 events occurring in ≥10% of patients or grade ≥3 AEs occurring in ≥5%. AEs are listed by frequency on an any-grade basis.
cIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder. Per CTCAE, the maximum grade for these events was 2.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Duration and Outcomes of Taste-Related AEs36
Event
0.4 mg/kg SC QWa (N=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2Wa (N=154)
Prior TCRa
(N=78)

Taste-related AEsb
   Total, n (%)
103 (72)
110 (71)
59 (76)
   Leading to dose modification,
   n (%)

12 (8)
9 (6)
6 (8)
   Median duration, days (IQR)
119.5 (51.0-232.0)
168.5 (84.0-325.0)
132.0 (37.0-303.0)
   Outcome, n (%)
      Number of events
127
126
68
         Recovered or resolved
65 (51)
50 (40)
26 (38)
         Not recovered or not
         resolved

59 (46)
67 (53)
40 (59)
         Recovered or resolved
         with sequelae

0
0
0
         Recovering or resolving
2 (2)
1 (1)
0
         Unknown
1 (1)
0
0
         Missing
0
8 (6)
2 (3)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; IQR, interquartile range; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; SUD, step-up dose; TCR, T-cell redirection therapy.
Clinical data cutoff date of October 11, 2023.
aReceived 2-3 SUDs.
bIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Treatment Discontinuation and Dose Reductions due to Oral and Weight-Loss AEs1,36
Event, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QWa (N=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2Wa (N=154)
Prior TCRa
(N=78)

Treatment discontinuation
   Dysgeusia
0
2 (1)
0
   Taste change
0
2 (-)
0
   Weight decreased
1 (1)
2 (1)
1 (1)
Dose reduction
   Taste disorderb
10 (7)
5 (3)
4 (5)
   Weight decreased
7 (5)
4 (3)
2 (3)
   Decreased appetite
2 (1)
1 (1)
1 (1)
   Dry mouth/dysphagia
1 (1)
4 (3)
4 (5)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; SUD, step-up dose; TCR, T-cell redirection therapy.
Clinical data cutoff date of October 11, 2023.
aReceived 2-3 SUDs.
bIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, and taste disorder.

Rasche et al (2024)3 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and weight loss from the MonumenTAL-1 study in patients receiving TALVEY at a median follow-up of 29.8 months for the 0.4 mg/kg SC QW cohort, 23.4 months for the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort, and 20.5 months for the prior TCR-exposed cohort.

Safety Results


MonumenTAL-1 Study: GPRC5D-Associated Oral AEs3
AE (Any Grade), n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=154)
Prior TCR
(n=78)

Taste relateda
   Total
103 (72.0)
110 (71.4)
59 (75.6)
   Leading to dose reduction
10 (7.0)
6 (3.9)
4 (5.1)
   Leading to discontinuation
0
3 (1.9)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; GPRC5D, G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D; Q2W, once every other week; QW, weekly; SC, subcutaneous; TCR, T-cell redirection.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 29, 2024.
aIncluding ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Weight Loss in Patients With Oral Toxicitya in the QW and Q2W Cohorts3

A graph with numbers and lines

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: C, cycle; D, day; No.; number; Pts, patients; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; SD, step-up dose; SE, standard error.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 29, 2024.
aIncluding dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, hypogeusia, dry mouth, dysphagia, cheilitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue edema, tongue ulceration.

Chari et al (2024)4 published the clinical management of AEs in patients with RRMM treated with TALVEY in the MonumenTAL-1 study. Results specific to oral toxicities and weight loss are summarized below.

Safety Results

Dysgeusia
  • Dysgeusia as an AE of any grade was reported in 245 (72%) patients.
    • Some events resolved completely or partially, defined as a reduction in severity from grade 2 to grade 1, while others did not resolve.
    • Dysgeusia can begin shortly after TALVEY dosing, sometimes on the first day or within a few days of step-up dosing.
  • The median duration of dysgeusia was 235.5 days (range, 1-870).
  • Two patients discontinued due to dysgeusia, both in the 0.8 mg/kg Q2W cohort.
Dry Mouth
  • Dry mouth as an AE of any grade was reported in 122 (36%) patients; grade 3/4 events were not observed in any patients.
  • The median total duration that patients experienced dry mouth across all events was 216 days (range, 4-628).
  • No patients discontinued treatment due to dry mouth.
Dysphagia
  • Dysphagia as an AE of any grade was reported in 82 (24%) patients, and grade 3/4 events were observed in 3 (1%) patients.
    • Most dysphagia cases were low grade.
    • Three (2.1%) patients, all in the 0.8 mg/kg Q2W cohort, had grade 3 dysphagia.
  • The median duration of dysphagia was 165.5 days (range, 20-572).
  • No patients discontinued treatment due to dysphagia.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Oral AEs Associated With TALVEY4
AE (Any Grade)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=145)
Prior TCR
(n=51)

Dysgeusia
   Total events, n (%)
103 (72.0)
103 (71.0)
39 (76.5)
   Grade 1, %
59.2
58.3
66.7
   Concurrent events, %
      Decreased appetite
10.7
11.7
2.6
      Dry mouth
19.4
16.5
20.5
      Weight loss ≥10% from baseline
20.4
15.5
10.3
   Median time to onseta, days
20.0
15.0
12.5
   Median durationb, days
95.0
102.0
130.0
   Resolvedc, n (%)
58 (45.7)
36 (30.8)
17 (37.0)
Dry mouth
   Total events, n (%)
38 (26.6)
58 (40)
26 (51)
   Concurrent events, %
      Decreased appetite
7.9
12.1
15.4
      Dysgeusia
23.7
31.0
38.5
      Dysphagia
5.3
9.0
16.7
      Weight loss ≥10% from baseline
13.2
6.9
11.5
   Median time to onseta, days
26.0
22.0
18.5
   Median durationb, days
57.0
89.0
58.5
   Resolvedc, n (%)
20 (50.0)
20 (31.3)
13 (40.6)
Dysphagia
   Total events, n (%)
34 (23.8)
36 (24.8)
12 (23.5)
   Concurrent events, %
      Decreased appetite
14.7
19.4
8.3
      Dry mouth
17.6
16.7
25
      Weight loss ≥10% from baseline
17.6
19.4
8.3
   Median time to onseta, days
20.5
28.5
27.5
   Median durationb, days
109.0
73.0
174.0
   Resolvedc, n (%)
25 (69.4)
29 (72.5)
4 (33.3)
Stomatitis, %
13.3
5.5
13.7
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; TCR, T-cell redirection; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aMedian time to onset calculated relative to the most recent dose received.
bMedian duration is based on events with both start and end time/dates available.
cPatients could have more than 1 event. Percentages are calculated with the number of events as the denominator.

Supportive Measures/Management

  • The MonumenTAL-1 protocol specified that oral events should be managed with mouth rinses, such as salt water or liquid corticosteroids, pain medications, and short courses of oral corticosteroids.
  • Per investigator experience, dose modification was the most effective management strategy for dysphagia, dysgeusia and dry mouth as per the investigator’s experience. See Table: MonumenTAL-1 Study: Dose Modifications for Oral Events for additional details.
  • Concomitant medications were also used to manage dysphagia, dysgeusia and dry mouth in all 3 cohorts. The efficacy of these measures were not formally assessed. See Table: MonumenTAL-1 Study: Most Common Supportive Measures and Concomitant Treatments for Oral AEs for additional details.
Dysgeusia
  • Increased TALVEY exposure led to a higher incidence of dysgeusia.
  • Nutritional monitoring and appropriate supplementation were implemented.
  • High caloric shakes were advised to ensure adequate nutritional intake and prevent weight loss.
  • Increased TALVEY exposure led to a higher incidence of dysgeusia.
  • Patients experiencing weight loss may need adjustments to weight-based medications, including TALVEY, and other conditions like hypotension and diabetes mellitus should be monitored closely.
Dry mouth
  • Increased hydration, intraoral topical agents, and sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-free toothpastes were suggested by investigators to manage dry mouth.
Dysphagia
  • Tramadol and oxycodone were used for pain, while corticosteroids were used to control inflammation.
  • “Magic mouthwash” containing at least 3 of an antihistamine, anesthetic, antacid, antifungal, corticosteroid, or antibiotic was used to manage pain and inflammation.
  • Frequent liquids and artificial saliva were administered for dry mouth-induced dysphagia.
Stomatitis
  • Patients with stomatitis-related dry mouth should be encouraged to use SLS-free toothpaste and corticosteroid mouthwash.

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Dose Modifications for Oral Events4
AE, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=145)
Prior TCR
(n=51)

Dysgeusia
   Dose modification
12 (8.4)
8 (5.5)
6 (11.8)
      Delayed
0
0
0
      Skippeda
7 (4.9)
4 (2.8)
5 (9.8)
      Reducedb
10 (7.0)
5 (3.4)
4 (7.8)
Dry mouth
   Dose modification
2 (1.4)
4 (2.8)
3 (5.9)
      Delayed
0
0
0
      Skippeda
2 (1.4)
2 (1.4)
2 (3.9)
      Reducedb
1 (0.7)
3 (2.1)
2 (3.9)
Dysphagia
   Dose modification
2 (1.4)
2 (1.4)
3 (5.9)
      Delayed
0
0
0
      Skippeda
2 (1.4)
1 (0.7)
1 (2.0)
      Reducedb
0
1 (0.7)
2 (3.9)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; TCR, T-cell redirection; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aDefined as patients who had at least 1 dose skip before resuming on the same dosing level and schedule thereafter.
bDefined as changes to either a reduced dose or a less frequent dosing schedule.


MonumenTAL-1 Study: Most Common Supportive Measures and Concomitant Treatments for Oral AEs4
AE, n (%)
0.4 mg/kg SC QW (n=143)
0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W (n=145)
Prior TCR
(n=51)

Dysgeusia
   Local oral concomitant
   medications (≥3 patients in any cohort)a

15 (10.5)
13 (9.0)
5 (9.8)
      Dexamethasone
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Triamcinolone
4 (2.8)
0
0
      Nystatin
0
3 (2.1)
1 (2.0)
Dry mouth
   Local oral concomitant medications
   (≥4 patients in any cohort)a

18 (12.6)
18 (12.4)
11 (21.6)
      Xylitol
6 (4.2)
1 (0.7)
3 (5.9)
      Glycerol
4 (2.8)
0
3 (5.9)
      Glucose oxidase
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Lactoferrin
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Lactoperoxidase
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Lysozyme
1 (0.7)
4 (2.8)
2 (3.9)
      Sorbitol
3 (2.1)
0
4 (7.8)
      Artificial saliva
0
4 (2.8)
0
Dysphagia
   Concomitant medications (≥2 patients
   in any cohort)a

9 (6.3)
11 (7.6)
4 (7.8)
      Sodium bicarbonate
0
4 (2.8)
0
      Sodium chloride
1 (0.7)
2 (1.4)
1 (2.0)
      Fluconazole
1 (0.7)
2 (1.4)
0
      Nutrients
0
2 (1.4)
0
      Omeprazole
0
2 (1.4)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; TCR, T-cell redirection; SC, subcutaneous.
Clinical data cutoff date of January 17, 2023.
aPatients could receive ≥1 concomitant medication.

Chari et al (2023)5 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and weight loss AEs of patients in MonumenTAL-1 who switched to reduced or less frequent dosing with TALVEY at a median follow-up of 13.2 months.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were divided into Responsive Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts and Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts.
    • Prospective Dose Intensity Reduction Cohorts (n=19):
      • TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W was reduced to 0.4 mg/kg Q2W in 9 patients who had at least partial response (≥PR).
      • TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W was reduced to 0.8 mg/kg once Q4W in 10 patients who had ≥PR.

Safety Results

MonumenTAL-1 Study: Prospective Cohorts With Change in Oral Toxicity and Weight Loss After Switch vs Matched Cohort Without Dose Reductiona,5

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; DR, dose reduction; PR, partial response.
Clinical data cutoff date of October 2, 2023.
aPatients included had ≥PR before day 200 from the prospective dose intensity reduction cohorts (n=18) and from the MonumenTAL-1 cohort who did not dose reduce (n=206). Each category shows only patients who had a respective AE on day 100. Color signifies how that respective AE grade changed from day 100 to last day of follow-up (within 30 days of last treatment; capped at 500 days).

CLINICAL DATA - Monumental-2 study

MonumenTAL-2 (NCT05050097) is an ongoing, phase 1b, multi-arm, open-label study evaluating TALVEY in combination with other anticancer therapies in patients with MM.6-8

Study Design/Methods

  • Key eligibility criteria:
    • Cohort D: measurable MM, NDMM, ECOG PS of 0-1, and transplant ineligible or not intended for transplant.8
    • Cohort E: measurable MM, ≥2 prior LOTs, including a PI and an immunomodulatory drug, ECOG PS of 0-1, prior pomalidomide and prior TCR (CAR-T and BsAb) permitted, and no prior GPRC5D-targeted therapy.6 

Cohort D

Nooka et al (2024)8 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and weight loss AEs of the TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 10.0-14.6) and the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q4W + DARZALEX FASPRO + lenalidomide cohort at a median follow-up of 5.8 months (range, 1.7 [denotes patients who died]-12.0).

Safety Results


MonumenTAL-2 Study (Cohort D): Summary of Oral Toxicities and Weight Loss TEAEs8
TEAE, n (%)
TALVEY 0.6 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO +
Lenalidomide
(n=8)

TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q4W +
DARZALEX FASPRO +
Lenalidomide
(n=26)

Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Taste-relateda
8 (100.0)
0
24 (92.3)
1 (3.8)
Dry mouth
5 (62.5)
0
12 (46.2)
0
Weight decreased
2 (25.0)
0
11 (42.3)
1 (3.8)
Abbreviations: CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Q2W, every other week; Q4W, every 4 weeks; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
Clinical data cutoff date of September 23, 2024.
aIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, and hypogeusia. Per CTCAE version 5.0, the maximum grade of dysgeusia was 2.

Cohort E

Quach et al (2025)6 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and decreased weight AEs from the TALVEY + pomalidomide cohort of the MonumenTAL-2 study at a median follow-up of 20.7 months (range, 1.2-38.7).

Safety Results


MonumenTAL-2 (Cohort E): Summary of Oral Toxicity and Decreased Weight (≥25%)6
AE, %
Any Grade (%)
Grade 3/4 (%)
Dysgeusiaa
77.1
0
Dry mouth
57.1
0
Weight decreased
25.7
5.7
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, common terminology criteria for adverse events.
Clinical data cutoff date of March 2025.
aDysgeusia defined per CTCAE v5.0; maximum grade is 2.

CLINICAL DATA - redirectt-1 STUDY - tAlvey + tecvayli COHORT

RedirecTT-1 (NCT04586426) is an ongoing, open-label, phase 1b/2 study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of the combination of TALVEY and TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM, including those with EMD.9-12

Study Design/Methods

  • Key eligibility criteria: relapsed or refractory or intolerant to established therapies including the last LOT; prior exposure to a PI, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti-CD38 mAb.9

Usmani et al (2025)10 presented the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from the RedirecTT-1 phase 2 study in patients with RRMM and EMD at a median follow-up of 16.8 months.

Safety Results


RedirecTT-1 Study (EMD TALVEY + TECVAYLI Cohort): Oral and Decreased Weight AEs10
AEa, %
TALVEY + TECVAYLI
(N=90)

Any grade
Maximum Grade 3/4
Oral AEsb
86.7
4.4
Weight decrease
53.3
12.2
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Clinical data cutoff date of July 18, 2025. Median follow-up 16.8 months.
aAEs graded by CTCAE v5.0. AEs were reported as treatment-emergent AEs recorded up to 30 days after the patient received last study treatment dose or until start of subsequent therapy.
bIncludes ageusia, cheilitis, dry mouth, dysgeusia, dysphagia, glossitis, glossodynia, hypogeusia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, taste disorder, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue oedema, and tongue ulceration.

  • RedirecTT-1 Study (EMD TALVEY + TECVAYLI Cohort): Oral and Weight Decrease AEs Following Adjustment to Q4W Dosing10
Outcomea, n (%)
Initial Q2W Dosing
(N=90)

After Adjustment to Q4W Dosing
(n=56)b

Oral AEsb
77 (85.6)
12 (21.4)
   Grade 3/4 oral AEsb
3 (3.3)
2 (3.6)
Weight decrease
46 (51.1)
15 (26.8)
   Grade 3/4 weight decrease
8 (8.9)
5 (8.9)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; Q2W, every other week; Q4W, once every 4 weeks.
Clinical data cutoff date of July 18, 2025. Median follow-up 16.8 months.
aNew onset AEs only; AEs are only counted once either before or after switch.
bIncludes ageusia, cheilitis, dry mouth, dysgeusia, dysphagia, glossitis, glossodynia, hypogeusia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, taste disorder, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue oedema, and tongue ulceration.

Kumar et al (2025)11,37 published the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from phase 2 of the RedirecTT-1 study at a median follow-up of 12.6 months (range, 0.5-19.5) in patients with RRMM and EMD.

Safety Results

  • At the data cutoff date of March 18, 2025, oral and weight decreased AEs were reported in patients with RRMM and EMD.
  • AEs were reported up to 30 days after the patient received the last dose of study treatment or until the start of subsequent antimyeloma therapy, whichever occurred first.
  • Oral-related AEs included ageusia, cheilitis, dry mouth, dysgeusia (maximum severity is grade 2 according to CTCAE), dysphagia, glossitis, glossodynia, hypogeusia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, taste disorder, tongue discomfort, tongue edema, tongue erythema, and tongue ulceration.
    • Dysgeusia was reported in 70% of patients (n=63), dry mouth in 44% of patients (n=40), and dysphagia in 29% of patients (n=26). All events were low grade except for grade 3 dysphagia in 2 patients (2%); one resolved after 11 days, and one remained unresolved at data cutoff.
  • Across all dose levels, any-grade oral AEs were reported in 86.7% of patients (n=78); grade 3/4 oral AEs were reported in 4.4% of patients (n=4).
  • Across all dose levels, any-grade decreased weight AEs in 53% of patients (n=48); grade 3/4 weight decrease AEs were reported in 11% of patients (n=10).
  • Dose modification due to oral AEs was reported in 10.0% of patients (n=9).
  • Median time to onset was 2 days (range, 1-30) relative to the most recent dose where day 1 is the day the most recent dose was received, based on 167 oral AEs.
  • Median duration was 115.5 days (range, 1-446) among events with both start and end dates available, based on 72 oral AEs.
  • Supportive measures were received by 37.8% of patients (n=34), and patients could have received ≥1 supportive therapy.
  • Discontinuation of TALVEY + TECVAYLI due to grade 2 dry mouth, grade 2 dysphagia, and grade 3 decreased weight AEs was reported in 1 patient.
  • Discontinuation of TALVEY due to grade 2 dysgeusia and grade 2 dysphagia was reported in 1 patient.

Mateos et al (2025)12 presented the incidence of oral and decreased weight AEs from phase 1b of the RedirecTT-1 study across all dose levels (dose levels 1-5) at a median follow up of 38 months, in patients with RRMM, including those with EMD.

Safety Results


RedirecTT-1 Study: Oral and Decreased Weight AEs12 
AEa, %
All Dose Levels (N=94)
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Oralb
78.7
1.1
Weight decrease
36.2
8.5
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; RP2R, recommended phase 2 regimen.
Clinical data cutoff date of July 2025. Median follow-up of 38.0 months for all doses levels and 34.5 months for the RP2R cohort.
aAEs graded by CTCAE v5.0.
bIncluding ageusia, cheilitis, dry mouth, dysgeusia, dysphagia, glossitis, glossodynia, hypogeusia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, taste disorder, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue edema, and tongue ulceration.


RedirecTT-1 Study: Treatment Discontinuation Due to Oral AEs12 
AE, n
TALVEY + TECVAYLI

TALVEY Only
Odynophagia
1
-
Gingival bleeding
-
1
Tongue discomfort
-
1
Dysgeusia
-
1
Abbreviation: AE, adverse event; RP2R, recommended phase 2 regimen.
Clinical data cutoff date of July 2025. Median follow-up of 38.0 months for all doses levels and 34.5 months for the RP2R cohort.

Cohen et al (2025)9,38 published the incidence of oral AEs from the phase 1 dose-escalation segment of the RedirecTT-1 study at a median follow-up of 20.3 months (range, 0.5-37.1) across all dose levels (dose levels 1-5) and 18.2 months in the recommended phase 2 regimen (RP2R; dose level 5) cohorts.

Safety Results

  • At the data cutoff date of March 15, 2024, oral-related adverse events (AEs) were reported for all dose levels (N=94) and for the RP2R cohort (n=44).

Oral-Related AEs

  • AEs were graded per CTCAE v5.0 and reported up to 30 days after the last dose of study treatment.
  • Oral-related AEs included taste changes (ageusia, dysgeusia, hypogeusia, and taste disorder per CTCAE), dry mouth, and weight decrease. The maximum grade for taste changes was grade 2 per CTCAE.
  • Across all dose levels, any-grade taste-change AEs were reported in 64.9% of patients (n=61), dry mouth in 42.6% of patients (n=40), and weight decrease AEs in 34% of patients (n=32).
  • In the RP2R cohort, any-grade taste-change AEs were reported in 50% of patients (n=22) and dry mouth in 40.9% of patients (n=18); no weight decrease AEs were reported in this cohort.
  • Across the all dose levels and the RP2R cohort, grade 3/4 AEs were not applicable to taste changes per CTCAE, and no grade 3/4 dry mouth AEs were reported. Grade 3/4 weight decrease AEs were reported in 5% of patients (n=5) across the all dose levels and in 0% of patients in the RP2R cohort.

Taste-Change AEs Across All Dose Levels

  • Dose modifications were reported in 5.3% of patients (n=5), and dose discontinuations were reported in 1% of patients (n=1) due to taste-change AEs.
  • The median time to onset from the last dose of study treatment was 2 days (range, 1-85), and the median duration was 161.5 days (range, 14-482).
  • A total of 64.9% of patients (n=61) received supportive measures for the management of taste-change AEs.

CLINICAL DATA - TRIMM-2 STUDY

TRIMM-2 (NCT04108195) is an ongoing, phase 1b, 2-part, multicohort, open-label study evaluating DARZALEX FASPRO regimens in combination with bispecific TCR antibodies with or without pomalidomide in patients with RRMM.13-15

Study Design/Methods

  • Key eligibility criteria15:
    • Double refractory to a PI and an immunomodulatory drug or received ≥3 prior LOTs (including a PI and an immunomodulatory drug).
    • Treatment with an anti-CD38 mAb (>90 days prior allowed) including anti-CD38 refractory patients.
    • Prior BsAb and CAR-T were allowed.

Chari et al (2025)15,39 published the incidence of oral AEs and decreased weight AEs in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO and the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO cohorts at a median follow-up of 18.6 months (range, 1.2-39.1).

Safety Results

  • Any grade oral events were reported in 89% of patients (n=58), including one grade 3/4 stomatitis event. See Table: TRIMM-2 Study (TALVEY + DARZALEX FASPRO Cohort): Oral AEs.
  • Dysgeusia (maximum grade 2 per CTCAE v5.0) was reported in 77% of patients (n=50), dry mouth in 57% of patients (n=37), and dysphagia in 25% of patients (n=16), all low grade.
  • One patient in the 0.8 mg/kg SC Q2W cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity due to grade 3 stomatitis/oral mucositis.
  • Any-grade weight decrease was reported in 37% of patients (n=24), and grade 3/4 weight decrease was reported in 3% of patients (n=2).
  • Dose skip of TALVEY due to weight decrease was reported in 5% of patients (n=3), and dose skip due to oral AEs was reported in 8% of patients (n=5).
  • Dose reduction due to oral AEs were reported in 12% of patients (n=8).
  • Dose reduction due weight decrease was reported in 9% of patients (n=6).

TRIMM-2 Study (TALVEY + DARZALEX FASPRO Cohort): Oral AEs15
Parameter
TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO
(n=14)
TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO
(n=51)
Oral AEsa, n (%)
12 (86)
46 (90)
   Grade 3 or 4, n (%)
0 (0)
1 (2)
   Leading to dose modificationsb,n (%)
3 (21)
18 (16)
   Median time to onsetc, days (range)
1.0 (1-15)
1.0 (1-21)
   Median duration, days (range)
100.5 (15-644)
87.0 (2-601)
   Concomitant medicationsd, n (%)
7 (50)
22 (43)
   Outcome, n (%)
      Recovered or resolved
19 (58)
54 (48)
      Not recovered or resolved
12 (36)
54 (48)
      Recovering or resolving
2 (6)
4 (4)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse events; Q2W, every other week; QW, once a week.
aIncludes dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, hypogeusia, dry mouth, dysphagia, cheilitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue edema, and tongue ulceration.
bDose modification includes cycle delays, delays within cycle, dose reductions, dose skips, and schedule changes.
cRelative to most recent dose (day of most recent dose=day 1).
dMost common concomitant medications (≥3 patients in the combined cohort) included dexamethasone, magic mouthwash.
Data cutoff date: November 17, 2023.

Bahlis et al (2024)14 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and weight loss AEs in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide and the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohorts at a median follow-up of 15.8 months (range, 3.2-37.9) and 17.5 months (range, 0.2-37.7), respectively.

Safety Results


TRIMM-2 Study (TALVEY + DARZALEX FASPRO + Pomalidomide Cohort): Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs14
AEa, n (%)
Tal 0.4 mg/kg QW + Dara + Pom
(n=18)

Tal 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + Dara+ Pom
(n=59)

Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Oral AEsb
18 (100.0)
0
50 (84.7)
4 (6.8)
Weight decreased
≥ 10%

12 (66.7)
2 (11.1)
29 (49.2)
10 (16.9)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; Dara, DARZALEX FASPRO; Q2W, every other week; QW, weekly; Pom; pomalidomide; Tal, TALVEY.
Clinical data cutoff date of July 29, 2024.
aAEs were graded by CTCAE v5.0
bOral AEs include dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, hypogeusia, dry mouth, dysphagia, cheilitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral mucosal erythema, oral pain, stomatitis, swollen tongue, tongue discomfort, tongue erythema, tongue edema, and tongue ulceration. As per CTCAE, the maximum grade for dysgeusia, which is a part of oral AEs, is 2. Dysgeusia (preferred term) occurred in 88.9% of patients in the TALVEY 0.4 mg/kg QW+ DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide and in 76.3% of patients in the TALVEY 0.8 mg/kg Q2W + DARZALEX FASPRO + pomalidomide cohort.

CLINICAL DATA - TRIMM-3 Study - TALVEY + CETRELIMAB COHORT

TRIMM-3 (NCT05338775) is a phase 1b, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluating the dosing, safety, and tolerability of TALVEY in combination with cetrelimab in patients with RRMM.16,17

Study Design/Methods

  • Key eligibility criteria16:
    • MM per IMWG criteria
    • RRMM who may not be eligible for or expected to benefit from available therapies
    • ECOG PS 0 or 1

Perrot et al (2025)16 presented the incidence of oral toxicities and weight loss AEs in the TALVEY + cetrelimab cohort at a median follow-up of 11.5 months (range, 1.5-32.3).

Safety Results


TRIMM-3 Study (TALVEY + Cetrelimab): Oral-Related and Weight Loss AEs (≥25% Overall)16 
AEa, n (%)
All Patients
(N=44)

Any Grade
Grade 3/4
Taste eventsb
36 (81.8)
0 (0)
Dry mouth
21 (47.7)
0 (0)
Weight decreased
15 (34.1)
1 (2.3)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Clinical data cutoff date of April 2, 2025.
aAEs were graded per CTCAE v5.0. AEs reported were treatment emergent.
bInclude dysgeusia, ageusia, taste disorder, and hypogeusia. Per CTCAE, the maximum grade for dysgeusia is 2.

literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 03 February 2026.

 

References

1 Chari A, Touzeau C, Schinke C, et al. Safety and activity of talquetamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MonumenTAL-1): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(4):e269-e281.  
2 Rasche L, Schinke C, Touzeau C, et al. Efficacy and safety from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: analyses at an extended median follow-up. Poster presented at: The 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; May 30-June 3, 2025; Chicago, IL/Virtual.  
3 Rasche L, Schinke C, Touzeau C, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Poster presented at: The European Hematology Association (EHA) 2024 Hybrid Congress; June 13-16, 2024; Madrid, Spain.  
4 Chari A, Krishnan A, Rasche L, et al. Clinical management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with talquetamab. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024;24(10):665-693.e14.  
5 Chari A, Oriol A, Krishnan A, et al. Efficacy and safety of less frequent/lower intensity dosing of talquetamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Oral Presentation presented at: The 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA.  
6 Quach H, Perrot A, Matous JV, et al. Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in combination with pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study. Poster presented at: The 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 6-9, 2025; Orlando, FL.  
7 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A multi-arm phase 1b study of talquetamab with other anticancer therapies in participants with multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2026 February 3]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05050097 NLM Identifier NCT05050097.  
8 Nooka AK, Cochrane T, D’Souza A, et al. Talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b MonumenTAL-2 study. Poster presented at: The 66th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 7-10, 2024; San Diego, CA.  
9 Cohen YC, Magen H, Gatt M, et al. Talquetamab plus teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(2):138-149.  
10 Usmani SZ, Kumar S, Mateos MV, et al. Efficacy and safety of talquetamab + teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and extramedullary disease: updated phase 2 results from the RedirecTT-1 study with extended follow-up. Oral Presentation presented at: the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 6-9, 2025; Orlando, FL.  
11 Kumar S, Mateos MV, Ye JC, et al. Dual targeting of extramedullary myeloma with Talquetamab and Teclistamab. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(1):51-61.  
12 Mateos MV, Magen H, Gatt M, et al. Safety and efficacy of talquetamab + teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from phase 1b of RedirecTT-1: results with an extended median follow-up of 3 years. Oral presentation presented at: the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 6-9, 2025; Orlando, FL.  
13 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1b study of subcutaneous daratumumab regimens in combination with bispecific T cell redirection antibodies for the treatment of subjects with multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2026 February 3]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04108195 NLM Identifier: NCT04108195.  
14 Bahlis N, van de Donk NWCJ, Reece D, et al. Talquetamab + daratumumab + pomalidomide in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the phase 1b TRIMM2 study. Oral Presentation presented at: 21st International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting; September 25-28, 2024; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  
15 Chari A, Donk NWCJ van de, Dholaria B, et al. Talquetamab plus daratumumab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the TRIMM-2 study. Blood. 2025;146(24):2902-2913.  
16 Perrot A, Touzeau C, Rodríguez-Otero P, et al. Talquetamab + cetrelimab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: initial safety and efficacy results from the phase 1b TRIMM-3 study. Oral Presentation presented at: the European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Meeting; June 12-15, 2025; Milan, Italy.  
17 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 1b study of bispecific T cell redirection antibodies in combination with checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of participants with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2026 February 3]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05338775 NLM Identifier: NCT05338775.  
18 Lery M, Perrot A, Ortiz-Brugués A, et al. Dermatological toxicities induced by T-cell-redirecting G protein-coupled receptor family C class 5 member D bispecific antibody talquetamab [abstract]. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024;90(2):376-377.  
19 Laheij AMGA, Donk NWCJ van de. Characterization of dysgeusia and xerostomia in patients with multiple myeloma treated with the T-cell redirecting GPRC5D bispecific antibody talquetamab. Support Care Cancer. 2024;32(1):20.  
20 Naqvi S, Shrestha A, Alzubi M, et al. Weight loss and dysgeusia in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with talquetamab. eJHaem. 2024.  
21 Shenoy S, Leahey S, Catamero D, et al. Management considerations for oral toxicities associated with talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: experience in monumenTAL-1. Poster presented at: The 49th Annual Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) Congress; April 24-28, 2024; Washington, DC.  
22 Catamero D, Purcell K, Ray C, et al. Practical management of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma receiving talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody: Experience in MonumenTAL-1. Poster presented at: The 20th International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting Nurse Symposium; September 27-30, 2023; Athens, Greece.  
23 Schinke C, Dhakal B, Mazzoni S, et al. Real-world experience with clinical management of talquetamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a qualitative study of US healthcare providers. Curr Méd Res Opin. 2024;40(10):1705-1711.  
24 Popat R, Greenwood A, Wilson W, et al. Oral symptom assessment using patient reported outcomes (PRO) for relapsed multiple myeloma patients treated with Talquetamab. Abstract presented at: 21st International Myeloma Society (IMS) Annual Meeting; September 25-28, 2024; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  
25 Bräuner-Osborne H, Jensen A, Sheppard P, et al. Cloning and characterization of a human orphan family C G-protein coupled receptor GPRC5D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1518(3):237-248.  
26 Kodama T, Kochi Y, Nakai W, et al. Anti-GPRC5D/CD3 bispecific T-cell-redirecting antibody for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18(9):1555-1564.  
27 Atamaniuk J, Gleiss A, Porpaczy E, et al. Overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor 5D in the bone marrow is associated with poor prognosis in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42(9):953-960.  
28 Verkleij C, Broekmans M, Duin M. Preclinical activity and determinants of response of the GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody talquetamab in multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2021;5(8):2196-2215.  
29 Goldsmith R, Cornax I, Ma J, et al. Normal human tissue expression of G protein–coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), a promising novel target for multiple myeloma, is restricted to plasma cells and hard keratinized tissues. Poster presented at: 18th International Myeloma Workshop of the International Myeloma Society; September 8-11, 2021; Vienna, Austria.  
30 Inoue S, Nambu T, Shimomura T. The RAIG family member, GPRC5D, is associated with hard-keratinized structures. J Invest Dermatol. 2004;122(3):565-573.  
31 Epstein J, Silva S de AE, Epstein G, et al. Taste disorders following cancer treatment: report of a case series. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(12):4587-4595.  
32 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0. 2017 - [cited 2026 February 3]. Available from: https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_8.5x11.pdf
33 Epstein JB, Barasch A. Taste disorders in cancer patients: Pathogenesis, and approach to assessment and management. Oral Oncol. 2010;46(2):77-81.  
34 Jakubowiak AJ, Anguille S, Karlin L, et al. Updated results of talquetamab, a GPRC5D×CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with prior exposure to T-cell redirecting therapies: results of the phase 1/2 MonumenTAL-1 study. Poster presented at: The 65th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting; December 9-12, 2023; San Diego, CA/Virtual.  
35 Schinke CD, Touzeau C, Minnema MC, et al. Pivotal phase 2 MonumenTAL-1 results of talquetamab, a GPRC5DxCD3 bispecific antibody, for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting; June 2-6, 2023; Chicago, IL/Virtual.  
36 Chari A, Touzeau C, Schinke C, et al. Supplement to: Safety and activity of talquetamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MonumenTAL-1): a multicentre, open-label, phase 1-2 study. Lancet Haematol. 2025;12(4):e269-e281.  
37 Kumar S, Mateos MV, Ye JC, et al. Supplement: Dual targeting of extramedullary myeloma with Talquetamab and Teclistamab. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(1):51-61.  
38 Cohen YC, Magen H, Gatt M, et al. Supplement to: Talquetamab plus teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(2):138-149.  
39 Chari A, Donk NWCJ van de, Dholaria B, et al. Supplement to: Talquetamab plus daratumumab for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the TRIMM-2 study. Blood. 2025;146(24):2902-2913.