J&J Medical Connect
SPRAVATO®

(esketamine)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics Associated With Relapse

Last Updated: 09/21/2026

Summary

  • The SUSTAIN-1 study was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study conducted in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). It comprised an initial
    4-week open-label induction and a 12-week optimization phase followed by a randomized withdrawal maintenance phase of variable duration and a 2-week posttreatment follow-up phase to evaluate the efficacy of continuing treatment with SPRAVATO + oral antidepressant (OAD) vs switching to placebo nasal spray + OAD in delaying relapse of depressive symptoms.1
    • Induction/optimization phase: patients received intranasal SPRAVATO (56 mg or
      84 mg, flexibly dosed) twice weekly + a new OAD taken daily.
    • Maintenance phase: patients who attained stable response or stable response remission were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either continue SPRAVATO + OAD or discontinue SPRAVATO and receive placebo + OAD during the maintenance phase.
  • Shelton et al (2026)2 conducted a post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN-1 to evaluate potential predictors of relapse (focused on baseline demographics and disease-related characteristics) in patients randomized to the placebo + OAD group after 16 weeks of treatment with SPRAVATO + OAD.
    • At maintenance baseline, relapse occurred more frequently in the placebo + OAD group (45.3%) compared with the SPRAVATO + OAD group (26.7%).
    • Potential predictors of relapse for patients who discontinued SPRAVATO treatment included ≥3 prior antidepressant treatments, a lifetime history of suicidal behavior, or being categorized as “markedly ill” per Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) category.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN-1 Study

Shelton et al (2026)2 conducted a post hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN-1 study to evaluate potential predictors of relapse in patients randomized to the placebo + OAD group (after 16 weeks of treatment with SPRAVATO + OAD). This analysis focused on the baseline demographics and disease-related characteristics that may be associated with an increased risk of relapse in these patients.

Study Design/Methods

  • In SUSTAIN-1, patients received intranasal SPRAVATO (56 mg or 84 mg) + OAD during the 16-week induction and optimization phases.
  • Patients who attained stable remission were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either continue SPRAVATO + OAD or discontinue SPRAVATO and receive placebo + OAD during the maintenance phase.
  • Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) assessments were conducted weekly during the maintenance phase.
  • Stable remission was defined as MADRS total score ≤12 for at least 3 of the last 4 weeks of the optimization phase.
  • Relapse was defined as MADRS total score ≥22 for 2 consecutive assessments and/or hospitalization for suicidality or worsening depression or any other clinically relevant event (assessed by the investigator).
  • Initial screening of candidate predictors used univariate Cox proportional hazards models; variables with nominal significance (P<0.3) were advanced with no multiplicity adjustment.
  • Candidate predictors were then entered into a stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, with candidates entered sequentially and removed if they became nonsignificant; the final model retained predictors with nominal P<0.05.

Results

Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics
  • A total of 176 patients attained stable remission after 16 weeks of SPRAVATO + OAD and were subsequently randomized to continue SPRAVATO + OAD (n=90) or switch to placebo + OAD (n=86).
    • At maintenance baseline, relapses occurred more frequently in the placebo + OAD group (45.3%) compared with the SPRAVATO + OAD group (26.7%).
  • In patients who discontinued SPRAVATO (randomized to the placebo + OAD group in the maintenance phase, n=86), statistically significant differences were found between relapsed and nonrelapsed patients for age (P=0.040), number of previous antidepressants (P=0.046), class of OAD (P=0.047), and baseline CGI-S (P<0.001).
Predictors of Relapse
  • Initial screening candidates identified as potential predictors of relapse (nominal P<0.3) were current age, presence of hypertension, employment status of “other” vs employed, age at MDD diagnosis, duration of current MDD episode, 2 vs ≥3 prior antidepressants, class of OAD (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SNRI] vs (serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SSRI]), specific OADs (escitalopram vs duloxetine, sertraline vs duloxetine, and venlafaxine ER vs duloxetine), screening Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (lifetime suicidal ideation vs. no event), and baseline CGI-S category (markedly vs mildly and moderately ill).
  • Potential independent predictors of relapse were identified using a stepwise multivariate Cox model. See Table: Variables Associated With Increased Risk of Relapse Identified Using a Stepwise Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Model.

Variables Associated With Increased Risk of Relapse Identified Using a Stepwise Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Model2
Parameter
HR
(95% CI)

Nominal P-Value
Number of previous antidepressants
   2 vs ≥3
0.45 (0.22-0.93)
0.030
Screening C-SSRS, lifetime
   Suicidal behavior vs no event
4.38 (1.14-16.83)
0.032
Baseline CGI-S category
   Markedly vs mildly and moderately illa
16.62 (2.09-131.89)a
0.008
Abbreviations: CGI-S, Clinical Global Impression-Severity; CI, confidence interval; C-SSRS, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale; HR, hazard ratio.
aOnly 1 patient experienced relapse in the CGI-S mildly and moderately ill category. P-values reported are nominal and not adjusted for multiple testing.

  • Initial screening variables not meeting statistical significance (P>0.03) were baseline age, race, ethnicity, BMI, status of unemployed vs employed, C-SSRS (lifetime suicidal behavior vs no event), screening C-SSRS in past 6 or 12 months (suicidal ideation and behavior vs no event), screening 30-item Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, baseline MADRS/Patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score, baseline CGI-S, including CGI-S category of severely and most extremely vs mildly and moderately ill.

Limitations of the Study

  • Generalizability may be limited due to exclusion of patients with significant comorbidities or substance dependence.
  • As a non-prespecified analysis with a small sample size, findings may have limited statistical power and interpretation of the results.
  • The modeling approach (univariate screening followed by multivariate analysis without multiplicity adjustment) may introduce overfitting and selection bias.

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 15 September 2026.

 

References

1 Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant treatment for relapse prevention in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(9):893-903.  
2 Shelton R, Turkoz I, Fu DJ, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for relapse prevention in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a post hoc analysis of predictors of relapse in placebo-treated patients in SUSTAIN-1. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology (ASCP) Annual Meeting; May 26-29; Miami, USA.  

Would you like to clear and leave your conversation? Message history will be lost.