J&J Medical Connect
INLEXZO™

(gemcitabine intravesical system)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

INLEXZO - SunRISe-2 Study

Last Updated: 03/03/2026

SUMMARY

  • SunRISe-2 (NCT04658862) is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of INLEXZO plus systemic cetrelimab, an investigational immunoglobulin G4 antibody that targets the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) receptor, vs concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who refuse or are ineligible for radical cystectomy (RC).1-4 The primary endpoint was bladder-intact event-free survival (BI-EFS).
  • Following an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) recommendation and pre-specified interim analysis, SunRISe-2 was discontinued because the pre-defined futility criteria were met.1,5
  • Necchi et al (2026)1 presented the efficacy and safety of the SunRISe-2 study at the data cutoff of July 7, 2025.
    • INLEXZO plus cetrelimab did not improve BI‑EFS compared with chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
    • The overall response rate (ORR) at week 18 was lower with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab (56.7%; 95% CI, 49.8-63.5) compared with CRT (65.3%; 95% CI, 58.4-71.9).
    • Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) leading to discontinuation were reported in 15.0% of patients receiving INLEXZO plus cetrelimab and in 9.5% of those receiving CRT.
    • No treatment-related deaths were reported with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab.

Product Labeling

BACKGROUND

  • INLEXZO (gemcitabine intravesical system) is an intravesical drug releasing system (iDRS), referred to as gem-iDRS and TAR-200 in literature. INLEXZO is designed to provide local release of gemcitabine in the bladder. INLEXZO contains gemcitabine and urea minitablets within a dual-lumen silicone tube for gradual release of gemcitabine by an osmotic delivery mechanism throughout the prescribed indwelling period.2,6-10
  • INLEXZO is inserted intravesically via urinary placement catheter, after which it self-coils into a bi-oval shape (see Figure: INLEXZO iDRS). Removal of INLEXZO can be achieved using grasping forceps and cystoscopy.10,11
  • Preliminary safety and efficacy results from a phase 1b study in patients with MIBC who had INLEXZO placed prior to scheduled RC have been published.7

INLEXZO iDRS2,6,12,13

A graphic design of a train track

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Abbreviations: iDRS, intravesical drug releasing system.

CLINICAL DATA

SunRISe-2 Study

Necchi et al (2026)1 presented the final efficacy and safety results in patients receiving INLEXZO in combination with cetrelimab vs CRT in MIBC in the SunRISe-2 study.

Study Design/Methods

  • Phase 3, prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of INLEXZO plus systemic cetrelimab, an investigational immunoglobulin G4 antibody that targets PD-1 receptor, vs concurrent CRT in patients with MIBC who refuse or are ineligible for RC.2-4
  • Study enrollment does not require determination of PD-1 expression.2
  • The study design is shown in Figure: SunRISe-2 Study Design.

SunRISe-2 Study Design1-4

Abbreviations: BIW, twice weekly; c, clinical stage; CIS, carcinoma in situ; CrCl, creatinine clearance; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; Gy, gray; IV, intravenous; M, distant metastasis; MIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; N, lymph node; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; QW, every week; Q3W, every 3 weeks; Q12W, every 12 weeks; R, randomization; RC, radical cystectomy; RECIST, Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; SOC, standard of care; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; T, primary tumor; T1, tumor grade 1; Ta, tumor grade a.

Clinical data cutoff was July 7, 2025.
aTa/T1/CIS of the upper urinary tract (including the renal pelvis and ureter) is allowed to be included if treated with complete nephroureterectomy >24 months prior to the study.
bInvestigator’s choice.
cRadiation therapy was either conventional (64 Gy, bladder only) for up to 6.5 weeks or hypofractionated (55 Gy, bladder only) for up to 4 weeks.
dDefined as the time from randomization to first bladder-intact event-free survival event, including histologically proven MIBC, clinical evidence of nodal or metastatic disease (per RECIST 1.1), RC, or death.
e
Defined as the time from randomization to first radiologic or histologic evidence of metastatic disease (per RECIST 1.1) or death.
fComplete response + partial response. A futility analysis based on ORR was conducted after 300 patients completed the week 18 disease assessment.
gDefined as the time from randomization to death.

Futility Analysis

  • At the data cutoff of June 28, 2024, a futility analysis based on ORR was conducted after 300 patients completed the week 18 disease assessment.
  • On September 9, 2024, IDMC recommended termination of the study for futility.
  • Per futility criteria, ORR with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab needed to be either higher than CRT or lower than CRT by no more than 15%. If the ORR with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab was lower than CRT by more than 15%, the IDMC would review the risks and benefits of INLEXZO plus cetrelimab to inform the nonbinding recommendation for futility.
  • Enrollment was discontinued on September 11, 2024, as the prespecified futility criteria was met. At this timepoint, 518 patients were randomized (arm 1, n=262; arm 2, n=256).
    • Patients in arm 1 achieving a week 18 complete response (CR) were allowed to continue study treatment (transitioning to long-term extension), while patients in arm 2 were allowed to complete study treatment and then discontinue after the 100day safety followup.
  • The final analysis includes exploratory efficacy analyses (BI-EFS, ORR, metastasis-free survival [MFS], overall survival [OS]) and safety at the clinical data cutoff date of July 7, 2025.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

Patient Characteristics in the INLEXZO + CET and CRT Groups1
Characteristic
INLEXZO + CET
(n=262)

CRT
(n=256)

Median age, years (range)
71.0 (46-91)
72.0 (36-90)
Male, n (%)
205 (78.2)
196 (76.6)
Race, n (%)
   White
153 (58.4)
154 (60.2)
   Asian
86 (32.8)
80 (31.3)
   Other
10 (3.8)
10 (3.9)
   Not reported/unknown
13 (5.0)
12 (4.7)
Region, n (%)
   North and South America
92 (35.1)
89 (34.8)
   Europe
84 (32.1)
89 (34.8)
   Asia
86 (32.8)
78 (30.5)
Nicotine use history, n (%)
   Current
49 (18.7)
43 (16.8)
   Former
123 (46.9)
117 (45.7)
   Never
90 (34.4)
96 (37.5)
ECOG performance status, n (%)
   0
184 (70.2)
180 (70.3)
   1-2
78 (29.8)
76 (29.7)
Reason for not receiving RC, n (%)
   Refused
223 (85.1)
218 (85.2)
   Ineligible
39 (14.9)
38 (14.8)
Visibly complete TURBTb
225 (85.9)
223 (87.1)
Tumor stage at screening reTURBTa,b, n (%)
   T0
107 (44.4)
91 (38.6)
   Ta/T1/Tis
64 (26.6)
75 (31.8)
   ≥T2
70 (29.0)
70 (29.7)
Variant histologyc, n (%)
8 (3.1)
17 (7.1)
Type of radiation therapy receivedd, n (%)
   Conventional (64 Gy)
N/A
156 (64.7)
   Hypofractionated (55 Gy)
N/A
85 (35.3)
Abbreviations: CET, cetrelimab; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; Gy, gray; RC, radical cystectomy; TURBT, transurethral resection of bladder tumor; T, primary tumor; Tis, tumor in situ.Clinical cutoff date July 7, 2025.aTURBT was conducted at prescreening and screening. The screening TURBT was used for stratification.bn=241 for INLEXZO + CET and N=236 for CRT.cn=254 for INLEXZO + CET and N=240 for CRT.dn=241 for CRT-treated patients.
Efficacy
  • At the data cutoff of July 7, 2025, the median follow-up was 11.3 (range, 0.03-43.2) months.
  • The addition of cetrelimab to INLEXZO did not improve BI-EFS compared with CRT as shown in Table: BI-EFS Rates at 6 and 12 Months.

BI‑EFS Rates at 6 and 12 Months1
Timepoints
INLEXZO + CET
(n=262)

CRT
(n=256)

Median (95% CI)
NR (22.93-NE)
NR (26.58-NE)
6-month BI-EFS, % (95% CI)
73.5 (66.6-79.3)
86.9 (80.9-91.2)
12-month BI-EFS, % (95% CI)
65.5 (57.9-72.1)
79.9 (72.3-85.6)
Abbreviations: BI-EFS, bladder-intact event-free survival; CI, confidence interval; CET, cetrelimab; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; MIBC, muscle-invasive bladder cancer; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; RC, radical cystectomy.Clinical cutoff date July 7, 2025.
  • The ORR at week 18 was lower with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab compared with CRT as summarized in Table: ORR at Week 18.

ORR at Week 18a1
INLEXZO + CET
(n=215)

CRT
(n=202)

ORR, % (95% CI)
56.7 (49.8-63.5)
65.3 (58.4-71.9)
CR, n (%)
109 (50.7)
120 (59.4)
PR, n (%)
13 (6.0)
12 (5.9)
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CET, cetrelimab; CR, complete response; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response.Clinical cutoff date July 7, 2025.aORR was for the evaluable analysis set that consisted of all patients who had at least 1 week 18 efficacy assessment, had disease progression prior to or in week 18, or discontinued the study without the week 18 assessment. Nonresponse was reported in 93 (43.3%) patients in the INLEXZO + CET arm and 70 (34.7%) patients in the CRT arm.

BI‑EFS Rates at 6 and 12 Months Among Patients with CR at Week 18a1
Timepoints
INLEXZO + CET
(n=109)

CRT
(n=120)

6-month BI-EFS, % (95% CI)
92.5 (84.8-96.4)
95.0 (88.5-97.9)
12-month BI-EFS, % (95% CI)
86.0 (76.5-91.9)
82.0 (70.4-89.4)
Abbreviations: BI-EFS, bladder-intact event-free survival; CI, confidence interval; CET, cetrelimab; CR, complete response; CRT, chemoradiotherapy.Clinical cutoff date July 7, 2025.

MFS and OS in the INLEXZO + CET and CRT Groups1
MFSa
OSb
INLEXZO + CET
(n=262)

CRT
(n=256)

INLEXZO + CET
(n=262)

CRT
(n=256)

Median (95% CI)
NR (26.78-NE)
NR (NE-NE)
NR (NE-NE)
NR (NE-NE)
6-month timepoint, % (95% CI)
84.3 (78.2-88.8)
87.5 (81.6-91.6)
96.2 (92.8-98.0)
98.2 (95.1-99.3)
12-month timepoint, % (95% CI)
75.6 (68.2-81.5)
82.3 (75.1-87.6)
88.8 (83.2-92.6)
95.4 (90.8-97.7)
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval, CET, cetrelimab; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; HR, hazard ratio; MFS, metastasis-free survival; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival.Clinical cutoff date July 7, 2025.aMFS is defined as the time from randomization to first radiologic (as assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria) evidence of metastatic disease or death due to any cause. Patients known to be alive and free of metastatic disease are censored at the date of last assessment.bOS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. Patients who do not have an OS event were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive.
Safety
  • At the data cutoff of July 7, 2025, the median duration of exposure was 18.2 (range, 1-151) weeks for INLEXZO, 22.7 (range, 0-82) weeks for cetrelimab, and 6.4 (range, 0-15) weeks for CRT.
  • The most frequent any-grade and grade ≥3 TRAEs in both treatment arms are summarized in Table: Summary of TRAEs.

Summary of TRAEs1
Patients with Events, n (%)
INLEXZO + CET
(n=254)

CRT
(n=241)

Any Grade
Grade ≥3
Any Grade
Grade ≥3
≥1 TRAE
203 (79.9)
68 (26.8)
212 (88.0)
77 (32.0)
Most frequent TRAEs (reported in ≥10% of patients)
   Dysuria
66 (26.0)
1 (0.4)
47 (19.5)
1 (0.4)
   Urinary tract infection
63 (24.8)
16 (6.3)
18 (7.5)
4 (1.7)
   Pollakiuria
53 (20.9)
0
28 (11.6)
1 (0.4)
   Hematuria
32 (12.6)
1 (0.4)
18 (7.5)
2 (0.8)
   Hypothyroidism
27 (10.6)
1 (0.4)
0
0
   Anemia
12 (4.7)
1 (0.4)
54 (22.4)
9 (3.7)
   Fatigue
11 (4.3)
2 (0.8)
27 (11.2)
1 (0.4)
   Diarrhea
11 (4.3)
1 (0.4)
69 (28.6)
5 (2.1)
   Constipation
6 (2.4)
0
28 (11.6)
1 (0.4)
   Asthenia
6 (2.4)
1 (0.4)
22 (9.1)
2 (0.8)
   Nausea
5 (2.0)
0
49 (20.3)
0
   Lymphopenia
5 (2.0)
0
21 (8.7)
19 (7.9)
   Thrombocytopenia
4 (1.6)
0
67 (27.8)
7 (2.9)
   Neutropenia
4 (1.6)
1 (0.4)
41 (17.0)
21 (8.7)
   Decreased appetite
4 (1.6)
1 (0.4)
28 (11.6)
0
   Leukopenia
0
0
41 (17.0)
15 (6.2)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CET, cetrelimab; CRT, chemoradiotherapy; TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.
  • TRAEs leading to discontinuation were reported in 15.0% of patients treated with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab and in 9.5% of those receiving CRT.
    • Dysuria and adrenal insufficiency were the most common discontinuation‑related TRAEs with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab (1.2% each), while thrombocytopenia (1.7%) was most common with CRT.
  • No treatmentrelated deaths were reported with INLEXZO plus cetrelimab, whereas one treatmentrelated death was observed in the CRT arm.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 24 February 2026.

 

References

1 Necchi A, Williams S, Tran P, et al. Gemcitabine intravesical system (Gem-iDRS) in combination with cetrelimab versus chemoradiotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: SunRISe-2 final results. Oral Presentation presented at: ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium; February 26-28, 2026; San Francisco, CA, USA.  
2 Williams SB, Cutie C, Keegan K, et al. Sunrise-2: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized study evaluating the efficacy of TAR-200 in combination with cetrelimab versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in participants with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder [abstract]. J Urol. 2021;206(Suppl. 3):e250. Abstract MP13-17.  
3 Williams SB, Jessner W, Tammaro M, et al. SunRISe-2: a phase 3, multicenter, randomized study evaluating the efficacy of TAR-200 in combination with cetrelimab versus chemoradiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Oral Presentation presented at: American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting; May 3-6, 2024; San Antonio, TX.  
4 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A phase 3, multi-center, randomized study evaluating efficacy of TAR-200 in combination with cetrelimab versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in participants with muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (MIBC) of the bladder who are not receiving radical cystectomy. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2026 February 24]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04658862 NLM Identifier: NCT04658862.  
5 Johnson & Johnson Statement on the SunRISe-2 Study. https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/johnson-johnson-statement-on-the-sunrise-2-study Accessed 2026 February 24.  
6 Douglass L, Schoenberg M. The future of intravesical drug delivery for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer. 2016;2(3):285-292.  
7 Daneshmand S, Pohar KS, Steinberg GD, et al. Effect of GemRIS (gemcitabine-releasing intravesical system, TAR-200) on antitumor activity in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) [abstract]. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(Suppl. 15). Abstract e16000.  
8 Tan WS, Kelly JD. Intravesical device-assisted therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15(11):667-685.  
9 Daneshmand S, Heijden MSV der, Jacob JM, et al. TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from the phase IIb SunRISe-1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(33):3578-3588.  
10 Daneshmand S, Kamat AM, Shore ND, et al. Development of TAR-200: a novel targeted releasing system designed to provide sustained delivery of gemcitabine for patients with bladder cancer. Urol Oncol. 2025;43(5):286-296.  
11 Daneshmand S, van der Hejiden MS, Jacob JM, et al. Clinical protocol for: TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from the phase IIb SunRISe-1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(33):3578-3588.  
12 Grimberg DC, Shah A, Inman BA. Overview of Taris GemRIS, a novel drug delivery system for bladder cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2020;6(4):620-622.  
13 Daneshmand S, Brummelhuis ISG, Pohar KS, et al. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical drug delivery system (TAR-200) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a phase I trial. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(7):344.e1-344.e9.