J&J Medical Connect
ICOTYDE™

(icotrokinra)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

ICOTYDE™ (icotrokinra)

Medical Information

ICOTYDE - Treatment of Nail Psoriasis

Last Updated: 03/18/2026

SUMMARY

  • The company cannot recommend any practices, procedures, or usage of ICOTYDE that deviate from the approved labeling.
  • The safety and efficacy of ICOTYDE in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) were evaluated in the ICONIC-TOTAL (NCT06095102), ICONIC-LEAD (NCT06095115), ICONIC-ADVANCE 1 (NCT06143878), and ICONIC-ADVANCE 2 (NCT06220604) phase 3 clinical trials. Summarized below are data specific to patients with nail PsO in the ICONIC-TOTAL and ICONIC-LEAD studies.1-6
    • In ICONIC-TOTAL, at week 16, patients receiving ICOTYDE had a 33% improvement in modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (mNAPSI) from baseline vs 9% in the placebo (PBO) group.3
      • At week 52, patients in the ICOTYDE group showed a 62% mean mNAPSI improvement, and patients who switched from PBO achieved nail PsO improvements (59%) comparable to those initially treated with ICOTYDE.1
    • In ICONIC-LEAD, at week 16, 50% vs 21% of patients in the ICOTYDE vs PBO group achieved a Physician’s Global Assessment of fingernail (f-PGA) 0/1 response (treatment difference, 30.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.4-42.0; nominal P<0.001).4
      • At week 16, 24% vs 12% of patients in the ICOTYDE vs PBO group achieved an f-PGA 0 response (treatment difference, 11.9%; 95% CI, 0.2-22.0; nominal P<0.05).
      • At week 16, patients in the ICOTYDE group vs PBO group showed a 44% vs 2% mean mNAPSI improvement from baseline (treatment difference, 41.3%; 95% CI, 12.8-69.7; nominal P<0.01).

CLINICAL DATA

ICONIC-TOTAL

Gooderham et al (2025)1 and Lain et al (2025)3 evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral ICOTYDE 200 mg once daily in patients ≥12 years of age with plaque PsO affecting special sites (scalp, genitals, and/or hands/feet) in an ongoing phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study.

Study Design/Methods

  • Key inclusion criteria1:
    • Age ≥12 years with plaque PsO diagnosed for ≥26 weeks at screening; candidate for phototherapy or systemic therapy with an inadequate response to ≥1 topical therapy
    • Total body surface area (BSA) involvement ≥1% and an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥2
    • Involvement of ≥1 high-impact sites with at least moderate severity (scalp-specific IGA score ≥3, static Physician’s Global Assessment of Genitalia score ≥3, and Physician’s Global Assessment of hands and feet score ≥3)
  • Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive oral ICOTYDE 200 mg or PBO once daily, with PBO crossover to ICOTYDE at week 16.1
  • The primary and select secondary outcome measures are described in Table: Select ICONIC-TOTAL Outcome Measures at Week 16.1,3

Select ICONIC-TOTAL Outcome Measures at Week 161,3
Primary Endpoint
Percentage of patients who achieved an IGA score of clear (0) or minimal (1) and a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline
Select Secondary Endpoints
Percent change from baseline in mNAPSI score.
Abbreviations: IGA, Investigator’s Global Assessment; mNAPSI, modified Nail Psoriasis and Severity Index.

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • A total of 311 patients (ICOTYDE, n=208; PBO, n=103) were included in the study, with 64.3% being male and 78.1% being White. The mean age was 44.7 years (6 patients were ≥12 to <18 years).1
  • In the ICOTYDE and PBO groups, respectively, 41% and 54% of patients had nail PsO at baseline (mNAPSI score >0), with mean baseline mNAPSI scores of 24.4 for ICOTYDE and 14.6 for PBO.3
Efficacy
  • Primary endpoint: At week 16, 56.7% (118/208) vs 5.8% (6/103) of patients receiving ICOTYDE vs PBO, respectively, achieved an IGA 0/1 response (adjusted treatment difference, 51.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 42.1-58.8; P<0.001).1
  • Select endpoints are described in Table: Select ICONIC-TOTAL Endpoints.3

Select ICONIC-TOTAL Endpoints3
ICO
(n=78-81)
PBO
(n=52-54)
PBO→ICO Crossover
(n=46)
Mean mNAPSI improvement from baselinea, %
   Week 16
33
9
-
   Week 24
48
-
42
   Week 32
53
-
48
   Week 52
62
-
59
Abbreviations: ICO, ICOTYDE; mNAPSI, modified Nail Psoriasis and Severity Index; PBO, placebo.
aAmong patients with a baseline mNAPSI score >0.

Safety
  • Through week 16, 50% (105/208) of patients receiving ICOTYDE and 45% (46/103) of patients receiving PBO reported ≥1 adverse event (AE).3
  • Through week 52, 74% (153/208) of patients receiving ICOTYDE and 68% (204/300) of patients in the ICOTYDE combined group reported ≥1 AE (see Table: AEs in ICONIC-TOTAL Through Week 52).3
  • No new safety signals were identified through week 52.3

AEs in ICONIC-TOTAL Through Week 523
Weeks 0-16
Weeks 16-52
Through Week 52
ICO
(n=208)
PBO
(n=103)
PBO→ICO
(n=92)
ICO
(n=208)
ICO Combineda
(n=300)
Mean weeks/total PYs of follow-up
16.0/63.6
15.6/30.8
36.2/63.9
49.3/196.4
45.3/260.2
Any AE, n (%)
105 (50)
46 (45)
51 (55)
153 (74)
204 (68)
SAEs, n (%)
1 (<1)
2 (2)
1 (1)
6 (3)
7 (2)
AEs leading to discontinuation, n (%)
6 (3)
4 (4)
0
7 (3)
7 (2)
Infections, n (%)
59 (28)
23 (22)
39 (42)
106 (51)
145 (48)
Serious infections, n (%)
0
1 (1)
0
0
0
Gastrointestinal AEs, n (%)
15 (7)
8 (8)
7 (8)
21 (10)
28 (9)
Malignancyb, n (%)
1 (<1)
0
0
2 (1)
2 (1)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; ICO, ICOTYDE; PBO, placebo; SAE, serious adverse event; PY, patient-year.
aIncludes data for ICO-randomized patients through week 52 and for PBO→ICO patients from week 16 through week 52.
bMalignancy includes chronic lymphocytic leukemia and malignant melanoma in situ.

ICONIC-LEAD

Bissonnette et al (2025)2 and Soung et al (2025)4,5 evaluated the efficacy and safety of oral ICOTYDE 200 mg once daily in patients ≥12 years of age with moderate to severe plaque PsO in an ongoing phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled study with randomized withdrawal and retreatment.

Study Design/Methods

  • Key inclusion criteria2:
    • Age ≥12 years with moderate to severe plaque PsO diagnosed for ≥26 weeks before screening; candidate for phototherapy or systemic therapy
    • Total BSA involvement ≥10%
    • Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score ≥12
    • IGA score ≥3
  • Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either oral ICOTYDE 200 mg once daily or PBO, with PBO crossover to ICOTYDE at week 16.2
  • Coprimary endpoints: IGA 0/1 response with a ≥2-grade reduction from baseline to week 16 and PASI 90 response at week 16.2
  • Select subgroup analysis outcomes: f-PGA 0/1 and f-PGA 0 responses among patients with f-PGA ≥2 at baseline and mNAPSI percent improvement among patients with mNAPSI >0 at baseline.4

Results

Patient Characteristics
  • A total of 684 patients (ICOTYDE, n=456; PBO, n=228) were included in the study. Most patients were male (65%) and White (72%), with a mean age of 42.6 years.2
  • In the ICOTYDE and PBO groups, respectively, 30% and 29% had a f-PGA score ≥2, 43% and 44% had mNAPSI score >0, and mean baseline mNAPSI scores were 17.7 and 19.1.4
Efficacy – Overall Population
  • Coprimary endpoints: At week 16, in the ICOTYDE and PBO groups, respectively, 65% (295/456) and 8% (19/228) of patients achieved an IGA 0/1 response (adjusted treatment difference, 56.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 50.4-61.7; P<0.001). For PASI 90 response at week 16, 50% (226/456) of patients in the ICOTYDE group and 4% (10/228) of patients in the PBO group achieved a response (adjusted treatment difference, 45.1 percentage points; 95% CI, 39.5-50.4; P<0.001).2
Efficacy - High-Impact Site Involvement Subgroup Analysis

ICONIC-LEAD Subgroup Analysis - Select High-Impact Site Response Rates4
ICO
PBO
Treatment Difference, %
(95% CI)
Proportion of patients achieving endpointa, %
(n=137)
(n=66)
   f-PGA 0/1, %
      Week 16
50
21
30.1 (16.4-42.0)b
Nominal P<0.001c
      Week 24
64
-
-
   f-PGA 0, %
      Week 16
24
12
11.9 (0.2-22.0)b
Nominal P<0.05c
      Week 24
29
-
-
mNAPSId improvement from baseline (LSM), %
(n=187)
(n=98)
   Week 16
44
2
41.3 (12.8-69.7)e
Nominal P<0.01c
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CMH, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel; f-PGA, Physician’s Global Assessment of fingernail; ICO, ICOTYDE; LSM, least squares mean; MMRM, mixed-effect model repeated measure; mNAPSI, modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; PBO, placebo.
aAmong patients with a baseline f-PGA score ≥2.
bTreatment difference and 95% CI (using Miettinen-Nurminen method) were calculated adjusting for age group and baseline weight category for adults using Mantel-Haenszel weights.
cP-values were based on CMH chi-square test stratified by age group and baseline weight category for adults. These endpoints were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Therefore, the P-values displayed are nominal, and statistical significance has not been established.
dAmong patients with a baseline mNAPSI score >0.
eLSM, LSM difference, and P-value were based on the MMRM model with treatment group, visit, treatment group by visit interaction, age group, baseline weight, geographic region, baseline mNAPSI total score, and baseline mNAPSI total score by visit interaction as covariates.

Safety – Overall Population
  • Through week 16, 50% and 49% of patients in the ICOTYDE and PBO groups, respectively, reported ≥1 AE, with nasopharyngitis and upper respiratory tract infections being the most common.5
    • Through week 16, 23% (107/456) and 22% (51/228) of patients in the ICOTYDE and PBO groups, respectively, reported an infection.2
  • The ICOTYDE AE profile through week 52 was consistent with that observed through week 16 (see Table: AEs in the Overall ICONIC-LEAD Population Through Week 52).2,5,6

AEs in the Overall ICONIC-LEAD Population Through Week 522,5,6
Variable, n (%)
PBO-Controlled
(Adults and Adolescents)

Active Treatment
(Adults and Adolescents)
ICO Responders
Re-randomized at
Week 24 (Adults)

Weeks 0-16
Weeks 16-52
Weeks 0-52
Weeks 24-52
ICO
(n=456)
PBO
(n=228)
ICOa
(n=213)
ICO
(n=456)
ICO→ICO
(n=168)
ICO→PBOb
(n=172)
Follow-up duration, weeks, mean
15.9
15.8
35.3
43.4
27.7
27.8
Any AE
226 (50)
112 (49)
132 (62)
313 (69)
92 (55)
82 (48)
Most common AEs (≥5%)
   Nasopharyngitis
31 (7)
15 (7)
23 (11)
64 (14)
21 (12)
20 (12)
   URTI
30 (7)
16 (7)
24 (11)
52 (11)
9 (5)
15 (9)
SAEc
6 (1)
6 (3)
4 (2)
16 (4)
3 (2)
5 (3)
Serious infection
1 (<1)
0
1 (<1)
1 (<1)
0
1 (1)
AE leading to discontinuationd
6 (1)
1 (<1)
4 (2)
10 (2)
1 (1)
3 (2)
Gastrointestinal AEe
26 (6)
13 (6)
9 (4)
51 (11)
7 (4)
8 (5)
Active tuberculosis
0
0
0
0
0
0
Malignancyf
2 (<1)
0
0
2 (<1)
0
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; ICO, ICOTYDE; PBO, placebo; SAE, serious adverse event; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection.
aIncludes data after week 16 for PBO-randomized patients who crossed over to receive ICO.
bCombined withdrawal and retreatment group.
cSAEs through week 16 included acute cholecystitis, concussion, craniofacial fracture, pelvic fracture, worsening psoriasis, and hypertensive urgency in the PBO group and adenocarcinoma of the colon, prostate cancer, pancreatitis, bacterial gastroenteritis, arthralgia, and subarachnoid hemorrhage in the ICO group.
dAEs leading to discontinuation through week 16 included blood glucose increase in the PBO group and adenocarcinoma of the colon, prostate cancer, hypertriglyceridemia, subarachnoid hemorrhage, erectile dysfunction, and psoriasis in the ICO group.
eBased on gastrointestinal disorders system organ class.
fIncluded adenocarcinoma of the colon (1 patient who had a history of smoking; the patient reported mild gastroenteritis during screening, severe colitis starting on study day 7, and severe ileus on day 14 leading up to the diagnosis of grade 3 adenocarcinoma of the colon on day 19) and prostate cancer (1 patient who had a history of smoking and a family history of prostate cancer; this patient had an elevated prostate-specific antigen level before baseline and received a diagnosis of grade 1 prostate cancer on study day 48).

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 9 January 2026.

References

1 Gooderham M, Lain E, Bissonnette R, et al. Targeted oral peptide icotrokinra for psoriasis involving high-impact sites. NEJM Evid. 2025;4(12).  
2 Bissonnette R, Soung J, Hebert AA, et al. Oral icotrokinra for plaque psoriasis in adults and adolescents. N Engl J Med. 2025;393(18):1784-1795.  
3 Lain E, Warren RB, Gooderham M, et al. Durability of response to the targeted oral peptide icotrokinra for high-impact site psoriasis: 1-year ICONIC-TOTAL findings. Poster presented at: Fall Clinical Dermatology Conference; October 23-26, 2025; Las Vegas, NV.  
4 Soung J, Chih-ho Hong H, Ehst B, et al. Treatment of plaque psoriasis involving high-impact sites with icotrokinra: subgroup analyses of the phase 3, ICONIC-LEAD trial. Poster presented at: AAD Innovation Academy; July 10-13, 2025; Chicago, IL.  
5 Soung J, Cui Y, Bissonnette R, et al. Maintenance of response with icotrokinra, a targeted oral peptide, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: randomized treatment withdrawal in adults (weeks 24-52) and continuous treatment in adolescents (through week 52) from the phase 3, ICONIC-LEAD trial. Oral Presentation presented at: European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV); September 17-20, 2025; Paris, France.  
6 Bissonnette R, Soung J, Adelaide H, et al. Icotrokinra, a targeted oral peptide that selectively blocks the interleukin-23-receptor, for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results through week 24 of the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ICONIC-LEAD trial. Oral Presentation presented at: American Academy of Dermatology; March 7-11, 2025; Orlando, FL.