This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
Last Updated: 08/20/2026
Ji et al (2025)2 reported a retrospective disproportionality analysis of fetal disorder reports associated with AEDs identified from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database between the first quarter of 2004 and the fourth quarter of 2023. A total of 3046 reports of fetal disorders associated with AED exposure were included in the analysis. See Table: Signal Strength of Topamax-Related Fetal Disorders and Table: ROR and PRR Values for Fetal Diseases Associated with the Combined Use of 2 AEDs.
| Exposure Category | n | PRR (χ²) | ROR (95% CI) | IC (IC025) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monotherapy | 189 | 4.5 (513.3) | 4.6 (3.9-5.3) | 2.2 (1.9) |
| Monotherapy+polytherapy | 376 | 6.6 (1770.6) | 6.7 (6.1-7.4) | 2.7 (2.5) |
| Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IC, information component; PRR, proportional reporting ratio; ROR, reporting odds ratio. | ||||
| AED Combination With TOPAMAX | ROR Value (95% CI) | PRR Value (χ²) |
|---|---|---|
| TOPAMAX+Phenytoin | 8.2 (5.9-11.4) | 8.1 (210.3)a |
| TOPAMAX+Phenobarbital | 1.7 (0.8-3.9) | 1.7 (1.2)b |
| TOPAMAX+Valproic acid | 3.8 (2.6-5.5) | 3.8 (57)b |
| TOPAMAX+Carbamazepine | 8.3 (6.3-11) | 8.2 (309)a |
| TOPAMAX+Lamotrigine | 7.2 (5.7-9) | 7 (375.8)a |
| TOPAMAX+Oxcarbazepine | 5.1 (3.3-8.1) | 5.1 (58.3)a |
| TOPAMAX+Levetiracetam | 4.9 (3.8-6.3) | 4.9 (173.4) |
| TOPAMAX+Zonisamide | 1.3 (0.4-4.2) | 1.3 (0)b |
| TOPAMAX+Lacosamide | 0.5 (0.1-1.9) | 0.5 (0.7)b |
| Abbreviations: AED, antiepileptic drug; CI, confidence interval; PRR, proportional reporting ratio; ROR, reporting odds ratio. aHigher than the monotherapy of either drug. bLower than the monotherapy of either drug. | ||
Seo et al (2026)8
| Exposure Subgroup | Outcome | PS-Adjusted RR (95% CI) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subgroup 1: ASM-exposed pregnancies during the first trimester | Overall congenital malformation | 1.35 (0.76-2.4) | 0.3004 |
| Congenital heart defects | 1.11 (0.47-2.63) | 0.811 | |
| Limb defects | 3.50 (0.74-16.5) | 0.1133 | |
| Subgroup 4: ASM-exposed pregnancies during early and late pregnancy | Overall congenital malformation | 1.05 (0.61-1.82) | 0.8623 |
| Congenital heart defects | 0.92 (0.42-1.99) | 0.8255 | |
| Limb defects | 2.50 (0.5-12.61) | 0.267 | |
| Abbreviations: ASM, antiseizure medication; CI, confidence interval; PS, propensity score; RR, relative risk. | |||
| Exposure Subgroup | Outcome | PS-adjusted RR (95% CI) | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subgroup 1: ASM-exposed pregnancies during the first trimester | Overall congenital malformation | 1.04 (0.62-1.77) | 0.8746 |
| Heart defects | 1 (0.46-2.16) | 1 | |
| Limb defects | 1.5 (0.43-5.22) | 0.5237 | |
| Subgroup 2: ASM-exposed pregnancies during the early pregnancy | Overall congenital malformation | 0.67 (0.12-3.73) | 0.6446 |
| Heart defects | 2 (0.19-21) | 0.5634 | |
| Limb defects | -a | -b | |
| Subgroup 4: ASM-exposed pregnancies during early and late pregnancy | Overall congenital malformation | 1.30 (0.76-2.22) | 0.337 |
| Heart defects | 1.18 (0.55-2.55) | 0.6704 | |
| Limb defects | 1.5 (0.43-5.2) | 0.5229 | |
| Abbreviations: ASM, antiseizure medication; CI, confidence interval; PS, propensity score; RR, relative risk. aNumber of events is 0 in the drug-exposed group. bNot analyzed owing to 0 sample size. | |||
Sheehy et al (2026)9
Straub et al (2026)10 reported a population-based cohort study using the Medicaid Analytic eXtract/Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System Analytic Files (MAX/TAF; 2000-2018) and the Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database (MarketScan; 2003-2021). The study included publicly and commercially insured pregnant women with epilepsy and their live-born children. Children were classified as exposed if their mothers had filled at least one prescription for an ASM, either as monotherapy or polytherapy, during the second half of pregnancy. The analysis included 7245 unexposed and 10,345 ASM-exposed pregnancies in MAX/TAF and 1642 unexposed and 4648 ASM-exposed pregnancies in MarketScan. Among 23,880 eligible children, the average follow-up length was 3.4 years; 5,505 children were followed for ≥5 years and 2516 for ≥8 years. TOPAMAX exposure was associated with an increased risk of intellectual disability, with a hazard ratio of 3.3 (95% CI, 1.29-8.41). See Table: HRs (95% CIs) for Neurodevelopmental Disorders Associated With Prenatal TOPAMAX Exposure.
| Outcome | Number of Outcomes | HR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Topiramate (n=1036) | ||
| Any NDD | 145 | 1.13 (0.93-1.36) |
| Speech or language disorder | 75 | 1.1 (0.85-1.43) |
| ADHD | 63 | 1.13 (0.85-1.5) |
| Behavioral disorder | 35 | 1.03 (0.7-1.49) |
| Coordination disorder | <11 | 0.63 (0.3-1.34) |
| Autism spectrum disorder | 18 | 1.02 (0.6-1.74) |
| Learning difficulty | <11 | 1.23 (0.54-2.79) |
| Intellectual disability | <11 | 1.84 (0.75-4.51) |
| Abbreviations: ADHD, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NDD, neurodevelopmental disorder. | ||
Laspro et al (2025)11 used data from Epic Cosmos, a database containing deidentified electronic health records from healthcare institutions across the US, to analyze a population isolated from all patients on or after January 1, 2013, and before January 1, 2023. Gestational medication exposure was identified from medications prescribed, provider-administered, or reported by mothers at any time during pregnancy. A total of 12,098 newborns with available maternal pharmacologic data were identified. Among patients with OC, TOPAMAX was among the notable significant exposures reported during gestation (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.13-1.62). See Table: TOPAMAX Data from Cohort Subgroup Analyses (95% CIs).
| Outcome | Count | OR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Cleft lip (Q36.*) | 31 | 1.25 (0.88-1.78) |
| Any cleft lip (HTB) | 56 | 1.25 (0.96-1.63) |
| Isolated cleft lip | 15 | 1.45 (0.87-2.41) |
| Cleft palate (Q35.*) | 84 | 1.44 (1.16-1.78) |
| Any cleft palate | 102 | 1.63 (1.1-1.63) |
| Isolated cleft palate | 61 | 1.46 (1.13-1.88) |
| Cleft lip & palate | 41 | 1.19 (0.88-1.63) |
| Cleft palate with cleft lip (Q37.*) | 40 | 1.23 (0.9-1.68) |
| Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio. *Indicated any integer digits. | ||
Blotiere et al (2019)12
Mines et al (2014)13 conducted a retrospective cohort study using 4 large United States (US) healthcare databases. The study included women with an identifiable infant born between 1997 and 2010 and had at least 90 days of post-delivery enrollment. TOPAMAX exposure was identified using prescription claims data or Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) pharmacy records, with first-trimester exposure defined as mediation dispensed during or before the first trimester with sufficient supply extending into that period. Across all centers, 1945 TOPAMAX-exposed mother-infant dyads, 13,512 formerly exposed dyads, and 13,614 dyads with similar medical profiles (the two comparator cohorts) were identified. The pooled birth prevalence (95% CI) of OCs was 3.6 (0.9-6.3) per 1000 infants in the TOPAMAX cohort, 1.4 (0.8-2.1) per 1000 infants in the formerly exposed cohort, and 0.7 (0.2-1.1) per 1000 infants in the similar medical profiles cohort.
| Registry Study/Year Range | Patient Population | Outcomes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry: Ng et al (2026)14 Enrollment period: 1997-2024. | Eligible pregnancies included women who completed all three interviews, were exposed to at least one ASM during the first trimester, and had a live birth, stillbirth (>20 weeks' gestation), or pregnancy termination due to a fetal abnormality. | Risk of MCMs in Infants Exposed to First-Trimester TPM Polytherapy vs TPM Monotherapy | ||||||||||
| Cohort-wide (n=659) | ||||||||||||
| ASM regimen | Infant count, n | MCM, n (%)a (95% CI) | Unadjusted RR (95% CI) | Adjusted RRb (95% CI) | ||||||||
| TPM monotherapy | 517 | 27 (5.2) (3.6-7.5) | Reference | Reference | ||||||||
| LEV-TPM | 59 | 2 (3.4) (0.9-11.5) | 0.64 (0.1-2.2) | 0.50 (0.08-1.83) | ||||||||
| LTG-TPM | 83 | 6 (7.2) (3.4-14.9) | 1.41 (0.51-3.32) | 1.70 (0.59-4.32) | ||||||||
| North American Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry: Hernandez-Diaz et al (2025)15 Enrollment period: 1997-2023. | Pregnant women with ASM exposure during pregnancy and a live birth, stillbirth, or pregnancy termination due to fetal malformation. |
| ||||||||||
| Risk of Major Malformations in Infants Exposed to ASM Monotherapy During the First Trimester vs Unexposed Infants | ||||||||||||
| TPM (n=510) | ||||||||||||
| Major malformations, n (%) | Major malformations, 95% CI | Unexposed reference RRc | Active reference RR (95% CI) | |||||||||
| 26 (5.1) | 3.42-7.48 | 4.46 (2.38-8.34) | 2.41 (1.52-3.83) | |||||||||
| Prevalence of Most Common Specific Malformations Diagnosed Before 5 Days of Age Among Infants Exposed to Selected ASM Monotherapies With Over 10 Cases Identified From the North America Antiepileptic Drug Pregnancy Registry, 1997–2023, and Among an External Reference Population From Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston | ||||||||||||
| TPM (n=510) | ||||||||||||
| Major congenital anomalyc | n (%) | 95% CI | ||||||||||
| Hypospadiasd | 3 (1.14) | 0.29-3.56 | ||||||||||
| Cryptorchidismd | 1 (0.39) | 0.02-1.92 | ||||||||||
| Neural tube defects | 0 (0) | |||||||||||
| Cardiovascular anomalies | 2 (0.39) | 0.07-1.57 | ||||||||||
| Oral clefts | 7 (1.37) | 0.6-2.94 | ||||||||||
| UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register: Campbell et al (2013)16 Enrollment period: 1996-2011. | Women with two or more registered pregnancies were included. Only pregnancies with an unknown outcome at the time of registration that subsequently resulted in either a live birth or a pregnancy loss with a congenital malformation were included in the analysis. |
| ||||||||||
| Risk of Abnormalities in Pregnancies Exposed to Topiramate Following a Previous Abnormal Outcome | ||||||||||||
| Risk of CM in first pregnancy (monotherapy exposures), % | 27.3 | |||||||||||
| Total (n=83), n/N (%) | 3/6 (50) | |||||||||||
| Monotherapy, n/N (%) | 1/3 (33.3) | |||||||||||
| Polytherapy, n/N (%) | 2/3 (66.6) | |||||||||||
| Risk of Abnormalities Following Topiramate Exposure in Pregnancies After One Normal Pregnancy Outcome | ||||||||||||
| Risk of congenital malformation in first pregnancy (monotherapy exposures), % | 27.3 | |||||||||||
| Total (n=83), n/N (%) | 2/18 (11.1) | |||||||||||
| Monotherapy, n/N (%) | 2/8 (25) | |||||||||||
| Polytherapy, n/N (%) | 0/10 (0) | |||||||||||
| Australian Register of Antiepileptic Drugs in Pregnancy: Vajda et al (2017)17 Enrollment period: 1999-2014. | Pregnancies in Australian women receiving AEDs (primarily for epilepsy) or in women with epilepsy not receiving AEDs during the first 4 months of pregnancy. |
| ||||||||||
| West China Registry of Pregnancy in Epilepsy: Hao et al (2025)18 Enrollment period: since 2012. | Women with confirmed epilepsy who were planning pregnancy or were in the first trimester. |
| ||||||||||
| Cohen et al (2024)19 Data were obtained from Denmark (1997-2017), Finland (1996-2016), Iceland (2003-2017), Norway (2004-2020), Sweden (2005-2019), the United States (MAX, 2000-2014; MarketScan, 2003-2015), and Australia (NSW, 2006-2012). | Pregnant women with epilepsy identified using country-specific algorithms whose pregnancies had complete prescription data from 3 months before pregnancy through birth, maternal diagnoses before and during pregnancy, and linked infant outcomes. | Number and Percentage of Pregnancies With an MCM for LTG-TPM Duotherapy | ||||||||||
| Database | Total, n | MCM, n (%)e | ||||||||||
| Denmark | 39 | <5 (-) | ||||||||||
| Nordicf | 61 | 7 (11.5) | ||||||||||
| MAX | 56 | <11 (-) | ||||||||||
| MKSN | 19 | 0 | ||||||||||
| MUMS | 11 | <5 (-) | ||||||||||
| All cohorts | 186 | - | ||||||||||
| Abbreviations: AED, antiepileptic drug; ASM, antiseizure medication; CI, confidence interval; CM, congenital malformation; LEV, levetiracetam; LTG, lamotrigine; MAX, Medicaid Analytic eXtract database; MCM, major congenital malformation; MKSN, Marketscan database; MUMS, Maternal Use of Medications and Safety database from New South Wales, Australia; NSW, New South Wales; OC, oral cleft; RR, relative risk; TPM, TOPAMAX. aPercentage of infant with MCM count in each monotherapy or polytherapy group. bAdjusting for maternal age, marital status, and calendar year of last menstrual period. cRR of major malformations compared with both unexposed and LTG groups. dRestricted to malformations diagnosed before 5 days of age, including elective terminations, to be comparable with the external reference population. Some infants had more than 1 defect. eRestricted to male infants. Excludes mild glandular hypospadias. eSmall cell counts cannot be published and thus limited calculation of the exact percentage and sum of the total for all cohorts. fNordic refers to the pooled database containing pregnancies from Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden. | ||||||||||||
Additional registry citations have been identified in the published literature.4
Kacirova (2021)23
TOPAMAX levels ranged from 1.0 to 7.1 mg/L in maternal serum and from 0.8 to 6.2 mg/L in umbilical cord serum. The mean umbilical cord/maternal serum ratio was 0.93
TOPAMAX concentrations 3-4 days post-delivery ranged from 1.4-8.4 mg/L in maternal serum, 1.5-8.6 mg/L in breast milk, and 0.3-4.4 mg/L in infant serum. Significant correlations were found between milk and maternal serum levels (P=0.0001) and infant serum and maternal levels (P=0.0009). The mean breast milk/maternal serum ratio was 0.99±0.45 and the infant/maternal serum ratio was 0.25±0.15. The infant/maternal serum ratio was significantly lower than the milk/maternal serum ratio (P<0.0001).
At 7-30 days post-delivery, maternal serum levels varied from 1.9 to 9.7 mg/L, milk levels ranged from 2.3 to 10.6 mg/L and infant serum levels ranged from 0.3 to 6.5 mg/L. Paired breast milk and maternal serum levels were not significantly different (P=0.8712). The mean milk/maternal serum ratio was 1.07±0.31, and the mean infant/maternal serum ratio was 0.51±0.27. Sixty percent of maternal serum concentrations were in the reference range used for the general epileptic population (5-20 mg/L).24
Ohman (2002)25
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 30 June 2026. Additional relevant citations identified in the published literature are provided here for your reference.26
| 1 | TOPAMAX (topiramate) [Prescribing Information]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc; https://www.jnjlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/TOPAMAX-pi.pdf |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 | |
| 16 | |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | |
| 21 | |
| 22 | |
| 23 | |
| 24 | |
| 25 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 28 | |
| 29 |
Would you like to clear and leave your conversation? Message history will be lost.