Authors: Lisa Harding1, Ibrahim Turkoz2, Larry Martinez2, Clairissa Cruz2
For Hispanic and Latino adults with TRD, long-term esketamine treatment may provide sustained symptom improvement and functional benefits, with no new safety concerns, supporting its use as a viable long-term treatment option in this population.
To evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of esketamine nasal spray, used with an oral antidepressant, specifically in Hispanic and Latino adults with TRD participating in the SUSTAIN-3 extension study.
This was a subgroup analysis of Hispanic and Latino adults enrolled in SUSTAIN-3, an open-label, multicenter extension study. Participants received flexible-dose esketamine plus an oral antidepressant during induction (4-weeks) and long-term maintenance phases, with ongoing efficacy and safety assessments.
SUSTAIN-3 was a multicenter, open-label, long-term extension study (up to 6.5 years). Participants entered from one of six prior esketamine studies and received flexible doses of esketamine nasal spray (56 or 84 mg) plus an oral antidepressant. The study included an induction phase and an optimization/maintenance phase. Depression severity, functioning, and safety were assessed repeatedly over time using validated clinician- and patient-reported scales. This analysis focused on Hispanic and Latino adults aged 18-64 years.
Study design

Efficacy was measured by:
This analysis included 182 patients. Mean MADRS and PHQ-9 total scores entering induction phase were 28.9 and 14.8, respectively; 83.5% were female and mean age was 48.6. Patients showed clinically meaningful reductions in depressive symptoms and functional impairment during induction, with improvements maintained over long-term treatment.
Baseline symptoms rating scale scores

Mean (SD) change in symptom rating scales during the induction phase
Rates of MADRS response and remission

The safety profile was consistent with previously known esketamine effects. Most patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) during the study (95.6%), and most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity and were resolved on the same day as dosing.
The most common TEAEs were::
The study lacked a control group and was open-label, limiting causal inference. This was a subgroup analysis not powered for Hispanic/Latino-specific comparisons. Generalizability may be limited due to exclusion of patients with significant comorbidities or substance dependence and potential continuation bias.
1Depression MD, Milford, CT; 2Johnson & Johnson, Titusville, NJ
Presented at the American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting; May 16-20, 2026; San Francisco, California, USA (This study was funded by Johnson & Johnson).
AI was used in the preparation of this Plain Language Summary (PLS).
Scan the QR code for the full poster
