J&J Medical Connect
TECVAYLI®

(teclistamab-cqyv)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TECVAYLI - Use in Renal Impairment

Last Updated: 04/14/2026

SUMMARY

  • Please refer to the local labeling for relevant information on use in renal impairment.
  • MajesTEC-1 is a phase 1/2, multicohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TECVAYLI in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1,2
    • Per protocol, patients enrolled in the study were required to have adequate renal function during the screening phase described as: serum creatinine ≤1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance (CrCl) ≥40 mL/min/1.73 m2 or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥40 mL/min/1.73 m2 based upon Modified Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula calculation.2
  • Hameed et al (2026)3,4 published a retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TECVAYLI in RRMM patients with and without baseline renal impairment.
  • Tokarski et al (2026)5 presented a retrospective, single-center analysis describing outcomes with TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM and severe renal insufficiency (CrCl <40 mL/min).
  • Parekh et al (2026)6 presented a multicenter retrospective study evaluating real‑world outcomes of TECVAYLI in RRMM patients with and without severe renal failure using the TriNetX research network.
  • Charkviani et al (2025)7,8 published a retrospective, observational cohort study describing the incidence, severity, and associated outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with RRMM treated with TECVAYLI compared to patients treated with B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy.
  • Dima et al (2025)9,10 published a multicenter, retrospective study describing the outcomes of TECVAYLI treatment in patients with RRMM and renal impairment.
  • Lebreton et al (2024)11 published a retrospective analysis describing the safety and efficacy of TECVAYLI in 15 patients with RRMM on dialysis treated in France through an early access program.
  • Additional case series and case reports have been summarized and are included below for your reference.12-16

product labeling

There were no clinically significant differences in the exposure of teclistamab-cqyv based on mild or moderate renal impairment (eGFR by MDRD method: 30 to 89 mL/minute). The effects of severe renal impairment (eGFR less than 30 mL/minute) on the exposures of teclistamab-cqyv are unknown.17

retrospective studIES

Hameed et al (2026)3,4 published a retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of TECVAYLI in RRMM patients with and without baseline renal impairment.

Study Design/Methods

  • This retrospective, multi-institutional analysis was conducted across 7 academic centers in United States (US) in collaboration with the US Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC) in patients treated with TECVAYLI between August 2022 to June 2024.
  • The study included patients with RRMM, with or without renal impairment.
  • Renal impairment was defined as a CrCl of <40 mL/min.
  • Treatment responses were evaluated using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria.
  • Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.03, while cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) were graded per the American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy consensus criteria.

Results

Baseline Characteristics


Select Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics in Patients With RRMM (With and Without RI)4 
Characteristic
Without RI
(n=161)

With RI
(n=34)

Total
(N=195)

Median age, years (range)
69 (62-73)
71 (64-76)
-
Kappa/Lambda, n (%)
   Kappa
90 (56)
17 (50)
107 (55)
   Lambda
62 (39)
17 (50)
79 (41)
   NA
8 (5)
1 (3)
9 (5)
Cytogenetics, n (%)
   High
74 (46)
19 (2)
93 (47)
   Standard
84 (52)
15 (44)
99 (51)
   Unknown
3 (2)
0
3 (2)
Number of lines of therapy prior to TECVAYLI, n (%)
   1
57 (35)
10 (29)
67 (34)
   2
104 (65)
24 (71)
128 (66)
Double refractory, n (%)
   No
24 (15)
7 (21)
31 (16)
   Yes
137 (85)
27 (79)
164 (84)
Triple RRMM, n (%)
   No
31 (19)
9 (26)
40 (21)
   Yes
130 (81)
25 (74)
155 (79)
Penta refractory, n (%)
   No
82 (51)
20 (59)
102 (52)
   Yes
79 (49)
14 (41)
93 (48)
ORR, n (%)
   No
57 (35)
15 (44)
72 (37)
   Yes
103 (64)
19 (56)
122 (63)
ECOG ≥2, n (%)
   No
135 (84)
24 (71)
159 (82)
   Yes
26 (16)
10 (29)
36 (18)
Abbreviations: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; ORR, Overall Response Rate; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; RI, renal impairment.

Efficacy


Select Efficacy Outcomes in Patients With RRMM and RI4 
Characteristic
With RI (PFS Univariate Analysis)
(N=34)

n
HR
95% CI
Kappa/Lambda, n (%)
   Kappa
17
-
-
   Lambda
17
1.02
0.42-2.52
Cytogenetics, n (%)
   High
19
-
-
   Standard
15
0.68
0.27-1.73
Number of lines of therapy prior to TECVAYLI, n (%)
34
1
0.84-1.19
   1
10
-
-
   2
24
0.74
0.28-1.96
Double refractory, n (%)
   No
7
-
-
   Yes
27
5.16
0.68-38.9
Triple RRMM, n (%)
   No
9
-
-
   Yes
25
3.18
0.73-13.9
Penta refractory, n (%)
   No
20
-
-
   Yes
14
0.89
0.36-2.24
ORR, n (%)
   No
15
-
-
   Yes
19
0
0.00-Inf
ECOG ≥2, n (%)
   No
24
-
-
   Yes
10
1.81
0.71-4.63
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; HR, hazard ratio; ORR, overall response rate; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma; RI, renal impairment.

Safety


CRS and ICANS Events in Patients With RRMM (With and Without RI)3,4 
Parameter
Without RI
(n=161)

With RI
(n=34)

CRS
   Any grade, %
52.5
43.8
   Grade ≥3, %
1.2
2.9
   Median time to CRS onset, days
3.8
4.5
   Median CRS duration, days
1.6
1.1
ICANS, %
   Any grade, %
10.6
14.6
   Grade ≥3, %
3
1
Tocilizumab treatmenta, n (%)
44 (27)
12 (35)
Number of tocilizumab treatmentsa, % (range)
0.34 (0.00-4.00)
0.41 (0.00-2.00)
Recurrent CRS after tocilizumab doses, n (%)
8 (5.0)
1 (2.9)
Dexamethasone treatmenta, n (%)
45 (28)
4 (12)
Neuropathya, n (%)
3 (1.9)
2 (5.9)
Abbreviations: CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; RI, renal impairment.
aEvaluated in 195 patients.


Hematological Events in Patients With RRMM (With and Without RI)4 
AE, n (%)
Without RI
(n=161)

With RI
(n=34)

Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Grade 1
Grade 2
Grade 3
Grade 4
Day 30 (n=175)
Leukopenia
35 (24)
26 (18)
7 (4.7)
3 (2.0)
3 (11)
3 (11)
3 (11)
0 (0)
Anemia
38 (26)
35 (24)
14 (9.5)
1 (0.7)
10 (37)
8 (30)
2 (7.4)
0 (0)
Neutropenia
17 (11)
13 (8.8)
12 (8.1)
5 (3.4)
3 (11)
0 (0)
2 (7.4)
1 (3.7)
Thrombocytopenia
33 (22)
21 (14)
10 (6.8)
9 (6.1)
9 (33)
2 (7.4)
4 (15)
0 (0)
Day 90 (n=125)
Leukopenia
21 (20)
7 (6.6)
3 (2.8)
1 (0.9)
1 (5.3)
1 (5.3)
2 (11)
0 (0)
Anemia
26 (25)
13 (12)
3 (2.8)
-
6 (32)
3 (16)
2 (11)
-
Neutropenia
8 (7.5)
6 (5.7)
4 (3.8)
5 (4.7)
0 (0)
2 (11)
2 (11)
0 (0)
Thrombocytopenia
31 (29)
5 (4.7)
2 (1.9)
1 (0.9)
2 (11)
2 (11)
1 (5.3)
0 (0)
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; RI, renal impairment; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Infections in Patients With RRMM (With and Without RI)4 
Parameter, n (%)
N=195
Without RI
(n=161)

With RI
(n=34)

Any infection
74 (46)
15 (44)
Severe infection
28 (17)
10 (29)
GCSF support
33 (20)
6 (18)
IVIG use
91 (57)
13 (38)
PRBC transfusion
39 (24)
17 (50)
Platelet transfusion
25 (16)
7 (21)
Abbreviations: G-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; PRBC, packed red blood cells; RI, renal impairment; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Hospitalization in Patients With RRMM (With and Without RI)4 
Parameter
N=195
Without RI
(n=161)

With RI
(n=34)

Hospitalization at first TECVAYLI dosea, n (%)
159 (99)
33 (97)
Hospitalization at subsequent TECVAYLI doses, n (%)
42 (26)
11 (32)
Frequency of ICU admission during stepup dosing, %
2.5
8.8
Frequency of dose delays, %
33
35
Abbreviations: ICU, intensive care unit; RI, renal impairment; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.
aFor median of 7 days.


Etiology of Mortality in Patients With RRMM (With and Without RI)4 
Parameter, n (%)
N=195
Without RI
(n=161)

With RI
(n=34)

Progressive disease
36 (22)
13 (38)
Neurotoxicity
2 (1)
1 (3)
Respiratory failure/pneumonia
7 (4)
NA
Infection without sepsis
2 (1)
NA
COVID
1 (1)
NA
Sepsis/septic shock
2 (1)
1 (3)
Subarachnoid hemorrhage
NA
1 (3)
Unknown
2 (1)
NA
Bilateral pulmonary embolism/atrial thrombus
1 (1)
NA
Pneumatosis intestinalis
1 (1)
NA
Cytomegalovirus viremia
1 (1)
1 (3)
Multiorgan failure
NA
1 (3)
Cirrhosis
1 (1)
NA
Ventricular fibrillation
NA
1 (3)
Acute myeloid leukemia
1(1)
NA
Abbreviations: COVID, coronavirus disease 2019; NA, not applicable; RI, renal impairment; RRMM, relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Tokarski et al (2026)5 presented a retrospective, single-center analysis describing outcomes with TECVAYLI in patients with RRMM and severe renal insufficiency (CrCl <40 mL/min).

Study Design/Methods

  • This retrospective, single-center analysis included 3 patients with RRMM and renal insufficiency who were treated with TECVAYLI at OhioHealth between October 2022 to September 2025.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

  • Baseline characteristics of patients with RRMM and renal insufficiency treated with only TECVAYLI are presented in Table: Baseline Characteristics.

Baseline Characteristics5
Parameter
Patient 1
Patient 4
Patient 6
Age
67
77
82
Sex
M
M
M
Line of therapy
8th line
5th line
9th line
MM type, mg/dL
KLC
LLC
IgA lambda
   KLC
3726
3.07
1.63
   LLC
-
13,765
177.31
L/K ratio
-
17,206
108
M protein, mg/dL
-
-
500
CrCl, mL/min
13
19
42
Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; IgA, immunoglobulin A; KLC, kappa light chain; LLC, lambda light chain; L/K, lambda/kappa; MM, multiple myeloma.

Treatment Exposure

  • All 3 patients received TECVAYLI at the usual prescribed dose.
  • Patient 4 received 3 cycles of VD-PACE (bortezomib, dexamethasone, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide) for cytoreduction prior to TECVAYLI.

Efficacy

  • All patients achieved a clinical response within 1 month (time to first response [TTFR]=1 month).
  • Responses observed:
    • Patient 1: Achieved stringent complete response (sCR).
    • Patient 4: Achieved very good partial response (VGPR).
    • Patient 6: Achieved partial response (PR).

Safety

  • No CRS and ICANS events were reported in any TECVAYLI-treated patient.
  • Improvement in renal function was observed:
    • Patient 1: CrCl improved from 13 to 23 mL/min.
    • Patient 4: CrCl improved from 19 to 33 mL/min.
    • Patient 6: renal parameters improved (numeric post-treatment CrCl not specified).
  • Progression was reported in 2 patients:
    • Patient 1: biochemical progression after 26 cycles and started talquetamab on 8 September 2025.
    • Patient 4: progression after 5 cycles.

Parekh et al (2026)6 presented a multicenter retrospective study evaluating real‑world outcomes of TECVAYLI in RRMM patients with and without severe renal failure using the TriNetX research network.

Study Design/Methods

  • A multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the TriNetX database network, a federated deidentified electronic medical record (EMR) network.
  • The study included adult patients with a history of RRMM who received TECVAYLI between July 1, 2022, and October 1, 2025.
  • Renal failure was defined as eGFR <30 mL/min or dialysis dependence.
  • Statistical analyses were performed on the TriNetX research platform.
  • Baseline patient demographics and clinical features were collected from the network.
  • The cohort was divided into two groups: renal failure group and nonrenal failure group.
  • Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed using greedy nearest‑neighbor matching without replacement and a caliper of 0.1.
  • Outcomes were calculated using TECVAYLI use as the index event.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

  • A total of 1531 patients were included in the study, with 239 patients in the renal failure group and 1292 patients in the nonrenal failure group.
  • Overall, the average age at index was 69.4±10.3 years, 53% were male, and 62.5% were White.
  • At baseline, more extramedullary disease was reported in the renal failure group as compared to the nonrenal failure group (7.5% vs 5.3%).
  • Fifty‑nine patients in the renal failure group were on dialysis.
  • Propensity matching (1:1) was performed for age, sex, race, cardiovascular disease, stroke, chronic lung disease, obesity, ECOG performance status, and other baseline factors, yielding 456 patients in the final matched cohort (228 patients in each group).
  • The mean follow‑up duration was 314 days for the renal failure group and 354 days for the nonrenal failure comparison group.

Safety

  • The renal failure group had 70 deaths compared with 60 deaths in the nonrenal failure group (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.906-1.808; P=0.3168).
  • Any‑grade CRS was reported in 57 patients in the renal failure group and 65 patients in the nonrenal failure group (odds ratio [OR], 0.629; 95% CI, 0.542-1.251; P=0.291).
  • ICANS events were reported in 22 patients in the renal failure group and 29 patients in nonrenal failure group (OR, 0.518; 95% CI, 0.296-1.167; P=0.14).
  • Grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS combined were <10 events in each group.
  • Within 30 days of treatment:
    • Neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count <1000 cells/µL) was reported in 106 patients in the renal failure group and 105 patients in the nonrenal failure group (OR, 1.018; 95% CI, 0.704-1.471; P=0.925).
    • Thrombocytopenia (platelets <50,000 cells/µL) was reported in 87 in the renal failure group and 77 in the nonrenal failure group (OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.825-1.775; P=0.329).
    • Anemia (hemoglobin <7.0 g/dL) occurred in 87 in the renal failure group and 68 in the nonrenal failure group (OR, 1.452; 95% CI, 0.983-2.144; P=0.063).

Charkviani et al (2025)7,8published a retrospective, observational cohort study describing the incidence, severity, and associated outcomes of AKI in patients with RRMM treated with TECVAYLI compared to patients treated with BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy.

Study Design/Methods

  • The study included consecutive patients with RRMM who received at least 1 dose of TECVAYLI or received BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy (idecabtagene vicleucel or ciltacabtagene autoleucel) between December 1, 2022, and May 15, 2023. Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD; defined as those who had been on maintenance hemodialysis [HD] for >3 months before starting treatment) at treatment initiation were excluded. Patients were followed until August 1, 2023.
  • Primary endpoint: incidence of AKI during follow-up.
  • Secondary endpoints: clinical and laboratory characteristics before, during, and after AKI events, including AKI severity and renal recovery; electrolyte levels following treatment initiation; and hematologic response and mortality during follow-up.
  • TECVAYLI dosing: step-up doses (SUDs) of TECVAYLI (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg subcutaneously [SC]) were administered 2 to 4 days apart and completed 2 to 4 days prior to the first treatment dose of TECVAYLI 1.5 mg/kg SC. Subsequent treatment doses included TECVAYLI 1.5 mg/kg SC weekly (QW).
  • AKI was defined according to Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria as an increase in the serum creatinine levels ≥1.5 times the baseline value following initiation of therapy. The severity of AKI was classified based on the KDIGO staging system.

Results

Treatment Disposition, Baseline Characteristics, and Disease Characteristics

  • A total of 64 patients with RRMM were included in this study; 34 patients received TECVAYLI, and 30 patients received CAR-T therapy. Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table: Select Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics.
  • The average follow-up duration was 148 days (standard deviation [SD], 6.4) after treatment initiation.

Select Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics7
Characteristic
TECVAYLI Group
(n=34)

CAR-T Group
(n=30)

Total
(N=64)

P Value
Median age, years (IQR)
66.4 (55.4-70.8)
66.1 (61.9-71.9)
66.2 (59.6-71.3)
0.46
HTN, n (%)
12 (35.3)
10 (33.3)
22 (34.4)
0.87
CKD, n (%)
5 (14.7)
5 (16.7)
10 (15.6)
0.83
Diabetes, n (%)
3 (8.8)
4 (13.3)
7 (10.9)
0.56
Number of prior lines of therapy, median (IQR)
8 (6-13)
7 (5-10)
8 (6-10)
0.025
Prior CAR-T therapy, n (%)
18 (53)
-
-
-
Creatinine (mg/dL), median (IQR)
0.88 (0.78-1.08)
1.01 (0.75-1.21)
0.97 (0.78-1.14)
0.21
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2), median (IQR)
90.9 (68.2-99.0)
74.6 (55.1-96.5)
86.5 (60.8-98.1)
0.15
Involved free light chains (mg/dL), median (IQR)
13.3 (3.0-52.9)
11.4 (1.1-33.0)
12.3 (2.2-43.6)
0.21
Proteinuria, n (%)
-
-
-
0.075
   Missing
10
19
29
-
   No
12 (50.0)
2 (18.2)
14 (40.0)
-
   Yes
12 (50.0)
9 (81.8)
21 (60.0)
-
High-risk cytogenetics, n (%)
28 (84.8)
23 (82.1)
51 (83.6)
-
Bone marrow percentage in plasma cells, median (IQR)
4.90 (0.0-9.3)
8.50 (0.0-20.0)
4.90 (0.0-20.0)
0.44
Abbreviations: CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell; CKD, chronic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HTN, hypertension; IQR, interquartile range.

Incidence of AKI and Associated Outcomes

  • A total of 14 AKI events were reported during follow-up. Ten events were reported in the TECVAYLI group (stage 1, n=6; stage 2, n=3; stage 3, n=1) and 4 events were reported in the CAR-T group (stage 1, n=3; stage 2, n=1) groups.
  • Hematologic response and incidence of AKI are detailed in Table: Hematologic Response and Incidence of AKI.
  • AKI-free survival estimates at 180 days post-treatment were 68% (95% CI, 53-87) in the TECVAYLI group and 90% (95% CI, 79-100) in the CAR-T group.
  • In the TECVAYLI group, the incidence of AKI was associated with higher involved free light chains (FLC) at baseline (HR per 10-unit increase, 1.03 [95% CI, 1.01-1.05]; P=0.002).
  • In the TECVAYLI group, 8 of the 10 patients with AKI events developed AKI while receiving TECVAYLI QW; 2 patients developed AKI after treatment discontinuation.

Hematologic Response and Incidence of AKI8
Hematologic Response at Last Follow-Up Date, n (%)
TECVAYLI Groupa
CAR-T Groupb
No AKI
(n=24)

AKI
(n=10)

No AKI
(n=26)

AKI
(n=4)

Minimal response or stable disease
1 (4)
1 (10)
1 (4)
1 (25)
Partial response or VGPR
12 (50)
2 (20)
15 (58)
1 (25)
Progressive disease
11 (46)
7 (70)
10 (38)
2 (50)
Abbreviations: AKI, acute kidney injury; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; VGPR, very good partial response.
aP=0.26
bP=0.21

Serum Creatinine and eGFR Trends

  • The serum creatinine levels appeared to improve in both groups with no significant difference in creatinine levels observed before, during, or after the onset of AKI. Similar results were observed for eGFR levels.

Renal Recovery in Patients With AKI

  • In the 10 TECVAYLI patients who experienced AKI during follow-up, 4 patients (40%) had complete renal recovery, 4 patients (40%) had partial recovery, 1 patient (10%) had no recovery, and 1 patient (10%) died shortly after AKI.
  • In the 4 CAR-T patients who experienced AKI during follow-up, 2 patients (50%) had complete renal recovery, and 2 patients (50%) had partial recovery.
  • Among the 6 patients with renal recovery, the median time to recovery was 26 days (interquartile range [IQR], 23-28).
  • No patients in either group required renal replacement therapy during follow-up.

Clinical Characteristics in Patients With AKI

  • In the TECVAYLI patients who developed AKI, a possible prerenal cause for the AKI was identified in 4 patients, among whom 3 resolved in <72 hours. Sustained AKI (lasting >72 hours) was noted in 6 patients. A total of 8 patients had progressive disease and did not respond to treatment (4 of these patients had rising FLC with a concurrent increase in creatinine). Hydration (n=4) and kidney function monitoring (n=4) were the main interventions for AKI.
  • In CAR-T patients who developed AKI, 1 patient was associated with each of the following: CRS, nephrotoxin exposure, hypercalcemia, and volume depletion. Progressive disease was noted in 3 of 4 patients.
  • In the 10 TECVAYLI patients who experienced AKI, 5 patients had previously received CAR-T therapy (no patients experienced AKI during their prior CAR-T therapy), 3 patients were classified as high-risk due to chromosomal abnormalities, and 2 patients were considered standard risk.
  • The FLC level continued to rise after AKI in the TECVAYLI group.

Mortality in Patients With AKI

  • Nine patients died (64%; n=8, TECVAYLI group; n=1, CAR-T group) after a median of 30 days (IQR, 10-39) after their AKI event; 4 patients died (n=2, TECVAYLI group; n=2, CAR-T group) without experiencing an AKI event.

Incidence of CRS in Patients With AKI

  • Overall, a total of 30 CRS events were reported after treatment initiation (n=8 [24%], TECVAYLI group; n=22 [73%], CAR-T group).
  • None of the patients in the TECVAYLI group who developed AKI had CRS at the time of the event; 1 CAR-T therapy-treated patient had CRS during the AKI event.

Dima et al (2025)9,10 published a multicenter, retrospective study describing the outcomes of TECVAYLI treatment in patients with RRMM and renal impairment.

Study Design/Methods

  • This study included patients with RRMM who received TECVAYLI under a commercial Food and Drug Administration (FDA) label at 13 academic centers participating in the US Multiple Myeloma (MM) Immunotherapy Consortium. The data cutoff date was April 30, 2024.
  • Renal impairment was defined as CrCl <40 mL/min at the time of TECVAYLI initiation. Severe renal impairment was defined as CrCl <30 mL/min or as being on dialysis.
  • TECVAYLI dosing: SUDs of TECVAYLI (0.06 mg/kg SC and 0.3 mg/kg SC) were administered prior to the first treatment dose of TECVAYLI 1.5 mg/kg SC. Subsequent dosing frequency was at the discretion of the treating physician. For patients on dialysis, TECVAYLI was given after dialysis if it was scheduled on the same day.

Results

Patient Demographics

  • A total of 384 consecutive patients were included in this study. At TECVAYLI initiation, 81 patients (21%) had renal impairment, and 45 patients (18%) had severe renal impairment, including 18 patients (5%) who were on dialysis. A documented history of cast nephropathy (either clinically diagnosed or with biopsy) before TECVAYLI initiation was noted in 44% of patients (n=36) with renal impairment.
  • Baseline patient characteristics are presented in Table: Select Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics.

Select Baseline Demographics and Clinical Characteristics9
Parameter
Renal Impairment Group
(n=81)

No Renal Impairment Group
(n=303)

P Value
Age, years, median (IQR)
71 (63.9-76)
67 (60.2-72.1)
0.002
Light chain type, n (%)
   Kappa
46 (57)
194 (64)
0.47
   Lambda
35 (43)
106 (35)
-
   Biclonal
0
1 (0.3)
-
   Nonsecretory
0
2 (0.6)
-
High-risk cytogeneticsa, n (%)
48 (59)
164 (54)
-
Extramedullary diseaseb, n (%)
18 (22)
82 (27)
0.45
Triple-class refractoryc, n (%)
64 (79)
257 (85)
0.27
Penta-class refractoryd, n (%)
31 (38)
113 (37)
0.97
Number of prior lines of therapy, median (IQR)e
7 (5-9)
6 (5-8)
0.04
Prior autologous SCT, n (%)
49 (60.5)
205 (70)
0.28
Prior BCMA-directed therapy, n (%)
37 (46)
155 (51)
0.45
Cytopenias at baseline, n (%)
Any-grade neutropeniaf
16 (20)
76 (26)
0.3
      Grade ≥3 neutropeniaf
4 (5)
22 (7.4)
0.5
Any-grade anemiag
74 (93)
222 (74)
<0.001
      Grade ≥3 anemiag
24 (30)
45 (15)
0.002
   Any-grade thrombocytopeniag
58 (73)
165 (55)
0.005
      Grade ≥3 thrombocytopeniag
20 (25)
46 (15)
0.044
Abbreviations: BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; EMD, extramedullary disease; IQR, interquartile range; mAb, monoclonal antibody; MM, multiple myeloma; PI, proteasome inhibitor; SCT, stem cell transplantation.
aHigh-risk cytogenetics comprised positivity for any of the following on fluorescence in situ hybridization before TECVAYLI initiation: del17p, t(14;16), t(4;14) and/or gain/amplification 1q.
bDefined as bone independent-only tumors of plasma cells growing at anatomic sites outside of the bone marrow before TECVAYLI initiation. Bone-dependent and paraskeletal plasmacytomas were not considered EMD.
c≥1 PI, ≥1 immunomodulatory drug, and ≥1 anti-CD38 mAb.
d≥2 PIs, ≥2 immunomodulatory drugs, and ≥1 anti-CD38 mAb.
eEvaluated in 374 patients.
fEvaluated in 80 patients in the Renal Impairment group and in 298 patients in the no Renal Impairment group.
gEvaluated in 80 patients in the Renal Impairment group and in 299 patients in the no Renal Impairment group.

Efficacy

  • The median follow-up for all cohorts was 9.9 months (95% CI, 9.5-10.6). Efficacy outcomes are detailed in Table: Efficacy Outcomes.

Efficacy Outcomes9,10 
Responsea
Patients
Without Renal Impairment
(n=303)

Patients With Renal Impairment (CrCl <40 mL/min)
(n=81)

P Value
Patients With Severe Renal Impairment
(CrCl <30 mL/min)
(n=45)

Patients on Dialysis
(n=18)

ORR, %
56
52
0.61
60
55.5
   PR
10
5
-
4.5
5.5
   VGPR
22
27
-
35.5
22
≥CR, %
24
20
0.53
20
28
≥VGPR, %
46
47
0.92
-
50
Median PFSb, months (95% CI)
6.5
(5.5-8.7)

4.6
(2.9-10.7)

0.62
7.8
(4.3-NR)

NR
(2.9-NR)

Median OS,
months (95% CI)

16.1
(14-NR)

NR
(9.4-NR)

0.77
NR
(NR-NR)

NR
(NR-NR)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; CrCl, creatinine clearance; HR, hazard ratio; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response.
aAssessed as per IMWG criteria.
bOn multivariable analysis, the presence of Renal Impairment was not independently associated with PFS (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.85-1.6; P=0.31).

Safety

  • Safety outcomes and AE management are detailed in Table: Summary and Management of AEs.
  • No delayed neurotoxicity or immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome was seen in patients with renal impairment.
  • In patients with severe renal impairment, any-grade CRS and any-grade ICANS were reported in 60% and 18% of patients, respectively; grade ≥3 CRS and ICANS were reported in 2% and 4% of patients, respectively.
  • Details on patients on dialysis are presented in Table: Safety Outcomes for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis.
  • At data cutoff, 137 patients who received TECVAYLI had died. See Table: Cause of Death for additional details.
  • Outcomes for patients with renal impairment by day 30 were as follows:
    • Among the 18 dialysis patients, 2 patients progressed, 2 patients died from myeloma progression and 14 patients remained alive and on dialysis.
    • Among the remaining 63 patients, 14 patients (22%) had progressed or died, 23 patients (37%) had an improvement in their CrCl (10 patients [16%] improved to CrCl ≥40 mL/min; 13 patients [21%] improved to CrCl 30-39 mL/min) and 25 patients (40%) had worsening of their CrCl. CrCl was unavailable for 1 patient.
  • Among patients without renal impairment at baseline, 73 patients (24%) progressed or died by day 30, 215 patients (71%) remained in the same range of CrCl ≥40 mL/min and 8 patients (2.6%) had worsening of their CrCl to <40 mL/min by day 30. CrCl was unavailable for 7 patients (2.3%).

Summary and Management of AEs9
AEa
Renal Impairment Group
(n=81)

No Renal Impairment Group
(n=303)

P Value
CRS, n (%)
   Any-grade CRS
41 (51)
178 (59)
0.23
   Grade ≥3 CRS
1 (1.2)
3 (1.0)
0.9
   CRS management
      Tocilizumab
32 (39.5)
114 (38)
0.85
      Steroids
10 (12)
54 (18)
0.31
      Anakinra
0
3 (0.9)
0.85
ICANS, n (%)
   Any-grade ICANS
13 (16)
41 (13)
0.6
   Grade ≥3 ICANS
2 (2.5)
8 (2.6)
0.9
   ICANS management
      Tocilizumab
2 (2.5)
9 (3)
1
      Steroids
7 (9)
28 (9)
1
      Anakinra
1 (1.2)
2 (0.6)
0.85
Length of hospital stay, days, median (IQR)b
8 (6-9)
8 (6-9)
0.75
Infections, n (%)
27 (33)
139 (46)
0.06
   Bacterial
15 (18.5)
61 (20)
-
   Viral
12 (15)
74 (24)
-
   Fungal
1 (1)
9 (3)
-
   Severe infections
16 (20)
58 (19)
0.9
Hematologic toxicities on day 30, n (%)
   Any-grade neutropeniac
15 (20)
72 (25)
0.5
      Grade ≥3 neutropeniac
1 (1.4)
23 (8)
0.07
   Any-grade anemiad
44 (59)
127 (44)
0.053
      Grade ≥3 anemiad
8 (11)
16 (6)
0.12
   Any-grade thrombocytopeniad
37 (49)
109 (38)
0.2
      Grade ≥3 thrombocytopeniad
13 (17)
18 (6)
0.002
Supportive care, n (%)
   GCSF use
10 (12)
53 (17)
0.3
   TPO use
2 (2.5)
8 (2.6)
>0.9
   IVIG use
29 (36)
109 (36)
>0.9
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; ASTCT, American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; GCSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; IQR, interquartile range; IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; TPO, thrombopoietin receptor agonist.
aCRS and ICANS were graded per ASTCT criteria; hematologic toxicities were graded per CTCAE v5; infectious prophylaxis, use of growth colony-stimulating factor, and management of CRS and ICANS were per institutional guidelines. Infection management guidelines were overall consistent with previously published guidelines.
bEvaluated in 323 patients.
cEvaluated in 74 patients in the Renal Impairment group and in 284 patients in the no Renal Impairment group.
dEvaulated in 75 patients in the Renal Impairment group and in 286 patients in the no Renal Impairment group.


Safety Outcomes for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis9,10
AE
Dialysis
(n=18)

Any-grade CRS, n (%)
10 (56)
   Grade ≥3 CRS
0
Any-grade ICANS, n (%)
3 (17)
   Grade ≥3 ICANS
1 (6)
Hematologic AEs, n (%)
   Grade ≥3 neutropeniaa
0
   Grade ≥3 anemiab
2 (13)
   Grade ≥3 thrombocytopeniab
3 (19)
Infections, n
   Total number of patients on dialysis with any-grade infection
5
   Total number of patients on dialysis with severe infection
4
   Number of total infections (any-grade)
8
   Number of severe infections
5
   Bacterial infections (any-grade)
6
      Lower respiratory tract
3
      Genitourinary tract
1
      Bloodstream
2
      Severe
4
   Viral infections (any-grade)
2
      Upper respiratory tract
1
      Lower respiratory tract
1
      Severe
1
   Fungal infections (any-grade)
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.
aEvaluated in 15 patients.
bEvaluated in 16 patients.


Cause of Death9,10
Death
Patients Without Renal Impairment
(n=303)

Patients With Renal Impairment
(CrCl <40 mL/min)
(n=81)

Patients With Renal Impairment but Not Severe
(CrCl 30-39 mL/min)
(n=36)

Patients With Severe Renal Impairment
(CrCl <30 mL/min)
(n=45)

Patients on Dialysis
(n=18)

Total deaths, n (%)
108 (36)
29 (36)
15 (41)
14 (31)
5 (28)
Myeloma-related, n (%)
82 (27)
19 (24)
12 (33)
7 (15)
4 (22)
Nonrelapse mortality, n (%)
26 (9)
10 (12)
3 (8)
7 (15)
1 (6)
TECVAYLI-related toxicity,
   n (%)

13 (4.3)
4 (5)
3 (8)
1 (2)
0
      Infection, n (%)
12 (-)
4 (-)
3 (8)
1 (2)
0
      ICANS, n
1
0
0
0
0
   Other neoplasm, n (%)
2 (0.7)
4 (5)
0
4 (9)
1 (6)
   Unrelated causes, n (%)
11 (4)
2 (2)
0
2 (2)
0
Abbreviations: CrCl, creatinine clearance; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

Lebreton et al (2024)11 published a retrospective analysis describing the safety and efficacy of TECVAYLI in 15 patients with RRMM on dialysis treated in France through an early access program.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients with RRMM and end-stage renal failure treated with TECVAYLI were included in the study, which was submitted to the French Health Data Hub.
  • TECVAYLI was administered SC QW at a dose of 1.5 mg/kg, following SUDs of 0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg.
  • Premedication (including dexamethasone) was administered prior to TECVAYLI per European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved prescribing information.
  • TECVAYLI was usually injected after dialysis, but schedules varied based on the dialysis schedule of each patient.

Results

Patient Demographics

  • Data was collected from 15 patients treated with TECVAYLI in French hospitals between November 2022 and October 2023. All patients were ineligible for open clinical trials.
  • The median follow-up was 166 days (range, 10-315), the median age of 68 years (range, 58-83), and the median time since diagnosis of 6 years (range, 2-9). Patients received a median of 4 prior lines of therapy (range, 3-6).
  • Most patients had myeloma-related end-stage renal failure.
  • Seven of 10 evaluable patients were considered as high-risk based on cytogenetics.

Dosing and Time to Dialysis

  • TECVAYLI SUD 2 was administered after a median of 3 days (range, 2-7) and the first treatment dose was administered after a median of 7 days (range, 4-14).
  • TECVAYLI was administered just after dialysis in 9 patients and on non-dialysis days in 3 patients.
  • All patients received HD, except for 1 patient who received peritoneal dialysis.
  • Dialysis was discontinued in 1 patient due to improved renal function.
  • TECVAYLI dosing was reduced to once every 2 weeks (Q2W) for 5 patients, once every 3 weeks for 1 patient and once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 1 patient.

Safety

CRS and ICANS
  • CRS of grade 1/2 occurring in 11 patients (all during the step-up dosing schedule) was treated with tocilizumab (4 patients) and dexamethasone (1 patient). Grade 3/4 CRS was not reported.
  • Grade 2 ICANS occurred concurrently with grade 2 CRS in 1 patient, both of which were resolved following treatment with 2 doses of dexamethasone.
Infections
  • Grade ≥2 infections were reported in 9 patients (grade 2, n=2; grade 3, n=4; grade 4, n=1; grade 5, n=2); bacteremia was reported in 7 patients (2 of which were fatal) and viral infection was reported in 2 patients.
  • Prophylaxis for infections included sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim and valaciclovir in 12 patients and oracillin in 6 patients.
  • Primary prophylaxis with SC or intravenous (IV) polyvalent immunoglobulin G (IgG) was administered to 8 patients.
  • Grade 3 coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was reported in 1 patient.

Efficacy

  • Median time to best response was 40 days (range, 6-124).
  • A total of 14 patients achieved a response. Of these, 2 patients experienced stringent complete response (sCR), 2 patients experienced complete response (CR), 7 patients had VGPR and 2 patients had PR.
  • One patient with progressive disease had extramedullary disease and died from sepsis.
  • One patient was not evaluable for response.
  • Median PFS was not reached.

CASE SERIES and case reports

Roila et al (2024)16 reported a retrospective case series of patients with RRMM on chronic hemodialysis treated with TECVAYLI.

Study Design/Methods

  • A retrospective review was conducted of patients with RRMM and severe renal failure on dialysis who were treated with TECVAYLI at Indiana university hospital from late 2022 to May 2024.
  • Patients were admitted for step‑up dosing, administered per FDA approval guidelines: 0.06 mg/kg (1st step‑up dose), 0.3 mg/kg (2nd step‑up dose), and 1.5 mg/kg (3rd dose).

Results

Baseline Characteristics

  • This study included 4 patients with RRMM.
  • Median age at TECVAYLI initiation was 76 years (range, 73-80).
  • Three of the four patients were male.
  • All patients had baseline FLC disease, of whom 3 patients had lambda FLC disease.
  • Two patients were positive for t(11;14) on cytogenetic testing.
  • All patients had received ≥3 prior therapies, including immunomodulatory drugs, proteasome inhibitors, and an anti‑CD38 monoclonal antibody.

Efficacy

  • Following initial TECVAYLI therapy:
    • Three patients achieved ≥VGPR.
    • One patient achieved a PR.
  • Median time to response was 6.5 weeks (range, 4-7), based on serum FLC reduction.

Safety

CRS and ICANS
  • CRS was reported in 2 patients.
    • One patient experienced grade 1 CRS, managed with tocilizumab and dexamethasone.
    • One patient had possible grade 3 CRS, treated with corticosteroids, oxygen therapy, and fluid resuscitation.
  • No cases of ICANS were reported.
Infection
  • One patient developed urinary tract infection (UTI) sepsis caused by Enterococcus faecalis after 2 months of continuous TECVAYLI treatment.
  • Patient was treated with broad‑spectrum antibiotics, IV fluids, and vasopressors, but died of multiple organ failure due to sepsis.
Follow-up
  • Patients had been followed for 2-14 years from diagnosis, with similar duration on dialysis, as all presented with myeloma‑related renal failure.
  • At last follow‑up, 2 patients were alive and 2 had died.
  • The 2 surviving patients remained on active TECVAYLI therapy, administered once weekly.  
  • All patients received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

Mohan et al (2025)14 reported a case of a 68-year old male who developed acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) after starting TECVAYLI for RRMM. The patient was stable on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) for 3 years.

Khouderchah et al (2024)12 published a case series that described the clinical course and outcomes in 4 patients with RRMM who were treated with TECVAYLI. These 4 patients had end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and were on HD at the time of TECVAYLI initiation.

Patient 1

  • A 65-year-old female diagnosed with kappa FLC MM with high-risk cytogenetics developed progressive myeloma-related renal impairment and was started on HD. After treatment with 11 prior lines of therapy (LOTs), the patient was started on TECVAYLI.
  • The patient was hospitalized and received 2 SUDs of SC TECVAYLI on days 1 and 4 (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively), followed by the first full dose on day 7 (1.5 mg/kg).
  • HD was continued irrespective of TECVAYLI administration. The patient had an incomplete HD run on day 1, and then underwent 3-hour HD runs on days 2, 5, and 7, including a HD session just prior to TECVAYLI administration on day 7. An additional HD session occurred on day 9.
  • The patient had no evidence of CRS and ICANS; she was discharged 48 hours after the first full dose of TECVAYLI.
  • The patient was continued on QW TECVAYLI. Prior to the start of cycle 3, she exhibited progressive disease (per IMWG response criteria) and enlargement of a known plasmacytoma on the forehead (as seen on imaging). TECVAYLI was discontinued.

Patient 2

  • A 68-year-old male diagnosed with IgA kappa light chain MM with high-risk cytogenetics had ESRD from MM requiring chronic HD and chronic anemia requiring QW red blood cell (RBC) transfusions. After treatment with 6 prior LOT, the patient was started on TECVAYLI.
  • The patient was hospitalized and received 2 SUDs of SC TECVAYLI on days 1 and 3 (0.06 mg/kg and 0.3 mg/kg, respectively), followed by the first full dose on day 5 (1.5 mg/kg SC). He received HD and 2 units of packed RBCs prior to SUD 1 with subsequent HD on days 7, 11, 13, and 15. Ultrafiltration was only performed on days 8 and 9.
  • The patient had no clinical evidence of CRS or ICANS.
  • The patient had orthopnea and shortness of breath with exertion before initiating TECVAYLI therapy. On day 6, he developed worsening orthopnea and was found to have newly diagnosed dilated cardiomyopathy, with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 28 (previously 69 in 2017) and pulmonary hypertension.
  • Over the course of several days, he received ongoing transfusion support for low hemoglobin. Based on fluid status and blood pressure, HD was modified. Symptoms of cardiomyopathy and pulmonary hypertension were thought to be unrelated to TECVAYLI. He was administered the second full-treatment dose of TECVAYLI on day 13.
  • Continuous renal replacement therapy was initiated in the intensive care unit due to cardiac issues prohibiting HD.
  • After receiving 2 weeks of full-treatment dose TECVAYLI, the patient achieved PR (per IMWG response criteria), despite his declining clinical status. No further TECVAYLI was given. The patient transitioned to comfort care and passed away shortly after.

Patient 3

  • A 65-year-old male diagnosed with IgG lambda MM with high-risk cytogenetics had a history of atrial fibrillation and ESRD which required HD at the time of MM diagnosis. After treatment with 8 prior LOT, the patient was started on TECVAYLI.
  • The patient was hospitalized and received SC TECVAYLI SUD 1 (0.06 mg/kg SC) and SUD 2 (0.3 mg/kg SC) administered on days 1 and 3, respectively; HD was completed the day after each dose.
  • The first full-treatment dose (1.5 mg/kg SC) was completed on day 5; followed by HD the next day. No clinical CRS or ICANS occurred.
  • Throughout hospitalization, the patient underwent approximately 3-hour HD sessions 3 times per week. An additional HD session was given due to contrast administration.
  • The patient had a prolonged hospitalization due to atrial fibrillation, new malignant pleural effusion and the development of dysphagia which was likely due to cranial nerve involvement from plasmacytoma.
  • On day 12, the patient became acutely confused, and the immune effector cell-associated encephalopathy (ICE) score decreased to 5; a neurology consult deemed this to be related to metabolic abnormalities, and TECVAYLI doses were withheld.
  • Despite interventions to correct the metabolic abnormalities, the patient’s neurologic status still declined. On day 14, the ICE score decreased to 1, and dexamethasone 10 mg IV every 6 hours was started for potential grade 3 ICANS.
  • An increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) was noted (baseline of 1.33 mg/dL increased to 3.78 mg/dL).
  • Dexamethasone was increased to every 4 hours; anakinra 100 mg SC was administered for refractory ICANS after the patient’s neurologic status did not improve.
  • The family chose to withdraw care and the patient was discharged to hospice after imaging showed persistent disease and minimal improvement in mental status was observed.

Patient 4

  • A 61-year-old female diagnosed with standard-risk IgG kappa MM developed renal failure secondary to disease and was started on HD. After treatment with 7 prior LOT, the patient was started on TECVAYLI.
  • The patient was hospitalized and received SC TECVAYLI SUD 1 (0.06 mg/kg SC) and SUD 2 (0.3 mg/kg SC) administered on days 1 and 3, respectively, with HD performed prior to each dose.
  • On day 4, the patient developed grade 1 CRS with a fever of 38°C. On day 6, ferritin levels increased to a peak of 836 ng/mL (from 745 ng/mL at baseline). CRP levels increased to a peak of 11.03 mg/dL (from 0.33 mg/dL at baseline).
  • The patient was treated with acetaminophen for fever and was started on broad-spectrum antibiotics. By day 5, the fever resolved and infectious work-up was negative.
  • The patient received the first full-treatment dose of SC TECVAYLI (1.5 mg/kg) after HD.
  • No additional CRS or ICANS events occurred, and the patient was discharged for outpatient follow-up on day 7.
  • The patient had a significant decrease in the kappa FLC (161.98 mg/dL at baseline to 2.63 mg/dL) prior to the second full-treatment dose. She was continued on QW TECVAYLI; prior to the third full-treatment dose, the patient achieved sCR (per IMWG response criteria).
  • The patient completed cycle 2 before being transitioned to dosing of Q2W per provider preference. She completed 3 cycles of TECVAYLI and was lost to follow-up.

Joiner et al (2023)13 published a case series which reported initial observations in 7 patients with MM and severely impaired renal function treated with TECVAYLI. This series included 4 patients with ESRD on HD therapy at the time of TECVAYLI initiation.The other 3 patients had an eGFR of 16 mL/min, 22 mL/min, and 27 mL/min, respectively.

  • Risk factors of the 7 patients included: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 2-3, cytogenetic abnormalities, extramedullary plasmacytoma, and triple-class and penta-class refractory status.The median follow-up of these observations was 2 months (range, 1-7).
  • The FDA approved TECVAYLI prescribing information dosing schedule was followed for dosing cycles 1 and 2. At dosing cycle 3 the frequency was modified to Q2W for 8 doses followed by Q4W starting cycle 7 onward.
    • Infection prophylaxis (starting at onset of TECVAYLI) and monthly IVIG (starting on the second month) was administered.
  • A total of 6 patients experienced CRS (maximum CRS grade 1, n=4; grade 2, n=1; grade 3, n=1). No events of ICANS or infections have been reported at this time.
  • Renal improvement was noted in 1 patient with acute renal impairment related to myeloma progression (eGFR from 27 mL/min to 56 mL/min after cycle 1).Stable renal function was maintained in 1 patient.Worsening renal function along with disease progression was observed in 1 patient.
  • A total of 5 patients experienced evidence of VGPR and remain on TECVAYLI treatment to date.Two patients with extramedullary plasmacytoma experienced disease progression and discontinued TECVAYLI treatment prior to cycle 2.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 06 April 2026.

 

References

1 Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495-505.  
2 Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Protocol to: Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495-505.  
3 Hameed M, Habib A, Khan AM, et al. A real-world analysis of the safety and efficacy of teclistamab for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and baseline renal impairment—USMIRC group. Cancers. 2026;18(5):740.  
4 Hameed M, Habib A, Khan AM, et al. Supplement to: A real-world analysis of the safety and efficacy of teclistamab for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and baseline renal impairment—USMIRC group. Cancers (Basel). 2026;18(5):740.  
5 Tokarski R, Catanzaro J, Mensah R, et al. Teclistamab and talquetamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients with severe renal insufficiency: a case series. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2026;32:S443. Abstract 612.  
6 Parekh D, Faiman B, Mazzoni S, et al. Propensity matched study of outcomes of teclistamab in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma with severe renal failure. Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. 2026;32:S426-S427. Abstract 585.  
7 Charkviani M, Brochero MJV, Mohan A, et al. Incidence of acute kidney injury in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with teclistamab versus CAR-T cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025;gfaf004.  
8 Charkviani M, Brochero MJV, Mohan A, et al. Supplement to: Incidence of acute kidney injury in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma treated with teclistamab versus CAR-T cells. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2025;gfaf004.  
9 Dima D, Afrough A, Goel U, et al. Teclistamab for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment. [published online ahead of print April 08, 2025]. Blood Adv. 2025. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016059.  
10 Dima D, Afrough A, Goel U, et al. Supplement to: Teclistamab for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and renal impairment. [published online ahead of print April 08, 2025]. Blood Adv. 2025. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2025016059.  
11 Lebreton P, Lachenal F, Bouillie S, et al. Teclistamab for relapsed refractory multiple myeloma patients on dialysis. Br J Haematol. 2024;205(5):2077-2079.  
12 Khouderchah CJ, Ochs M, Pianko M, et al. Administration of teclistamab in four patients with multiple myeloma requiring hemodialysis. J Oncol Pharm Pr. 2024;30(6):1089-1095.  
13 Joiner L, Bal S, Godby KN, et al. Teclistamab in patients with multiple myeloma and impaired renal function. Am J Hematol. 2023;98(11):E322-E324.  
14 Mohan A, Barbir EB, Hernandez LH, et al. Synergistic effect of teclistamab with PD-1 inhibition: a case of acute interstitial nephritis with dual immunotherapy. Clin Kidney J. 2024;18(2):sfae425.  
15 Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Katsadouros I, Malandrakis P, et al. Dialysis independence for a young patient with refractory multiple myeloma treated with teclistamab: A case report. Oncol Lett. 2025;30(4):474.  
16 Roila N, Suvannasankha A, Abonour R. Safety and efficacy of teclistamab in a patient series with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment on dialysis. Blood. 2024;144(Supplement 1):6912-6912.  
17 TECVAYLI (teclistamab-cqyv) [Prescribing Information]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc; https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/TECVAYLI-pi.pdf