J&J Medical Connect
TECVAYLI®

(teclistamab-cqyv)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

TECVAYLI - Use in Plasma Cell Leukemia

Last Updated: 07/27/2026

SUMMARY

  • TECVAYLI is not approved by the regulatory agencies for the treatment of patients with plasma cell leukemia (PCL).
  • Johnson & Johnson does not recommend the use of TECVAYLI in a manner inconsistent with the approved labeling.
  • Gaballa et al (2026)2 published a multicenter, retrospective study evaluating the efficacy and safety of bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), including TALVEY and TECVAYLI, in 122 patients with PCL from 15 United States (US) academic centers.
  • Shrestha et al (2025)3 published a retrospective study of 16 patients with secondary PCL (sPCL) treated with ≥1 full dose of TECVAYLI at 3 US academic centers.
  • Mohan et al (2024)4 published a retrospective, real-world study of 110 patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treated with TECVAYLI at 5 US academic centers.
  • Grajales-Cruz et al (2023)5 presented a single-center, retrospective chart review of 22 patients with prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) targeted therapy treated with TECVAYLI.
  • Bardenbacher et al (2024)6 reported a case of a 59-year-old female patient with PCL.

PRODUCT LABELING

CLINICAL DATA - Retrospective studies

Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium Study: Multicenter, Retrospective Study on Efficacy and Safety of BsAbs, Including TECVAYLI and TALVEY

Gaballa et al (2026)2 published a multicenter, retrospective Multiple Myeloma (MM) Immunotherapy Consortium study evaluating the efficacy and safety of BsAbs, including TECVAYLI and TALVEY, in patients with PCL.

Study Design/Methods

  • This study included patients with primary and secondary PCL from 15 US academic centers who were treated with BCMA- or G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-directed BsAbs, including TECVAYLI, elranatamab, or TALVEY.
    • Patients received TALVEY either as definitive line of therapy (TALVEY LOT) or as bridge to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T; TALVEY Bridge)
  • PCL was defined as ≥5% circulating plasma cells (CPCs) in the peripheral blood, and included primary PCL, secondary PCL, historical PCL, and active PCL.
    • Primary PCL was defined as disease arising de novo.
    • Secondary PCL was defined as disease evolving from pre-existing MM and CPCs ≥5% for the first time at BsAb initiation, in the setting of previously diagnosed MM without prior history of PCL.
    • Active PCL was defined as active disease within 30 days of BsAb initiation.
    • Historical PCL was defined as disease that developed at any time from initial diagnosis through the last LOT prior to BsAb.
  • Primary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression‑free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
  • Secondary endpoints included incidence and severity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and the incidence of infections during follow-up.

Results

Treatment Disposition, Baseline Demographics, and Disease Characteristics

  • A total of 122 patients with PCL who were treated with BsAbs from 15 US centers were included in this study (27% primary PCL, 73% secondary PCL, 49% active PCL, 48% historical PCL, and 3% prior PCL with unknown disease status at treatment initiation). See Table: Baseline Characteristics for additional details.

Baseline Characteristics2
Characteristic
Overall
(N=122)

TECVAYLI
(n=45)

Elranatamab
(n=13)

TALVEY LOT
(n=51)

TALVEY Bridge
(n=13)

P Value
Median age, years (range)
65 (31-83)
66 (31-83)
66 (39-73)
64 (46-83)
65 (40-75)
0.85
Men, %
48
56
46
43
38
0.57
Race, %
   White
77
76
85
76
77
0.68
   Black
15
18
0
16
15
   Others
8
6
15
8
8
PCL status at the time of BsAb initiation, n
   Active
49
49
69
51
23
0.13
   Historical
48
42
31
49
77
0.09
   Unknowna
3
9
0
0
0
-
PCL subtype, n
   Primary
27
24
15
33
23
0.54
   Secondary
73
76
85
67
77
0.54
Highrisk cytogenetics, %
   Del(17p)
34
23
54
40
25
0.13
   t(4:14)
20
16
31
15
42
0.12
   t(14:16)
11
9
23
10
8
0.55
   1q gain/amp
50
39
77
51
58
0.09
   Del(1p)
14
14
31
12
0
0.16
High bone marrow burdenb
45
38
64
53
20
0.13
Extramedullary disease, %
   Paraskeletal
7
7
8
8
8
0.97
   True
20
16
23
24
15
CNS involvement, %
5
2
15
6
0
0.21
Prior therapies
   Median prior LOTs, n
   (IQR)

6 (4-8)
5 (4-7)
5 (4-6)
6 (5-9)
4 (4-5)
-
   Triplerefractory, %
94
88
92
98
100
0.17
   Pentarefractory, %
57
53
54
68
25
0.05
   Prior transplant, %
73
73
62
80
54
0.2
   Prior BCMAdirected
   therapyc, %

57
42
38
82
23
<0.01
BsAb usage, n
   Monotherapy
94
100
92
90
92
0.21
   Combination with    
   other agents

6
0
8
10
8
Abbreviations: BCMA, Bcell maturation antigen; BsAb, bispecific antibody; CNS, central nervous system; IQR, interquartile range; LOT, line of therapy; PCL, plasma cell leukemia.
aFour patients had a known history of PCL but unknown disease status at the time of BsAb initiation.
bHigh bone marrow burden was defined as ≥50% involvement by malignant plasma cells.
cTALVEY group, 70%; BCMA-BsAb group, 41%.

Treatment Exposure

  • Patients were treated across 4 BsAb cohorts:
    • TECVAYLI: 37% (n=45)
    • TALVEY LOT: 42% (n=51)
    • TALVEY as a bridge to CAR-T: 11% (n=13)
    • Elranatamab: 11% (n=13)
  • BsAbs were administered as monotherapy in 94% of patients and in combination with other agents (including pomalidomide [4%], bortezomib [1%], and chemotherapy [1%]) in 6% of patients.
  • A majority of the patients receiving TALVEY were treated with the 0.8 mg/kg every-2-week regimen (96% in the TALVEY LOT cohort and 91% in the TALVEY bridge cohort), whereas only 4% and 9%, respectively, received the 0.4 mg/kg weekly schedule.

Efficacy

  • Among 110 overall evaluable patients, survival outcomes varied significantly by treatment cohort at a median follow-up of 8.3 months.
Active PCL Subgroup
  • Among 60 with active PCL at the time of BsAb initiation, survival differed significantly by therapy in favor of TALVEY LOT (P<0.001 for PFS and P=0.002 for OS).
    • Median PFS was 3.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0-7.9), and the median OS was 5.2 months (95% CI, 0-13).
    • Efficacy response in the evaluable patients with active PCL is shown in Table: Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Active PCL at the Time of BsAb Initiation.
    • Among patients with active PCL, PFS did not differ significantly with primary vs secondary PCL (8.8 months [95% CI, 0-18] vs 1.6 months [95% CI, 1-2.2]; P=0.15).
    • Among patients with active PCL, OS did not differ significantly with primary vs secondary PCL (12.2 months [95% CI, not calculable] vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 2.5-7.9]; P=0.054).
Historical PCL Subgroup
  • Among 58 patients with historical PCL, no significant differences in survival were observed between primary (n=25) and secondary PCL (n=33).
    • Median PFS was 2.1 months (95% CI, 0-4.9) vs 5.8 months (95% CI, 2-9.6) for primary vs secondary historical PCL (P=0.2).
    • Median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-15.2) vs 10.4 months (95% CI, 7.2-13.6) for primary vs secondary historical PCL (P=0.85).
    • Survival outcomes in the evaluable patients with historical PCL are shown in Table: Survival Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Historical PCL.
    • Among patients with historical vs active PCL, median PFS was 4.4 months (95% CI, 1.8-7) vs 1.6 months (95% CI, 0.4-2.8; P=0.036) and median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI, 5.8-15.6) vs 5.3 months (95% CI, 0-10.7; P=0.004).
Multivariable Analysis
  • Active PCL was associated with worse PFS (P=0.02; hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% CI, 1.1-4.02) and OS (P=0.02; HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.12-4.87).
  • TALVEY LOT was associated with improved PFS (P=0.01; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.21-0.79) and OS (P=0.01; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.19-0.82).
  • TALVEY bridge was associated with improved PFS (P=0.05; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.08-1.01) and OS (P=0.11; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.07-1.33) without reaching statistical significance for both PFS and OS.

Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in Overall Population2
Parameter
TALVEY LOT
(n=51)

TALVEY Bridge to CARTa
(n=13)

TECVAYLI
(n=45)

Elranatamab
(n=13)

BsAbs in Combination With Other Agentsb
(n=7)

ORR, %
61
58
33
46
71
   CR
22
17
20
39
-
   VGPR
24
8
4
-
43
   PR
16
33
9
8
29
Median PFS
(95% CI), months
5.5 (3.5-7.5)
NR
1.2 (0.7-1.7)
1.6c (0-4.3)
1.2 (0.3-2.1)e
Median OS
(95% CI), months

11.5 (7.2-15.8)
NR
8.1 (3.2-13)
3.6d (2.8-4.4)
3.4 (0-10.5)f
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; LOT, line of therapy; NR, not reached; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response.
aDay 30 pre-CAR-T response.
bIncludes pomalidomide, bortezomib, or chemotherapy.
c
P=0.007
dP=0.023
eP=0.003
fP=0.001


Efficacy Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Active PCL at the Time of BsAb Initiation2
Parameter
TALVEY LOT (n=26)
TALVEY Bridge to CARTa
(n=3)

TECVAYLI
(n=22)

Elranatamab
(n=9)

BsAbs
ORR, %
71
67
28
33
-
   CR
21
-
17
22
-
   VGPR
21
-
-
-
-
   PR
29
67
11
11
-
Median PFS,
months (95% CI)

6.9 (2.6-11.2)
3.2 (0-7.9)
0.7 (0.2-1.1)
1 (0-2.1)
0.7 (0.1-1.5)
Median OS,
months (95% CI)

12.2 (8.1-16.3)
5.2 (0-13)
1.4 (0.7-2.1)
3.1 (0-7.8)
1.4 (0.8-2)
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; LOT, line of therapy; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PCL, plasma cell leukemia; PFS, progression-free survival; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good partial response.
aDay 30 pre-CAR-T response. One patient died 9 days after initiation of BsAb therapy before receiving CAR T-cell therapy, whereas the other two patients subsequently received CAR T-cell infusion.


Survival Outcomes by Treatment Cohort in the Evaluable Patients With Historical PCLa,2
Parameter
TALVEY LOT (n=25)
TALVEY Bridgeb
(n=10)

TECVAYLI
(n=19)

Elranatamab
(n=4)

BsAbs
Median PFS, months (95% CI)
3.7 (1.9-5.4)
NR
2.3 (0.5-4.1)
NR
5.2 (1-9.3)
Median OS, months (95% CI)
10.4 (5.1-15.7)
NR
10.7 (6.2-15.2)
8.5
8.5 (7.7-9.3)
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy; CI, confidence interval; LOT, line of therapy; NR, not reached; OS, overall survival; PCL, plasma cell leukemia; PFS, progression-free survival.
aDefined asabsence of active PCL within 30 days of BsAb initiation (n=58).
bDay 30 pre-CAR-T response.

Safety

  • The median hospitalization duration was 10 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8-15).
  • CRS was reported as grade 1 in 41%, grade 2 in 14.8%, grade 3 in 2.5%, and grade 4 in 1.6% of patients.
  • ICANS was reported as grade 1 in 8.2%, grade 2 in 7.4%, grade 3 in 3.3%, and grade 4 in 1.6% of patients.
    • Of the patients who experienced grade 3-4 ICANS (4.9%, n=6), 3 received TECVAYLI, 2 received TALVEY, and 1 received elranatamab.
  • CRS and ICANS events per PCL status are summarized in Table: CRS and ICANS According to PCL Status at BsAb Initiation.
  • Infections were reported in 34% of patients, including grade 1-2 in 20% and grade ≥3 in 14% of patients.
    • Among patients with infections, viral infections were reported in 40% (n=219), bacterial infections in 36%, fungal infections in 10%, and mixed-pathogen infections in 14% of patients.
    • Infection-related deaths were reported in 4% of patients (n=5) receiving BsAbs and included pneumonia, sepsis, and bacteremia.
  • No deaths were attributed to CRS or ICANS.

CRS and ICANS According to PCL Status at BsAb Initiation2
Event, n (%)
Active PCL
(n=60)

Historical PCL
(n=58)

P Valuea
CRS
   Grade 1-2
29 (48.3)
36 (62.1)
0.15
   Grade 3-4
4 (6.7)
1 (1.7)
0.36
ICANS
   Grade 1-2
11 (18.3)
8 (13.8)
0.62
   Grade 3-4
3 (5)
3 (5.2)
1
Abbreviations: BsAb, bispecific antibody; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; PCL, plasma cell leukemia.
aP values were calculated using Fisher's exact test.

Multicenter Retrospective Study on Treatment of sPCL With TECVAYLI

Shrestha et al (2025)3 published a retrospective study of 16 patients with sPCL treated with ≥1 full dose of TECVAYLI at 3 US academic centers.

Results

Baseline Characteristics

  • The median CPCs level was 7.45% (range, 5%-82%).
  • All enrolled patients exhibited high‑risk cytogenetic profiles, including multiple chromosomal translocations t(4;14), t(14;16), del(17p), gain(1q21), del(1p).
  • Patients received a median of 4.5 prior LOTs (range, 2-10), and 87% had previously undergone autologous stem cell transplantation.
  • A total of 25% of patients (n=4) had been exposed to BCMA‑directed therapies before receiving TECVAYLI.

Efficacy

  • The ORR was 31% (5/16), including 1 patient with a complete response and 4 patients with a partial response.
  • No response to TECVAYLI was observed in patients who had previously received BCMA‑directed therapy.
  • The median PFS for responders was 4.6 months (95% CI, 0.6-not evaluable [NE]).
  • At a median follow‑up duration of 61 days (95% CI, 12-543), all patients had experienced either disease progression or death by the time of the last assessment.
  • At a median follow-up of 14 months, median OS was not reached in patients who achieved a response. The median OS among nonresponders was 1.13 months (95% CI, 0.43-NE).
  • Assessment of absolute lymphocyte count as a predictor of response in sPCL showed no significant difference between responders (median, 0.5×10³/µL; range, 0.2×10³/µL to 1.3×10³/µL) and nonresponders (median, 0.7×10³/µL; range, 0.2×10³/µL to 6.5×10³/µL), with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.32 (95% CI, 0.02-3.87; P=0.37).
  • CPC levels were not significantly correlated with treatment response (OR, 1.006; 95% CI, 0.95-1.05; P=0.79) or PFS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96-1.01; P=0.38).

Safety

  • Grade 1/2 CRS was observed in 56% of patients, and 55% of these patients received tocilizumab. No grade 3/4 CRS was observed.
  • ICANS was reported in 2 patients (grade 2, n=1; grade 3, n=1).

Multicenter Retrospective Real-World Study on Treatment With TECVAYLI

Mohan et al (2024)4 published a retrospective, real-world study of 110 patients with RRMM treated with TECVAYLI at 5 US academic centers. Two patients included in this study had sPCL. Both patients experienced fulminant disease relapse after the first full dose of TECVAYLI.

Single-Center Retrospective Chart Review

Grajales-Cruz et al (2023)5 presented a single-center, retrospective chart review of 22 patients with prior BCMA targeted therapy treated with TECVAYLI; 5% of patients had PCL for which efficacy and safety outcomes were not disclosed.

CLINICAL DATA - case report

Bardenbacher et al (2024)6 reported a case of a 59-year-old female patient with PCL who was refractory to several LOTs before achieving a complete remission to TECVAYLI, daratumumab and lenalidomide and consolidating allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (allo-HSCT) transplantation. Prior to allo-HSCT transplantation, TECVAYLI was administered for 10 weeks and 8 weeks in combination with daratumumab and lenalidomide due to a slow clinical response. A 4-month complete remission was reported.

literature search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 20 July 2026.

 

References

1 Moreau P, Garfall AL, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2022;387(6):495-505.  
2 Gaballa MR, Julian K, Afrough A, et al. Real-world outcomes with BCMA-and GPRC5D-targeting bispecific antibodies in plasma cell leukemia. [published online ahead of print July 02, 2026]. Blood Advances. 2026. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2026020826.  
3 Shrestha A, Thanendrarajan S, Bag A, et al. The efficacy of teclistamab in patients with multiple myeloma and secondary plasma cell leukemia. Blood Advances. 2025;9(19):4806-4809.  
4 Mohan M, Monge J, Shah N, et al. Teclistamab in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma: multi-institutional real-world study. Blood Cancer J. 2024;14(1):35.  
5 Grajales-Cruz AF, Castaneda O, Hansen DK, et al. Teclistamab induces favorable responses in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma after prior BCMA-directed therapy. Blood. 2023;142(Supplement 1):3351.  
6 Bardenbacher M, Hefter C, 1 SI, et al. Complete remission in a case of refractory primary plasma cell leukemia after treatment with teclistamab, daratumumab and lenalidomide and consolidating allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a clinical report. Abstract presented at: Jahrestagung der Deutschen, Osterreichischen und Schweizerischen Gesellschaften furHamatologie und Medizinische Onkologie; October 11-14, 2024; Basel, Switzerland.  

Would you like to clear and leave your conversation? Message history will be lost.