(esketamine)
This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
Last Updated: 04/03/2026
The Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality- Revised Version (CGI-SS-R) summarizes the clinician’s overall impression of severity of suicidality on a 7-point scale from 0 (normal, not at all suicidal) to 6 (among the most extremely suicidal patients. Scores were based on answers to the following question: “Considering your total clinical experience with suicidal patients and all information now available to you, how suicidal is this patient at this time?” The majority of patients were rated as moderately to severely suicidal at baseline.3,4
| ASPIRE-I3 | ASPIRE-II4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGI-SS-R Category, n (%)a | SPRAVATO 84 mgb | SOC + PBO (n=112) | SPRAVATO 84 mg + SOC (n=114) | SOC + PBO (n=113) |
| Questionably suicidal | 5 (4.5%) | 3 (2.7%) | 1 (0.9%) | 3 (2.7%) |
| Mildly suicidal | 6 (5.4%) | 11 (9.8%) | 10 (8.8%) | 6 (5.3%) |
| Moderately suicidal | 29 (26.1%) | 28 (25.0%) | 35 (30.7%) | 33 (29.2%) |
| Markedly suicidal | 38 (34.2%) | 42 (37.5%) | 48 (42.1%) | 42 (37.2%) |
| Severely suicidal | 29 (26.1%) | 27 (24.1%) | 17 (14.9%) | 28 (24.8%) |
| Extremely suicidal | 4 (3.6%) | 1 (0.9%) | 3 (2.6%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Prior Suicide Attempt, n (%)a | 66 (59.5%) | 68 (60.7%) | 78 (68.4%) | 72 (63.7%) |
| Suicide Attempt within Last Month, n (%) | 32 (28.6%) | 31 (27.7%) | 36 (31.6%) | 24 (21.2%) |
| Abbreviations: CGI-SS-R, Clinical Global Impression of Severity of Suicidality – Revised; PBO, placebo; SOC, standard of care. an=111 in SPRAVATO+SOC arm due to missing baseline value for a patient. bA single dose reduction to SPRAVATO 56 mg was permitted for intolerance and continued throughout the remainder of the study . c | ||||
The incidence of TEAEs potentially related to suicidality in completed phase 3 studies in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and active suicidal ideation with intent is summarized in Table: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Potentially Related to Suicidality in ASPIRE-I and ASPIRE-II.
| SPRAVATO 84 mga + SOCb n (%) | SOC + PBO n (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| ASPIRE-I | ||
| DB Treatment Phase | n=113 | n=112 |
| Patients with ≥1 TEAE | 7 (6.2%) | 7 (6.3%) |
| Depression suicidal | 2 (1.8%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Intentional self-injury | 2 (1.8%) | 2 (1.8%) |
| Suicidal ideation | 2 (1.8%) | 3 (2.7%) |
| Suicide attempt | 1 (0.9%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Intentional overdose | 1 (0.9%) | 0 |
| Follow-Up Phasec | n=101 | n=91 |
| Patients with ≥1 TEAE | 12 (11.9%) | 10 (11.0%) |
| Depression suicidal | 5 (5.0%) | 3 (3.3%) |
| Suicidal ideation | 5 (5.0%) | 5 (5.5%) |
| Suicide attempt | 3 (3.0%) | 2 (2.2%) |
| Death by suicide | 1 (1.0%) | 0 |
| Intentional self-injury | 0 | 2 (2.2%) |
| ASPIRE-II | ||
| DB Treatment Phase | n=114 | n=113 |
| Patients with ≥1 TEAE | 10 (8.8%) | 10 (8.8%) |
| Intentional self-injury | 5 (4.4%) | 1 (0.9%) |
| Suicidal ideation | 5 (4.4%) | 6 (5.3%) |
| Suicidal attempt | 3 (2.6%) | 3 (2.7%) |
| Depression suicidal | 0 | 1 (0.9%) |
| Follow-Up Phasec | n=89 | n=94 |
| Patients with ≥1 TEAE | 9 (10.1%) | 9 (9.6%) |
| Suicidal ideation | 5 (5.6%) | 7 (7.4%) |
| Suicide attempt | 4 (4.5%) | 1 (1.1%) |
| Intentional self-injury | 3 (3.4%) | 0 |
| Depression suicidal | 0 | 2 (2.1%) |
| Abbreviations: DB, double-blind; PBO, placebo; SOC, standard of care. aA single dose reduction to SPRAVATO 56 mg was permitted for intolerance and continued throughout the remainder of the study. bSOC consisted of initial psychiatric hospitalization and newly initiated or optimized oral antidepressant(s) therapy. cDuring the follow-up phase, patients were treated with only SOC. To report the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in the follow-up phase, the patients were grouped according to the DB treatment regimen. Note: Incidence is based on the number of subjects experiencing at least 1 adverse event, not the number of events. | ||
Of the 452 patients in the clinical program, 1 death due to suicide was reported in a patient previously treated with SPRAVATO during the follow-up phase of the ASPIRE-1 trial.3 See table: Serious Adverse Event of Death by Suicide in ASPIRE-I.
| Age (years); Gender | Narrative | Investigator’s Assessment of Relationship to SPRAVATO |
|---|---|---|
| 53; female | Died due to suicide during the follow-up phase. The last dose of SPRAVATO 84 mg was received 3 days prior to the event. The investigator considered MDD, TRD with chronic passive and active suicidal ideation, and a history of 5 suicide attempts as the risk factors.1,3 | Not related |
| Abbreviations: MDD, major depressive disorder; TRD, treatment-resistant disorder. | ||
Ammendolia et al (2025)9 conducted an analysis of the EudraVigilance database, which includes reports from countries in the European Economic Area and the United Kingdom, identified 751 ICSRs of SPRAVATOrelated adverse reactions from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2024. Of the total reported cases, 265 (35.3%) were classified as serious, with 27 of these cases attributed to death. Among the serious cases, there were 17 completed suicides (6.4%), 26 cases of suicidal ideation (9.8%), and 14 cases of suicide attempt (5.3%). Additional analyses were performed to examine differences in suicide-related outcomes by sex, age, and other antidepressant use. Comparisons between males and females showed a higher incidence of suicidal ideation in females (65.4% [n=17] vs 34.6% [n=9]; P=not significant (NS)) and suicide attempt (78.6% [n=11] vs 21.4% [n=3]; P=NS), whereas completed suicide was more common among males (70.6% [n=12] vs 29.4% [n=5]; P=0.005). Although suicidal AEs occurred more frequently in patients aged 18-64 than in those 65-85, no significant differences were found. There were significant increased potential risks with SPRAVATO use compared to fluoxetine for suicidal ideation (ROR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.75-4.94) and completed suicide (ROR, 8.05; 95% CI, 3.55-18.3). Similar findings were observed in comparison between SPRAVATO and venlafaxine for suicidal ideation (ROR, 5.25; 95% CI, 3.15-8.73) and completed suicide (ROR, 10.58; 95% CI, 5.08–22.04).
Limitations of the EudraVigilance database include the absence of denominators, the possibility of missed or duplicate cases, variability in the quality of information provided, and the inability to infer causality. Patients who received SPRAVATO may have had more severe depression than those who received SSRIs, and suicidality may be a result of the disease.
An analysis was conducted using the FAERS to identify relevant safety signals for SPRAVATO.10 A case/non-case study design was utilized in which cases were defined by reports about SPRAVATO, while non-cases were represented by AEs recorded for all other drugs in FAERS over the first year of SPRAVATO approval. If the proportion of AEs of interest was greater in cases versus non-cases, then this was considered a disproportionality signal. AEs were classified into four categories, according to their predictability: expected AEs with a detected signal, expected AEs without a signal, disease-related AEs, or unexpected AEs.
There was a total of 2274 SPRAVATO-related AEs in 962 patients with 389 serious AEs. Suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and death by suicide were identified as disease-related adverse events (see Table: Suicide-related Adverse Events).
| Adverse Event | n | Reporting Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Bayesian Information Component (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suicidal ideation | 64 | 24.03 (18.72 to 30.84) | 4.31 (3.9 to 4.61) |
| Suicidal attempt | 6 | 3.75 (1.68 to 8.35) | 1.63 (0.21 to 2.54) |
| Death by suicide | 11 | 5.75 (3.18 to 10.41) | 2.25 (1.23 to 2.94) |
| Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval. | |||
The authors noted that the results must be interpreted with caution, partly due to the FAERS database having limitations, including the inability to infer causality, barriers to reporting, limitations in the quality of information received, and the inability to calculate an incidence rate due to a lack of a denominator.10 Furthermore, the FAERS does not include information on the patients’ baseline suicidality and illness severity (which are important risk factors for suicide-related AEs).14
Another analysis conducted using the FAERS database for 5061 SPRAVATO-related AEs from the first quarter of 2019 to the first quarter of 2023 reported the occurrence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempts (see Table: Suicide-related Adverse Events).11
| Adverse Event | n | Reporting Odds Ratio (95% CI) | Proportional Reporting Ratio (95% CI) | Bayesian Information Component (IC025) | Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM05) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suicidal ideation | 456 | 38.54 (35.06 to 42.37) | 37.00 (33.79 to 40.52) | 5.07 (4.93) | 36.25 (32.97) |
| Suicidal attempt | 140 | 15.67 (13.26 to 18.53) | 15.49 (13.13 to 18.27) | 3.80 (3.56) | 15.36 (12.99) |
| Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; EBGM, Empiric Bayes Geometric Mean; EBGM05, the lower limit of the 90% confidence interval for the Empiric Bayes Geometric Mean; IC, information component; IC025, the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval for the information component. | |||||
Limitations of the FAERS database are similar to the above Eudravigilance database.15
A literature search of MEDLINE®
| 1 | |
| 2 | |
| 3 | |
| 4 | |
| 5 | |
| 6 | |
| 7 | |
| 8 | |
| 9 | |
| 10 | |
| 11 | |
| 12 | |
| 13 | |
| 14 | |
| 15 |