This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Adverse Event of SPRAVATO - Sedation and Somnolence

Last Updated: 05/15/2025

SUMMARY

  • Before SPRAVATO administration, instruct patients not to engage in potentially hazardous activities, such as driving a motor vehicle or operating machinery until the next day after a restful sleep.1
  • Somnolence was 1 of the more common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) observed in phase 3 studies (see Table: TEAEs of Sedation/Somnolence and/or MOAA/S).2-8 Sedative effects were measured by the Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) scale. Based on the MOAA/S, onset of sedative symptoms was generally observed at approximately 15 minutes after the first dose was administered, peaking at 30-45 minutes postdose and resolving by 1 to 1.5 hours postdose.3,4,9,10
    • The most frequently reported level of sedation in both adult and elderly patients in the treatment-resistant depression (TRD) studies was mild sedation (corresponding to a MOAA/S score of 4).9
    • Dose-related increases in the incidence of sedation were observed in the fixed-dose TRD study.3
  • Post hoc analyses of 2 short-term and 2 long-term studies in TRD found that those who experienced somnolence or sedation during the first week of treatment with SPRAVATO+oral antidepressant (AD) were more likely to have somnolence or sedation recur during subsequent weeks.2,3,5,6,11,12
  • Real-world retrospective studies reported sedation rates between 14.6% and 31.7%.13-17
  • Postmarketing safety data:
    • From the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program from 5 March 2019 to 5 January 2024, sedation was reported in 61.9% of patients in 34.7% of treatment sessions.18 
    • An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS; from the first quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2023) identified 14,606 adverse events (AEs) reported for SPRAVATO, of which 688 cases were due to sedation.19
  • A postmarketing evaluation of Janssen’s Global Medical Safety Database (from March 2019 through January 2023) identified 25 cases in which patients were reported to have concurrent respiratory depression AEs and sedation and/or dissociation.20 In the majority of cases, patients were using concomitant medications or had comorbidities, including anxiety disorder, obesity, alcohol abuse, and hypothyroidism (although respiratory depression cannot be attributed to these factors).
  • Concomitant use with central nervous system (CNS) depressants (e.g., benzodiazepines, opioids, alcohol) may increase sedation; therefore, closely monitoring for sedation is recommended with concomitant use of SPRAVATO with CNS depressants.21

PRODUCT LABELING

  • Because of the risks of serious adverse outcomes resulting from sedation, dissociation, respiratory depression, abuse and misuse, SPRAVATO is only available through a restricted program under a REMS called the SPRAVATO REMS.22 
  • Because of the risks of sedation, dissociation, and respiratory depression, patients must be monitored for at least 2 hours at each treatment session (including pulse oximetry), followed by an assessment to determine when the patient is considered clinically stable and ready to leave the healthcare setting.22
  • SPRAVATO may cause sedation or loss of consciousness. In some cases, patients may display diminished or less apparent breathing.22
  • In clinical trials, 0.3% to 0.4% of SPRAVATO-treated patients experienced loss of consciousness (corresponding to a MOAA/s score of 0).22

BACKGROUND

The MOAA/S was used to measure treatment-emergent sedation. MOAA/S scores correlate with the levels of sedation defined by the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) continuum. The level of sedation was scored on the MOAA/S 0-5 point scale9:

  • 0=no response to painful stimulus (corresponding to ASA continuum for general anesthesia).
  • 1=responds only after painful stimulus.
  • 2=responds only after mild prodding or shaking.
  • 3=responds only after name is called loudly and/or repeatedly.
  • 4=lethargic response to name spoken in normal tone.
  • 5=readily responds to name spoken in normal tone (awake; corresponding to ASA continuum for minimal sedation).

In the phase 3 program mild sedation corresponded with MOAA/S score 4, while moderate or greater sedation was defined as MOAA/S score ≤3.9

CLINICAL DATA

Spontaneously reported TEAEs of sedation and somnolence, as well as results based on the MOAA/S scale in the phase 3 clinical programs for TRD and Major Depressive Disorder with Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior (MDSI) are presented in Table: TEAEs of Sedation/Somnolence and/or MOAA/S.

Sedative effects on the MOAA/S typically showed an onset at around 15 minutes after the first dose was administered, with symptoms peaking at 30 to 45 minutes postdose and generally resolving (ie, MOAA/S score of 5) by 1 to 1.5 hours postdose.2,3,9,10

Across all phase 2 and 3 TRD studies, the most frequently reported level of sedation in both adult and elderly subjects was mild sedation (corresponding to a MOAA/S score of 4).9 A total of 10 patients with TRD in the SPRAVATO+oral AD arm and 1 in the oral AD+placebo (PBO) arm had MOAA/S scores of 0 or 1 at any time point during phase 3 studies, corresponding to severe sedation. These events generally did not recur with subsequent dosing. Of the 10 patients in the SPRAVATO+oral AD arm, 2 patients with a MOAA/S score of 1 also received a concomitant benzodiazepine on the day before dosing.9,23

Of note, in cases of reported sedation, no symptoms of respiratory distress were observed, and hemodynamic parameters (including vital signs and oxygen saturation) remained within normal limits.9,10

  • TRD studies: In total, 4 patients out of the 1599 SPRAVATO-treated patients with MOAA/S scores had a score on the MOAA/S scale of 0, ie, deeply sedated and did not respond to trapezius muscle squeeze. These events were rare, and all resolved on the dosing day without any medical intervention. In all cases, pulse oximetry was within normal range, with no evidence of respiratory depression. Of note, 1 patient was taking zopiclone (non-benzodiazepine hypnotic) every night for sleeplessness, including the nights preceding intranasal dosing days. Following the events, it was noted that SPRAVATO was discontinued in 1 patient while 1 patient received a dose decrease to 56 mg.9
  • MDSI studies: One patient had MOAA/S scores of 0 and 1 on multiple dosing days. On those dosing days, the patient’s vital signs were within normal range, and the patient did not require medical intervention.10

TEAEs of Sedation/Somnolence and MOAA/S
PHASE 3 TRIALS IN TRD
ACUTE TRIALS
Trial Design
Sedation and/or Somnolence Ratesa,b and/or MOAA/S
Popova et al (2019)2 conducted a 4-week, randomized, DB, active-controlled, multinational study to compare the efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed SPRAVATO nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral AD vs a newly initiated oral AD+PBO nasal spray in adult patients (18-64 years) with TRD
Study Treatment
Patients self-administered either SPRAVATO or PBO 2 times per week for 4 weeks during the DB phase under supervision of clinical staff.
A new oral OL AD (duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine XR) was administered daily for the duration of the DB phase following a fixed titration schedule.
Study Groups
  • 56 or 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=114); SPRAVATO was started on day 1 at 56 mg for all
  • Oral AD+PBO (n=109)
Somnolence (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 13% (n=15)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 6.4% (n=7)

Percent of patients with MOAA/S ≤4 at any postdose time during DB phase
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 57.4% (n=66/115)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 10.1% (n=11/109)
Fedgchin et al (2019)3 conducted a 4-week, randomized, DB, active-controlled, multinational study to compare the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose SPRAVATO plus a newly initiated oral AD vs a newly initiated oral AD+PBO in adult patients (18-64 years) with TRD
Study Treatment
Patients self-administered either SPRAVATO or PBO 2 times per week for 4 weeks during the DB phase under supervision of clinical staff. A new oral OL AD was initiated (see Popova et al above).
Study Groups
  • 56 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=115)
  • 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=114); SPRAVATO was started on day 1 at 56 mg
  • Oral AD+PBO (n=113)
Somnolence (DB phase)
  • 56 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD: 20.9% (n=24)
  • 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD: 18.1% (n=21)
  • PBO+oral AD: 11.5% (n=13)

Sedation (DB phase)
  • 56 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD: 5.2% (n=6)
  • 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD: 6.9% (n=8)
  • PBO+oral AD: 0.9% (n=1)

Percent of patients with MOAA/S ≤3 at any postdose time during DB phase3
  • 56 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD: 9.6% (n=11)
  • 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD: 12.1% (n=14/116)
  • PBO+oral AD: 0.9% (n=1)
Ochs-Ross et al (2020)4 conducted a 4-week, randomized, DB, active-controlled, multicenter study in elderly patients (≥65 years) with TRD which assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of flexible doses of SPRAVATO plus a newly initiated oral AD compared with a newly initiated oral AD+PBO.
Study Treatment
Patients self-administered either SPRAVATO or PBO 2 times per week for 4 weeks during the DB phase under supervision of clinical staff. A new oral OL AD was initiated (see Popova et al above).
Study groups
  • 28, 56, or 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=72); SPRAVATO was started on day 1 at 28 mg
  • Oral AD+PBO (n=65)
Somnolence (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 1.4% (n=1)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 4.6% (n=3)

Percent of patients with MOAA/S ≤3 at any postdose time during DB phase4
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 8.3% (n=6)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 1.5% (n=1)
Chen et al (2023)24 conducted a randomized, DB, active-controlled, multicenter study in patients with TRD aged 18-64 years in China and the USA to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed (56 or 84 mg) SPRAVATO+oral AD vs oral AD+PBO after 4 weeks of treatment.
Study Treatment
Patients self-administered either SPRAVATO or PBO 2 times per week for 4 weeks during the DB phase under supervision of clinical staff. A new OL oral AD was initiated (see the Popova et al [2019] study above).
Study Groups
  • 56 or 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=126); SPRAVATO was started on day 1 at 28 mg
  • Oral AD+PBO (n=126)
Somnolence (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 20/126 (15.9%)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 11/126 (8.7%)
LONG-TERM TRIALS
Daly et al (2019)5 conducted a long-term, DB, active-controlled, randomized-withdrawal, maintenance study to assess the efficacy of flexibly-dosed SPRAVATO plus an oral AD compared with an oral AD+PBO in delaying relapse of depressive symptoms in patients with TRD who were stable responders and remitters after an initial 16 weeks of treatment with SPRAVATO+oral AD.
Study Treatment
During the IND phase (initial 4 weeks), patients self-administered either SPRAVATO or PBO 2 times per week. In the OP (12 weeks) and MA (variable duration) phases, nasal spray medication was administered weekly for the first 4 weeks, then individualized to once weekly or once every other week based on severity of depression symptoms.
A new oral OL AD (duloxetine, escitalopram, sertraline, or venlafaxine XR) was administered daily for the duration of the IND phase following a fixed titration schedule and remaining unchanged during the OP/M phase.
Study Groups
  • 56 or 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=152); SPRAVATO was started on day 1 at 56 mg.
  • Oral AD+PBO (n=145).
Somnolence (DB Maintenance phase)
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 21.1% (n=32)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 2.1% (n=3)

Sedation (DB Maintenance phase)
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 6.6% (n=10)
  • Oral AD+PBO: 0.7% (n=1)
Wajs et al (2020)6 conducted an OL, multicenter, study to evaluate the long-term (up to 1 year of exposure) safety, tolerability and efficacy of flexibly-dosed SPRAVATO nasal spray (28, 56 or 84 mg) plus a newly initiated oral AD in patients with TRD.
Study Treatment
During the IND phase (initial 4 weeks), patients self-administered either SPRAVATO or PBO 2 times per week. In the OP/M phase (48 weeks), nasal spray medication was reduced to once weekly for the first 4 weeks, and then individualized to once weekly or once every other week based on severity of depression symptoms. A new oral OL AD was initiated (see Daly et al above).
Study Groups
  • 28, 56, or 84 mg SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=802); SPRAVATO was started on day 1 at 28 mg for patients ≥65 years and 56 mg for all other patients.
Somnolence (all phases)
SPRAVATO+oral AD: 16.7% (n=134)
In a post hoc analysis, severe sedation was defined as MOAA/S score of 0 or 1.25 During the IND phase (n=779) and OP/M phase (n=603), severe sedation was reported in 4 patients (0.5%) and in 1 patient (0.2%), respectively. There was no evidence of respiratory depression in any of these cases. Discontinuation of the study due to an AE of sedation occurred in 3 patients during the IND phase and none during the OP/M phase.
In another post hoc analysis that compared efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO+oral AD in younger (18 to 64 years; IND, n=624; OP/M, n=477) vs older (≥65 years; IND, n=155; OP/M, n=126) patients, somnolence was reported in 12.3% vs 11.0% of patients in the IND phase and 13.8% vs 15.1% of patients in the OP/M phase; sedation was reported in 6.7% vs 5.8% of patients in the IND phase and 5.0% vs 4.0% of patients in the OP/M phase.26
Zaki et al (2023)27 conducted an OL extension study to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of individualized, intermittently dosed SPRAVATO+oral AD in patients with TRD.
Study Treatment
During the induction phase (initial 4 weeks), patients self-administered a flexible dose of SPRAVATO 2 times per week. In the OP/MA phase (variable duration), patients administered SPRAVATO once weekly, every other week, or every 4 weeks based on CGI-S and tolerability.
Study Groups
Starting dose of 28 mg (patients aged ≥65 years), 56 mg, or 84 mg SPRAVATO (N=1148): induction phase, n=458; OP/MA phase, n=1110 (690 were directly enrolled; 420 were continued from the induction phase).
Somnolence (all phases)
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 265/1148 (23.1%)
Reif et al (2023)28 conducted an OL, 32-week, randomized, phase 3b study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO vs QUE-XR in combination with ongoing oral AD (SSRI or SNRI) in the treatment of patients with TRD.
Study Treatment
In the treatment phase (initial 8 weeks) patients were randomized to receive flexible doses of SPRAVATO+oral AD or QUE-XR+oral AD; flexible dosing was continued for 24 weeks in the maintenance phase. SPRAVATO was administered 2 times per week during weeks 1-4, once weekly during weeks 5-8, and once weekly or every other week during weeks 9-32.29
Study Groups
  • 56 mg or 84 mg (28 mg option for those of Japanese ancestry aged 65 to ≤74 years) SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=336; safety analysis set, n=334)
  • 50 mg on day 1, increasing to 150-300 mg/day QUE-XR+oral AD (n=340; safety analysis set, n=336)
Somnolence (all phases)29
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 50/334 (15.0%)
  • QUE-XR+oral AD: 78/336 (23.2%)

Sedation (all phases)29
  • SPRAVATO+oral AD: 22/334 (6.6%)
  • QUE-XR+oral AD: 29/336 (8.6%)
  • Seven (2.1%) and 5 (1.5%) patients discontinued treatment in the QUE-XR+oral AD group due to sedation and somnolence, respectively; none discontinued in the SPRAVATO+oral AD group due to sedation or somnolence.
Phase 3 Trials in MDSI
Fu et al (2020)7 conducted a DB, randomized, PBO-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO 84 mg plus comprehensive SOCc in patients with MDSI.
Study Treatment
Patients received either SPRAVATO+SOCc or PBO+SOC 2 times per week for 4 weeks followed by ~2 months of follow-up with SOC only.
Study Groups
84 mg SPRAVATO+SOC (n=114)
PBO+SOC (n=112)
Somnolence (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+SOC: 18.6% (n=21/113)
  • PBO+SOC: 9.8% (n=11)

Sedation (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+SOC: 6.2% (n=7/113)
  • PBO+SOC: 1.8% (n=2)

Percent of patients with MOAA/S ≤3 at any postdose time during DB phase
  • SPRAVATO+SOC: 11.5% (n=13/113)
  • PBO+SOC: 0.9% (n=1)
Ionescu et al (2021)8 conducted a second identically designed study as above
Study Groups
84 mg SPRAVATO+SOC (n=115)
PBO+SOC (n=115)
Somnolence (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+SOC: 22.8% (n=26/114)
  • PBO+SOC: 10.6% (n=12/113)

Sedation (DB phase)
  • SPRAVATO+SOC: 14.0% (n=16/114)
  • PBO+SOC: 2.7% (n=3/113)

Percent of patients with MOAA/S ≤3 at any postdose time during DB phase
  • SPRAVATO+SOC: 18.4% (n=21/114)
  • PBO+SOC: 2.7% (n=3/113)
Abbreviations: AD, antidepressant; AE, adverse event; DB, double-blind; IND, induction; MDSI, Major Depressive Disorder with Acute Suicidal Ideation or Behavior; MOAA/S, Modified Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation; OL, open-label; OP/M, optimization and maintenance; PBO, placebo; QUE-XR, quetiapine extended release; SNRI, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SOC, standard of care; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event; TRD, treatment-resistant depression.
aTEAEs were reported if they occurred at a rate of ≥5% in any treatment group for TRANSFORM-1/2 and SUSTAIN-1; ≥10% for SUSTAIN-2, ASPIRE-1, and ASPIRE-2,
bDenominators for n’s only listed when different from n’s in the Study Design column.
cSOC consisted of newly initiated or optimized AD along with at least 5 days of initial hospitalization and enhanced by twice-weekly intensive visits during DB phase.

Post Hoc Analysis of Tolerability Trends During Postdose Monitoring

Williamson et al (2018)11 conducted a post hoc analysis of two 4-week, randomized, double-blind (DB) trials in patients with TRD.2,3 The objectives of the analysis were to measure if the incidence of specific AEs, including sedation, during the first week of treatment appeared to be associated with the incidence/frequency of the same AEs during week 2-4, and if the duration of time until patients were determined to be discharge-ready during week 1 was associated with the subsequent duration during weeks 2-4.

As illustrated in Table: Incidence of Somnolence in Week 1 and Incidence/Frequency of Somnolence in Weeks 2-4, the incidence of AEs of somnolence was 17.3% for 345 patients who received SPRAVATO+oral AD. Most patients (88.7%) did not report somnolence during the first week. Of those patients who experienced sedation once, twice, or not at all during the first week of treatment, the table below provides data on the associated proportion of patients who experienced a recurrence of sedation during the subsequent 3 weeks of treatment.


Incidence of Somnolence in Week 1 and Incidence/Frequency of Somnolence in Weeks 2-4a,11
AE
4-Week Incidence
Week 1 Incidenceb (Number of Monitoring Periods [0-2] AE Observed)
Number of Patients With AEs in Weeks 2-4
Number of Sessions (0-6) in Which an AE Was Experienced in Weeks 2-4
Somnolence
17.3%
None - 88.7% (n=306)

6.2% (n=19)
2.53
Once - 11.3% (n=39)

71.8% (n=28)
3.07
Twice - 2.9% (n=10)

100% (n=10)
4.13
Abbreviation: AE, adverse event.
aData sample was a combination of data from the 3 intranasal SPRAVATO groups from the fixed-dose and flexible-dose studies (n=345). bThe first-week incidence groups are not mutually exclusive - the “Twice” group is a subset of the “Once” group.

Williamson et al (2022)12 conducted a post hoc analysis of pooled data from SUSTAIN-1 and SUSTAIN-2 trials to characterize the recurrence of AEs for SPRAVATO based on AEs that occurred during the early and later courses of treatment. Incidence, frequency, and severity of the most common AEs (ie, dizziness, dissociation, nausea, vertigo, increased blood pressure, and sedation) were evaluated. The patients were monitored for ≥90 minutes after SPRAVATO administration at each treatment session. This analysis included adult (aged 18-64 years) patients with TRD who received SPRAVATO.

Sedation was reported in 3.8% (36/949) of patients in week 1, see Table: Rates of Sedation Recurrence According to Frequency of Sedation Occurrence in Week 1. The frequency of sedation in week 4 was more associated to later recurrence than its week 1 frequency.


Rates of Sedation Recurrence According to Frequency of Sedation Occurrence in Week 112
Postdose Monitoring Period
No. of Patients
Overall Incidence (%)
None in Week 1, % (n/N)a
Once in Week 1, % (n/N)a,b
Twice in Week 1, % (n/N)a,c
Weeks 2-4
949
4.0
2.1 (19/913)
36.8 (7/19)
70.6 (12/17)
Weeks 5-8
918
2.6
1.2 (11/883)
22.2 (4/18)
52.9 (9/17)
Months 3-6
595
3.4
3.0 (17/575)
0 (0/9)
36.4 (4/11)
Months 6-12
595
2.5
1.7 (10/575)
0 (0/9)
45.5 (5/11)
Abbreviation: AE, adverse event.an/N represents the number of patients who experienced a recurrence of sedation/number of patients who contributed data to the time period depicted in the row.
bDepict ≥10% of difference in AE recurrence rates between occurrence once per week vs none in week 1.
cDepict ≥10% of difference in AE recurrence rates between occurrence twice vs once per week in week 1.

On stratifying patients based on the level of sedation observed during weeks 1 and 4, the average severity during recurrent episodes was reflective of mild sedation (MOAA/S score, 3.5-4.0); 1 patient had a mean MOAA/S score of 3.25, indicating moderate sedation.

Post Hoc Analysis of MDSI Studies

Fua et al (2020)30 performed a post hoc analysis of patients with MDSI (pooled data from ASPIRE I AND ASPIRE II trials), which found 10.1% of patients (23/227) who had received SPRAVATO+standard of care (SOC) and 2.2% of patients (5/225) who had received PBO+SOC experienced clinician-reported sedation, with no clinician reports of severe sedation in either group. Deep sedation or a MOAA/S score ≤1 occurred in one patient who received SPRAVATO+SOC and in no patients who received PBO+SOC. Discontinuations due to sedation of any severity occurred in 0.4% of patients (1/227) who received SPRAVATO+SOC and in no patients who received PBO+SOC.

Real-world Retrospective Studies

Study Design
Results
Gutiérrez-Rojas et al (2025)13 conducted a study in 71 patients (mean age, 54.6 years; female, 70.4%) with TRD who received SPRAVATO for up to 6 months via an early access program in Spain.
Sedation was reported in 31.0% (n=22) of patients.
Samalin et al (2024)14 conducted a study in 157 adult patients (mean age, 49.1 years; female, 66.2%) in France with moderate to severe TRD who were treated with SPRAVATO for up to 12 months (ESKALE study).
Sedation was reported in 14.6% of patients.
Somnolence was reported in 15.9% of patients, and 5 patients discontinued treatment due to somnolence.
Martinotti et al (2022)15 conducted a study (REAL-ESK study) in Italy to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of SPRAVATO in 116 patients (mean age, 50 years; female, 52.6%) with TRD who were treated for up to 3 months.
Rosso et al (2025)16 reported the 6- and 12-month follow-up of the REAL-ESK study in 78 patients (mean age, 51.8 years; female, 55.1%).
Sedation was reported in 28.4% of patients during the REAL-ESK study.15
In the 6-month follow-up, sedation was reported in 31.7% of patients.16
Brendle et al (2022)17 conducted a study in 171 patients (mean age, 36 years; female, 60.0%) with TRD who received SPRAVATO in an outpatient clinic from July 2019 to June 2021.
Sedation was reported in 22.0% (n=38) of patients. Of these patients, 74.0% experienced sedation onset within the first 30 minutes or 1 hour after SPRAVATO treatment; 97.0% (n=37/38) of patients with symptoms resolved within 2 hours.
Abbreviation: TRD, treatment-resistant depression.

Postmarketing Safety Data

REMS Database

REMS patient monitoring forms completed by certified United States healthcare settings and pharmacies from 5 March 2019 to 5 January 2024, identified 58,483 patients who received ≥1 SPRAVATO treatment for a total of 1,486,213 treatment sessions. Sedation was reported in 61.9% of patients in 34.7% of treatment sessions. Sedation rate decreased during the induction phase (sessions 1-8) and remained relatively consistent in the early (sessions 9-12) and late (sessions ≥13) maintenance phases, and it was consistent across sexes and age groups (<25 years, 25-55 years, and >55 years). There was a total of 2096 serious AEs, of which 1.2% (n=26) were sedation.18

Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

An analysis of the FAERS database (from the first quarter of 2019 to the fourth quarter of 2023) evaluating 14,606 SPRAVATO-related AEs reported sedation (n=688 cases; reporting odds ratio, 172.68 [95% confidence interval (CI), 159.08-187.46]; proportional reporting ratio, 155.53 [95% CI, 144.36-167.57]; empirical Bayesian geometric mean [EBGM], 142.05 [lower limit of 90% CI for EBGM, 130.85]) as among the 5 most frequently reported AEs.19 

Limitations of the FAERS database include the inability to infer causality, barriers to reporting, limitations in the quality of information received, and the inability to calculate the incidence rates of the events.31

Postmarketing safety data related to respiratory depression symptoms reported with concurrent sedation and/or dissociation

An evaluation of the Janssen Global Medical Safety Database (from March 2019 through January 2023) identified 50 cases that involved patients who had clinical symptoms of respiratory depression on the day of administration, and either had respiratory rates and/or oxygen saturation levels below thresholds (≤10 breaths per minute and/or oxygen saturation ≤93%) or cases that failed to report either or both values.20 Of those cases, 25 were reported with concurrent respiratory depression AEs and sedation and/or dissociation (20/25 were serious AEs). AEs included dyspnea (13), oxygen saturation decreased (3), respiratory distress (2), respiratory rate decreased (2), apnea (1), cardio-respiratory arrest (1), hypopnea (1), respiratory abnormal (1), respiratory arrest (1), and respiratory disorder (1). Eighteen of these cases reported the patient as recovered (17) or recovering (1); 1 case not recovered; and 6 cases had 7 AEs with unknown outcomes (1 case involved more than 1 AE/outcome). Ten cases reported both sedation and dissociation, 9 cases reported sedation, and 6 cases reported dissociation.

Interventions were reported in 17 cases, which included hospital/emergency room services (6), medication (3), oxygen (3), stimulation (2), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1), rescue breathing (1) and an unspecified intervention (1). Eight cases did not document an intervention. In 9 cases, patients were ready for discharge within the 2-hour observation period. In the remaining cases, patients were assessed as not ready for discharge within the 2-hour monitoring period (13), or discharge readiness was not reported (3).20

In the majority of cases, patients were using concomitant medications or had comorbidities, including anxiety disorder, obesity, alcohol abuse, and hypothyroidism (although respiratory depression cannot be attributed to these factors).20

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 29 April 2025.

Case reports and case series (except the ones reporting management of sedation and somnolence) and real-world studies with <50 patients treated with SPRAVATO were excluded.

References

1 European Medicines Agency (EMA). Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). SPRAVATO assessment report. Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/004535/0000. 2019- [cited 2025 May 5]. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/assessment-report/spravato-epar-public-assessment-report_en.pdf
2 Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray combined with a newly initiated oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized double-blind active-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176(6):428-438.  
3 Fedgchin M, Trivedi M, Daly EJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose esketamine nasal spray combined with a new oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (TRANSFORM-1). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(10):616-630.  
4 Ochs-Ross R, Daly EJ, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant in elderly patients with treatment-resistant depression - TRANSFORM-3. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;28(2):121-141.  
5 Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Supplement to: Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant treatment for relapse prevention in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(9):893-903.  
6 Wajs E, Aluisio L, Holder R, et al. Esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant in patients with treatment-resistant depression: assessment of long-term safety in a phase 3, open-label study (SUSTAIN-2). J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(3):19m12891.  
7 Fu DJ, Ionescu DF, Li X, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for rapid reduction of major depressive disorder symptoms in patients who have active suicidal ideation with intent: double-blind, randomized study (ASPIRE I). J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(3):19m13191.  
8 Ionescu DF, Fu DJ, Qiu X, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for rapid reduction of depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicide ideation with intent: results of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study (ASPIRE II). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;24(1):22-31.  
9 Data on File. Esketamine. Integrated Summary of Safety - TRD. Janssen Research & Development, LLC; 2018.  
10 Data on File. Esketamine. Integrated Summary of Safety - MDD and Suicidal Ideation with Intent. Janssen Research & Development, LLC; 2019.  
11 Williamson D, Gogate J, Starr L, et al. Esketamine nasal spray tolerability trends during post-dose monitoring in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Poster presented at: US Psych Congress; October 25-28, 2018; Orlando, FL.  
12 Williamson DJ, Gogate JP, Sliwa JK, et al. Longitudinal course of adverse events with esketamine nasal spray: a post hoc analysis of pooled data from phase 3 trials in patients with treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(6):21m14318.  
13 Gutiérrez-Rojas L, Vendrell-Serres J, Ramos-Quiroga JA, et al. Compassionate use of esketamine intranasal in patients with severe major depressive disorder resistant to the treatment. J Psychopharmacol. 2025;39(1):38-48.  
14 Samalin L, Mekaoui L, Rothärmel M, et al. Use of esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression in routine practice: a real-world French study. Depress Anxiety. 2024;2024:7262794.  
15 Martinotti G, Vita A, Fagiolini A, et al. Real-world experience of esketamine use to manage treatment-resistant depression: a multicentric study on safety and effectiveness (REAL-ESK study). J Affect Disord. 2022;319:646-654.  
16 Rosso G, d’Andrea G, Barlati S, et al. Esketamine treatment trajectory of patients with treatment-resistant depression in the mid and long-term run: data from REAL-ESK study group. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2025;23(5):612-619.  
17 Brendle M, Ahuja S, Valle MD, et al. Safety and effectiveness of intranasal esketamine for treatment-resistant depression: a real-world retrospective study. J Comp Eff Res. 2022;11(18):1323-1336.  
18 Ahmed M, Himedan M, Cabrera P, et al. Real-world safety profile of esketamine nasal spray: an analysis of the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy program approximately 5 years after approval in the United States. Poster presented at: Psych Congress; October 29-November 2, 2024; Boston, MA.  
19 Liu R, Liu C, Feng D, et al. Pharmacovigilance of esketamine nasal spray: an analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system database. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1414703.  
20 Data on File. Esketamine and respiratory depression cumulative review through 08 February 2023. Janssen Research & Development, LLC; 2023.  
21 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Summary Review. NDA 211243 - SPRAVATO (esketamine) - Reference ID: 4398871. 2019-[cited 2025 May 5]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2019/211243Orig1s000SumR.pdf
22 SPRAVATO (esketamine) nasal spray [Prescribing Information]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc;https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/SPRAVATO-pi.pdf
23 Hough D. Esketamine. United States Food & Drug Administration February 2019 presentation- [cited 2025 May 5]. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20191215093404/https://www.fda.gov/media/121379/download
24 Chen X, Hou X, Bai D, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled study conducted in China and USA. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023;19:693-707.  
25 Fua S, Gogate J, Starr HL, et al. The relationship between adverse event reporting and events identified by scales/vital sign measurement with esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression (SUSTAIN-2 Study). Poster presented at: The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials Methodology (ISCTM); February 19-21, 2019; Washington, DC.  
26 Ochs-Ross R, Wajs E, Daly EJ, et al. Comparison of long-term efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant in younger versus older patients with treatment-resistant depression: post-hoc analysis of SUSTAIN-2, a long-term open-label phase 3 safety and efficacy study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;30(5):541-556.  
27 Zaki N, Chen LN, Lane R, et al. Long-term safety and maintenance of response with esketamine nasal spray in treatment-resistant depression: final results of the SUSTAIN-3 study. Poster presented at: Psych Congress; September 6-10, 2023; Nashville, TN.  
28 Reif A, Bitter I, Buyze J, et al. Esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine for treatment-resistant depression. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(14):1298-1309.  
29 Reif A, Bitter I, Buyze J, et al. Supplement to: Esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine for treatment-resistant depression. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(14):1298-1309.  
30 Fua S, Turkoz I, Nash A, et al. Incidence and outcomes of severe safety events of interest occurring with esketamine nasal spray in conjunction with standard of care antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent. Poster presented at: American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) 34th Annual Conference; September 30 - October 4, 2020; Virtual Meeting.  
31 FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. Accessed 2025-05-05. Available via: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard
Endchat
Chat live