This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Adverse Event of SPRAVATO - Cardiovascular Effects

Last Updated: 04/11/2025

SUMMARY

  • SPRAVATO nasal spray is contraindicated in patients for whom an increase in blood pressure (BP) or intracranial pressure poses a serious risk (e.g., aneurysmal vascular disease, arteriovenous malformation, and history of intracerebral hemorrhage).1
  • Concomitant use with psychostimulants and monoamine oxidase inhibitors may increase BP.1
  • During phase 3 studies, a formal screening for aneurysmal vascular disease was not conducted. Presence of aneurysmal disease was determined by the site investigator based on the patient’s medical history and assessment at screening.2
  • SPRAVATO causes increases in systolic BP (SBP) and/or diastolic BP (DBP) at all recommended dosages. Increases in BP peak at approximately 40 minutes after SPRAVATO administration and last approximately 4 hours.1
    • While the mechanism by which SPRAVATO nasal spray or ketamine increases BP is not fully known, the literature suggests that ketamine blocks the reuptake of catecholamines and stimulates alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors.3-6
  • During phase 3 trials in treatment-resistant depression (TRD), investigators were instructed to withhold ESK dosing if predose SBP was >140 mmHg (>150 mmHg for those >65 years of age) or DBP was >90 mmHg. Those with elevated BPs were referred to a specialist or general practitioner for evaluation and potential treatment.7
  • BP should be monitored after ESK administration. Measure BP around 40 minutes post dose and subsequently as clinically warranted until values decline.8 If BP remains high, promptly seek assistance from practitioners experienced in BP management.9
  • In phase 2/3 trials for TRD, increased BP was reported as an adverse event (AE) in 12.8% of SPRAVATO-treated patients and abnormal heart rate was reported in 3.0% of all SPRAVATO-treated patients. Most AEs had an onset shortly after dosing and resolved 1.5 hours post-dose while patients were still in the clinic.7
  • A post hoc analysis of 2 long-term studies (SUSTAIN -1 and -2) in TRD found that patients who experienced an increase in BP during the first week of treatment with SPRAVATO were more likely to have recurrence during subsequent weeks.10
  • A post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN-2 comparing the efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO nasal spray in younger (18-64 years) vs older (≥65 years) patients with TRD reported incidence of increased BP during induction (IND) (6.9% [43/624] vs 6.5% [10/155]) and optimization/maintenance (OP/MA) phases (7.1% [34/477] vs 9.5% [12/126]).11
  • Discontinuations of SPRAVATO treatment due to increased BP and tachycardia were reported at rates <2% across all completed studies in TRD.7
    • Across 5 phase 3 studies, 13 patients on SPRAVATO+oral AD discontinued study medication due to AEs related to increased BP.
  • In the TRD clinical studies, unless clinically indicated, it was recommended that transient increases in BP not be treated, as the BP typically returns to predose values within 2 hours following SPRAVATO administration.12,13See Management of High Blood Pressure.
  • Clinical data indicate a lack of clinically relevant QTc prolongation at therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of SPRAVATO.7 See Effects on Cardiac Electrophysiology and QT/QTc Interval.
  • Real-world studies reported rates of increased BP between 10.0% to 14.0%.14,15 
  • In an analysis of postmarketing safety data from the SPRAVATO Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) data from 5 March 2019 to 5 January 2024, increased BP was reported in 11.7% (6,818/58,483) of patients and in 0.9% (13,510/1,486,213) of treatment sessions.16 
  • In an analysis of postmarketing safety data from the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2023, 211 cases of increased BP and 237 cases of hypertension were reported.17,18 
  • Hypotension has been reported as a postmarketing adverse reaction.19 

CLINICAL studies

AEs Related to Increased BP Across Clinical Studies

Across 5 phase 39,20-23 and 1 phase 224 studies in TRD, AEs related to increased BP (DBP increased, BP increased, SBP increased, hypertension, hypertensive crisis, hypertensive heart disease) were reported in 12.8% of all SPRAVATO-treated patients (in double-blind [DB] trials: 11.6% vs. 3.9% in SPRAVATO+oral AD and oral AD+placebo [PBO], respectively; odds ratio [OR] 3.2 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9-5.8]), of which 98% of CV events were mild or moderate. Approximately 94% of the events resolved/were resolving.7

A phase 3 study in patients with major depressive disorder and active suicidal ideation with intent (MDSI) reported BP increases in 16% (19/113) of patients treated with 84 mg SPRAVATO+standard of care (SOC) and 5.4% (6/112) of those treated with PBO+SOC.25

In a 4-week, randomized, DB, active-controlled, multicenter study in China and the US that evaluated the efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed (56 or 84 mg) SPRAVATO+oral AD (n=126) vs PBO+oral AD (n=126) in patients with TRD, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) related to increased BP were reported in 30.2% (38/126) of the patients in the SPRAVATO+oral AD group and 10.3% (13/126) in the PBO+oral AD group. Discontinuation due to increased BP was reported in 1 patient (0.8%) in the SPRAVATO+oral AD group and none in the PBO+oral AD group.26

In SUSTAIN-3, a phase 3, open-label extension study, that evaluated the long-term (up to 6.5 years) safety and efficacy of flexibly-dosed SPRAVATO+oral AD in patients with TRD (N=1148), TEAEs related to increased BP were reported in 19.9% of patients, and discontinuation due to increased BP was reported in 0.5% of patients. Most events (≥95%) occurred and resolved on the same day of dosing, and an incidence of hypertensive emergency was reported in 1 (0.1%) patient.27

AEs Related to Heart Rate Across TRD Clinical Studies

Across 5 phase 39,20-23 and 1 phase 224 studies in TRD, AEs related to abnormal heart rate (extrasystoles, heart rate increased, palpitations, sinus tachycardia, and tachycardia) were reported in 3.0% of all SPRAVATO-treated patients (in DB trials: 1.6% vs. 0.8% in SPRAVATO+oral AD and oral AD+PBO, respectively; OR 1.9 [0.5, 8.6]), of which ~97% of CV events were mild or moderate. Approximately 88% of the events resolved/were resolving.7

Discontinuations of SPRAVATO treatment due to increased BP and tachycardia were reported at rates below 2% across the 5 phase 39,20-23 studies and 1 phase 224 study in TRD.7

Cardiovascular AEs of Clinical Interest in Phase 2/3 TRD Studies

Cardiovascular AEs of clinical interest (angina pectoris, cardiac failure acute, chest discomfort, chest pain, hypertensive heart disease) were reported in 1.3% of all SPRAVATO-treated patients (in DB trials: 0.5% vs. 0.4% in SPRAVATO+oral AD and oral AD+PBO, respectively; OR 1.3 [95% CI: 0.1-15.4]), of which ~74% of the events were mild to moderate. All events resolved/were resolving.7

Changes in BP Across Clinical Studies

SPRAVATO can cause increases in SBP and/or DBP which peak at approximately 40 minutes after drug administration and generally last approximately 4 hours.1

Based on 3 short-term studies9,22,23 in TRD, the mean PBO-adjusted increases in SBP and DBP over time were about 7 to 9 mmHg in SBP and 4 to 6 mmHg in DBP at 40 minutes post-dose and 2 to 5 mmHg in SBP and 1 to 3 mmHg in DBP at 1.5 hours post-dose in patients receiving ESK.28 Elevations in BP can be higher or longer in individual patients.

Across 3 short-term studies in TRD9,22,23, approximately 8% to 17% of SPRAVATO-treated patients and 1% to 3% of PBO-treated patients experienced an increase of more than 40 mmHg in SBP and/or 25 mmHg in DBP in the first 1.5 hours after administration at least once during the first 4 weeks of treatment. A substantial increase in BP could occur after any dose administered even if smaller BP effects were observed with previous administrations.7 See BP Increases in DB Randomized-Controlled, Short-Term Studies of SPRAVATO+Oral AD Compared to Oral AD+PBO in TRD


BP Increases in DB Randomized-Controlled, Short-Term Studies of SPRAVATO+Oral AD Compared to Oral AD+PBO in TRD28
Patients <65 years
Patients ≥65 years
SPRAVATO+Oral AD (N=346)
Oral AD+PBO (N=222)
SPRAVATO+Oral AD (N=72)
Oral AD+PBO (N=65)
Systolic Blood Pressure
   ≥180 mmHg
9 (3%)
-
2 (3%)
1 (2%)
   ≥40 mmHg increase
29 (8%)
1 (0.5%)
12 (17%)
1 (2%)
Diastolic Blood Pressure
   ≥110 mmHg
13 (4%)
1 (0.5%)
-
-
   ≥25 mmHg increase
46 (13%)
6 (3%)
10 (14%)
2 (3%)
Abbreviations: AD, antidepressant; PBO, placebo.
Note: TRANSFORM-1 and TRANSFORM-2 were short-term, double-blind, 4-week studies in patients <65 years of age who received treatment twice a week (1 was fixed-dose and 2 was flexible-dose); TRANSFORM-3 was a short-term, double-blind, flexible-dose, 4-week study in patients ≥65 years who received treatment twice a week.

Similar BP changes were observed in phase 3 clinical trials for patients with MDSI who were treated with ESK+SOC.13,25

In the phase 3 fixed-dose TRD study22, differences in the maximum mean changes in BP between the 56 mg and 84 mg doses of SPRAVATO were small and not suggestive of a dose response (SBP: 14.3 and 15.0 mmHg, respectively; DBP: 8.9 and 9.4 mmHg, respectively).7

Across completed studies of SPRAVATO in TRD, markedly abnormal elevations in BP (SBP ≥180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥110 mmHg) occurred at a higher rate in patients with a history of hypertension vs without a history of hypertension.7

  • 5.5%-7.6% of patients aged 18-64 with a history of hypertension vs 4.1%-4.3% of patients without had markedly abnormal elevations in BP.
  • 14.6% of elderly patients with a history of hypertension vs 6.5% of patients without had markedly abnormal elevations in BP.

Post Hoc Analysis of Vital Sign Measurement and BP Reporting

Fua et al (2019)29 conducted a post hoc analysis of an open-label, flexibly-dosed study (SUSTAIN-2)21 that evaluated the long-term safety of SPRAVATO+oral AD in patients with TRD. Patients received treatment twice a week for the first 4 weeks (IND), weekly for the next 4 weeks, and then once every 2 weeks or weekly thereafter (up to 48-week OP/MA phase). The objective was to examine the relationship between spontaneously reported AEs and events identified by vital sign data for safety evaluation in SUSTAIN-2.

In the IND phase (N=779), acute hypertension (SBP ≥180 mmHg or DBP ≥110 mmHg) was reported in 18 patients (2.3%), and discontinuation due to increased BP or hypertension occurred in 6 patients (0.8%) (4 of the 6 patients met criteria for acute hypertension). In the OP/MA phase (N=603), acute hypertension was reported in 18 patients (3.0%), and discontinuation due to increased BP or hypertension occurred in 3 patients (0.5%) (1 of the 3 patients met criteria for acute hypertension).

TEAEs of angina pectoris, coronary artery disease, ventricular arrhythmia, and arrhythmia were reported in 3 patients with a prior history of hypertension. All 3 discontinued the study and recovered.

A 60-year-old male patient died from acute cardiac and respiratory failure 5 days after receiving SPRAVATO 56 mg (study day 113). The patient had normal BP during the study but had a history of hypertension, obesity and right lower limb vein surgery. His death was considered by investigators to be doubtfully related to SPRAVATO.

Williamson et al (2022)10 conducted a post hoc analysis of pooled data from 2 long-term TRD studies20,21 to evaluate whether the incidence of increased BP during weeks 1 and 4 of treatment predicted the recurrence of this AE as a spontaneously reported AE with long-term treatment.10 Results showed that if BP increase was not reported in week 1, ≤4% of patients experienced this AE during subsequent weeks (see Table: Rates of Increased Blood Pressure Recurrence According to the Frequency of Increased Blood Pressure Occurrence in Week 1). Compared with week 1, the occurrence of BP in week 4 was more closely associated with later recurrence.


Rates of Increased Blood Pressure Recurrence According to the Frequency of Increased Blood Pressure Occurrence in Week 110,a
Post-dose Monitoring Period
No. of Patients
Overall Rate, %
None in Week 1 , % (n/N)
Once in Week 1, % (n/N)
Twice in Week 1, % (n/N)c
Weeks 2-4
949
5.1
2.3 (21/908)
56.5 (13/23)b
77.8 (14/18)
Weeks 5-8
918
3.9
1.9 (17/878)
40.9 (9/22)b
55.6 (10/18)
Months 3-6
595
4.2
3.0 (17/574)
36.4 (4/11)b
40.0 (4/10)
Months 6-12
595
2.2
1.7 (10/574)
9.1 (1/11)
20.0 (2/10)
Abbreviation: AE, adverse event.an/N represents the number of patients who experienced a recurrence of increased blood pressure/number of patients who contributed data to the period depicted in the row.
bDepicts ≥10% difference in AE recurrence rates between occurrence once per week vs none in week 1.cDepicts ≥10% difference in AE recurrence rates between occurrence twice vs once per week in week 1.

Fua et al (2020)30 performed a post hoc analysis of patients with MDSI (pooled data from the ASPIRE I and ASPIRE II trials), which found 15% of patients (34/227) who had received SPRAVATO+SOC and 4.9% of patients (11/225) who had received PBO+SOC experienced clinician-reported hypertension. Among the SPRAVATO+SOC group, clinician-reported severe hypertension, defined as distress that caused significant impairment in function and prevented normal daily activities, occurred in 5 patients (2.2%). Further, 9 SPRAVATO+SOC patients (4%) vs. 5 PBO+SOC patients (2.2%) experienced acute hypertension, defined as a BP of ≥180/110 mmHg. Two patients in the SPRAVATO+SOC group and 1 in the PBO+SOC group discontinued treatment due to hypertension. All severe hypertensive TEAEs resolved on the same day of dosing. No cases of severe (non-HTN) cardiovascular TEAEs were reported on the day that the dose was given.

Ochs-Ross et al (2022)11 performed a post hoc analysis of the long-term (1-year), open-label, multicenter, phase 3 SUSTAIN-2 study to compare the efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO nasal spray in younger (18-64 years) vs older (≥65 years) patients with TRD. For results, See Table: Summary of BP-Related Changes in the IND and OP/MA Phases.


Summary of BP-Related Changes in the IND and OP/MA Phases11
IND
OP/MA
Younger
(18-64 Years)
n=624
Older
(≥65 Years) n=155
Younger
(18-64 Years) n=477
Older
(≥65 Years) n=126
Incidence of increased BP (≥5% of patient), n (%)
43 (6.9)
10 (6.5)
34 (7.1)
12 (9.5)
Mean (SD) increase in BP, mmHg
   SBP
8.4 (11.4)
11.5 (13.7)
8.8 (10.9)
13.9 (11.78)
   DBP
6.0 (8.3)
5.3 (7.7)
6.5 (7.3)
6.5 (7.2)
Acute hypertensiona, n (%)
13 (2.1)
5 (3.2)
10 (2.1)
8 (6.3)
   SBP ≥180 mmHg
5 (0.8)
5 (3.2)
2 (0.4)
8 (6.3)
   DBP ≥110 mmHg
10 (1.6)
0
9 (1.9)
1 (0.8)
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; IND, induction; MA, maintenance; OP, optimization; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SD, standard deviation.
aAcute hypertension was defined as SBP ≥180mmHg, or DBP ≥110 mmHg. About 134 younger patients, and 86 older patients had hypertension at baseline.

McIntyre et al (2024)31 conducted a secondary safety and tolerability analysis of the ESCAPE-TRD32 study, a 32-week, randomized, phase 3b study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of SPRAVATO vs quetiapine extended-release (QUE-XR) in the treatment of patients with TRD.31 Serious TEAEs of acute coronary syndrome and atrial fibrillation were reported in 1 patient each (0.3%) from the 334 patients in the SPRAVATO group and in none of the 336 patients in the QUE-XR group.33 Abnormal BP was reported in a small percentage of patients (see Table: Treatment-Emergent Abnormally Low/High Blood Pressure).


Treatment-Emergent Abnormally Low/High Blood pressure31
Parameter, n (%)
SPRAVATO
n=334
QUE-XR
n=336
Increase in BP
   SBPa
2 (0.6)
0 (0.0)
   DBPb
15 (4.5)
1 (0.3)
Decrease in BP
   SBPc
10 (3.0)
8 (2.4)
   DBPd
6 (1.8)
2 (0.6)
Acute hypertension
   SBP ≥180 mmHg or DBP ≥110 mmHg
7 (2.1)
0 (0.0)
Abbreviations: BP, blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
aIncrease of ≥20 mmHg and value ≥180 mmHg; bIncrease of ≥15 mmHg and value ≥105 mmHg; cdecrease by ≥20 mmHg and value ≤90 mmHg; ddecrease by ≥15 mmHg and value ≤50 mmHg.

Treatment-emergent acute hypertension was reported in 2.1% of patients in the SPRAVATO group and in none of the patients in the QUE-XR group. Hypertension was not associated with study discontinuation in any of the groups.31

EffectS ON cardiac electrophysiology and QT/QTc interval

Across all completed phase 2 and 3 TRD studies, there was no clinically relevant effect on ECG parameters observed.7

The effect of SPRAVATO (84 mg nasal spray and 0.8 mg/kg SPRAVATO intravenously infused over 40 minutes) on the QTc interval was evaluated in a randomized, DB, PBO-, and positive-controlled (moxifloxacin 400 mg), 4-period, crossover study in 60 healthy subjects. The mean difference from PBO for the change in baseline-corrected QTcF over a 30-hour post-dose interval fell below the accepted threshold of 10 ms for both SPRAVATO nasal spray and IV (nasal spray: -2.02 ms to 2.16 ms; IV: -3.51 ms to 4.89 ms). These results suggest that therapeutic and supratherapeutic doses of SPRAVATO do not prolong the QTcF interval.7

Real-World Retrospective Studies

Study Design
Results
Samalin et al (2024)14 conducted a retrospective study in 157 adult patients (mean age, 49.1 years; female, 66.2%) in France with moderate to severe TRD who were treated with SPRAVATO for up to 12 months in a real-world setting (ESKALE study).
Over the study period, 66.2% (n=104) of patients reported ≥1 AE, including increased BP (14.0%; n=22).
Cardiac disorder was reported in 0.6% of patients (n=1).
Increased BP as an SAE was reported in 0.6% of patients (n=1).
Increased BP AEs led to permanent discontinuation of SPRAVATO in 6 patients.

Chepke et al (2024)34 evaluated the Janssen Global Medical Safety database for SPRAVATO (from March 2019 through February 2023) to identify postmarketing reports of respiratory depression.
Cardiorespiratory arrest was reported in 1 patient. The event was observed in relation to sedation and/or dissociation during the treatment. The patient had a history of syncope, very low BP, hypothyroidism, and who had used a cardiac loop recorder. Concomitant medications reported included lithium, clonazepam, eszopiclone, trazodone, and bupropion. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed, which resulted in reinitiation of their pulse and respiration. The patient was taken to the emergency department and was discharged on the same day.
Martinotti et al (2022)15 conducted an observational, retrospective, multicentric real-world study analyzing data from 116 patients with TRD (REAL-ESK study).
Hypertension was reported in 10.3% of patients treated with SPRAVATO.
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; BP, blood pressure; SAE, serious adverse event; SMQ, Standardized Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Query; TRD, treatment-resistant depression.

POSTMARKETING SAFETY DATA

REMS Database

Safety data of interest were gathered from REMS patient enrollment and monitoring forms completed by certified US healthcare settings and pharmacies from 5 March 2019, to 5 January 2024. Of the 58,483 patients who received at least 1 SPRAVATO treatment session, 44,908 patients (76.8%) reported ≥1 AE of special interest. Increased BP (defined as a BP increase at 40 min after administration of ≥20 mmHg or a value ≥180 mmHg for systolic, or ≥15 mmHg or a value of ≥105 mmHg for diastolic, compared with values prior to administration) was reported in 6,818 patients (11.7%) and in 13,510/1,486,213 (0.9%) treatment sessions.16 

The rate of increased BP dropped from 1.6% during the first session to below 1% by the end of the induction phase. An increased proportion of males vs females (13.4% vs 10.6%) experienced increased BP. Increased BP was also more common in patients aged 25-55 years and those aged >55 years (11.7% and 12.9%, respectively) vs patients aged <25 years (6.8%). Of the 2096 AEs reported to be serious (i.e., led to death, disability or permanent damage, hospitalization, a life-threatening event, or any event that may jeopardize the patient or require intervention to prevent the above outcomes), 6.8% were due to increased BP.16

FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)

An analysis was conducted using the FAERS database (first quarter of 2004 to second quarter of 2023) to evaluate gender-based differences in adverse drug events (ADEs) of esketamine and ketamine.17 For increased BP, there were 211 cases (reporting odds ratio [ROR], 6.89). For hypertension, there were 237 cases (ROR, 6.21). Note that ROR >1 represents a safety signal. Men were more likely than women to report hypertension as an ADE.18  

The authors noted that confounding factors that may have affected results include age, gender, concomitant treatments, underlying conditions, and lifestyle. In addition, there may have been duplicate reports and inaccurate or incomplete data (e.g., medical history).17,35 Although most reports were from the US, not all were reported within the US. The analysis was not limited to esketamine nasal spray and could have included other formulations of esketamine.17

Management of High BP

In the TRD clinical studies, unless clinically indicated, it was recommended that transient increases in BP not be treated, as the BP typically returns to predose values within 2 hours following SPRAVATO administration. The effect of any treatment may result in hypotension.12

Across 6 completed TRD studies, 2.2% (2/93) events in the SPRAVATO+oral AD group and 0% (0/2) events in the oral AD+PBO group in the DB short-term studies and 2.4% (8/330) events in patients who received SPRAVATO in the long-term open-label study had increased BP that required rescue medication. New antihypertensive medications initiated in DB short-term studies in SPRAVATO-treated patients without a history of hypertension (2.1%; n=6/280) included amlodipine, captopril, losartan, metoprolol, propranolol, hydrochlorothiazide, and prazosin.7

In a post hoc analysis of patients with MDSI (pooled data from the ASPIRE I and ASPIRE II trials; see details from Fua et al [2020]), 3 patients from the SPRAVATO+SOC group received a single dose of captopril in response to a hypertensive AE.30

Hauser et al (2024)36 conducted a retrospective observational study in 37 patients with TRD to evaluate the effect of music on AEs (including increased BP) during treatment with intranasal racemic ketamine (n=31) or SPRAVATO (n=6). Multivariate comparisons between the music-listening and non-music-listening treatment sessions found significantly lower maximum systolic BP in the music-listening group (music-listening group, 138 mmHg; non-music-listening group, 140 mmHg; P=0.017).

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, DERWENT Drug File and/or other resources, including internal/external databases, pertaining to this topic was conducted on 14 March 2025.

This response excludes studies in which <50 patients received SPRAVATO.

References

1 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Non-Clinical Review. NDA 211243 - SPRAVATO (esketamine) - Reference ID: 4397715. 2019- [cited 2025 March 31]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2019/211243Orig1s000PharmR.pdf
2 Data on File. Esketamine. Internal Communication.  
3 Haas DA, Harper DG. Ketamine: a review of its pharmacologic properties and use in ambulatory anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 1992;39(3):61-68.  
4 Johnstone M. The cardiovascular effects of ketamine in man. Anaesthesia. 1976;31(7):873-882.  
5 Liebe T, Li S, Lord A, et al. Factors influencing the cardiovascular response to subanesthetic ketamine: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20(11):909-918.  
6 Suleiman Z, Kolawole I, Bolaji B. Evaluation of the cardiovascular stimulation effects after induction of anaesthesia with ketamine. J West Afr Coll Surg. 2012;2(1):38-52.  
7 Doherty T, Wajs E, Melkote R, et al. Cardiac safety of esketamine nasal spray in treatment-resistant depression: results from the clinical development program. CNS Drugs. 2020;34(3):299-310.  
8 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Summary Review. NDA 211243 - SPRAVATO (esketamine) - Reference ID: 4398871. 2019- [cited 2025 March 31]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2019/211243Orig1s000SumR.pdf
9 Popova V, Daly EJ, Trivedi M, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray combined with a newly initiated oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: a randomized double-blind active-controlled study. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176(6):428-438.  
10 Williamson DJ, Gogate JP, Sliwa JK, et al. Longitudinal course of adverse events with esketamine nasal spray: a post hoc analysis of pooled data from phase 3 trials in patients with treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2022;83(6):21m14318.  
11 Ochs-Ross R, Wajs E, Daly EJ, et al. Comparison of long-term efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant in younger versus older patients with treatment-resistant depression: post-hoc analysis of SUSTAIN-2, a long-term open-label phase 3 safety and efficacy study. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2022;30(5):541-556.  
12 Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Protocol ESKETINTRD3003; Phase 3 Amendment 4: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled study of intranasal esketamine plus an oral antidepressant for relapse prevention in treatment-resistant depression. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(9):893-903.  
13 Ionescu DF, Fu DJ, Qiu X, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for rapid reduction of depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicide ideation with intent: results of a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study (ASPIRE II). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;24(1):22-31.  
14 Samalin L, Mekaoui L, Rothärmel M, et al. Use of esketamine nasal spray in patients with treatment-resistant depression in routine practice: a real-world French study. Dépress Anxiety. 2024;(1):7262794.  
15 Martinotti G, Vita A, Fagiolini A, et al. Real-world experience of esketamine use to manage treatment-resistant depression: a multicentric study on safety and effectiveness (REAL-ESK study). J Affect Disord. 2022;319:646-654.  
16 Ahmed M, Himedan M, Cabrera P, et al. Real-world safety profile of esketamine nasal spray: an analysis of the risk evaluation and mitigation strategy program approximately 5 years after approval in the United States. Poster presented at: Psych Congress; October 29-November 2, 2024; Boston, MA.  
17 Yang X, Chen D. Comparing the adverse effects of ketamine and esketamine between genders using FAERS data. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1329436.  
18 Yang X, Chen D. Supplement to: Comparing the adverse effects of ketamine and esketamine between genders using FAERS data. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1329436.  
19 Data on File. Esketamine. Core Company Data Sheet. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-ERI-122750672. V12; 2024.  
20 Daly EJ, Trivedi MH, Janik A, et al. Efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant treatment for relapse prevention in patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76(9):893-903.  
21 Wajs E, Aluisio L, Holder R, et al. Esketamine nasal spray plus oral antidepressant in patients with treatment-resistant depression: assessment of long-term safety in a phase 3, open-label study (SUSTAIN-2). J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(3):19m12891.  
22 Fedgchin M, Trivedi M, Daly EJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of fixed-dose esketamine nasal spray combined with a new oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression: results of a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study (TRANSFORM-1). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2019;22(10):616-630.  
23 Ochs-Ross R, Daly EJ, Zhang Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant in elderly patients with treatment-resistant depression-TRANSFORM-3. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;28(2):121-141.  
24 Daly EJ, Singh JB, Fedgchin M, et al. Efficacy and safety of intranasal esketamine adjunctive to oral antidepressant therapy in treatment-resistant depression: results of a double-blind, doubly-randomized, placebo-controlled study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018;75(2):139-148.  
25 Fu DJ, Ionescu DF, Li X, et al. Esketamine nasal spray for rapid reduction of major depressive disorder symptoms in patients who have active suicidal ideation with intent: double-blind, randomized study (ASPIRE I). J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(3):19m13191.  
26 Chen X, Hou X, Bai D, et al. Efficacy and safety of flexibly dosed esketamine nasal spray plus a newly initiated oral antidepressant in adult patients with treatment-resistant depression: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, active-controlled study conducted in China and USA. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023;19:693-707.  
27 Zaki N, Chen LN, Lane R, et al. Long-term safety and maintenance of response with esketamine nasal spray in treatment-resistant depression: final results of the SUSTAIN-3 study. Poster presented at: Psych Congress; September 6-10, 2023; Nashville, TN.  
28 Data on File. Esketamine. Core Company Data Sheet. Janssen Research & Development, LLC. EDMS-ERI-122750672; 2020.  
29 Fua S, Gogate J, Starr HL, et al. The relationship between adverse event reporting and events identified by scales/vital sign measurement with esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression (SUSTAIN-2 Study). Poster presented at: The International Society for CNS Clinical Trials Methodology (ISCTM); February 19-21, 2019; Washington, DC.  
30 Fua S, Turkoz I, Nash A, et al. Incidence and outcomes of severe safety events of interest occurring with esketamine nasal spray in conjunction with standard of care antidepressant therapy in patients with major depressive disorder who have active suicidal ideation with intent. Poster presented at: American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA) 34th Annual Conference; September 30 - October 4, 2020; Virtual Meeting.  
31 McIntyre RS, Bitter I, Buyze J. Safety and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release in patients with treatment resistant depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024;85:58-65.  
32 Reif A, Bitter I, Buyze J, et al. Esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine for treatment-resistant depression. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(14):1298-1309.  
33 McIntyre RS, Bitter I, Buyze J. Supplement to: Safety and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray versus quetiapine extended release in patients with treatment resistant depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024;85:58-65.  
34 Chepke C, Shelton R, Sanacora G, et al. Real-world safety of esketamine nasal spray: a comprehensive analysis of esketamine and respiratory depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2024;27(12):pyae058.  
35 FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Public Dashboard. Accessed 2025 March 31. Available via: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/fdas-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers/fda-adverse-event-reporting-system-faers-public-dashboard
36 Hauser J, Sarlon J, Liwinski T, et al. Listening to music during intranasal (es)ketamine therapy in patients with treatment-resistant depression correlates with better tolerability and reduced anxiety. Front Psychiatry. 2024;15:1327598.