This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

PREZCOBIX - Safety Information - Effect on Lipids

Last Updated: 08/07/2026

Summary

  • In the GS-US-216-0130 study, no clinically relevant changes from baseline through week 48 in median fasting total cholesterol (TC), median fasting low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), median fasting high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), median fasting triglycerides (TG), or median fasting TC to HDL ratio were observed in patients who received darunavir (DRV) and cobicistat (COBI).1-3
  • A study conducted in virologically suppressed patients who were receiving a stable regimen containing darunavir (DRV)/ritonavir (r) and were then switched from ritonavir to COBI found that COBI had a beneficial effect on TG levels in all patients. Statistically significant changes in all lipid parameters were observed in patients with baseline hypercholesterolemia.4
  • In the AMBER study, which compared PREZCOBIX + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) with the single-tablet regimen (STR) DRV/COBI/FTC/tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), there was a statistically significant increase in all lipid parameters from baseline to week 48. Lipid-lowering drugs were started by 6 (1.7%) patients in the STR arm and 2 (0.6%) patients in the PREZCOBIX arm by week 48, and 14 (4%) patients in the STR arm vs. 3 (1%) patients in the PREZCOBIX arm by week 96.5,6
  • In the GS-US-299-0102 study, there were greater increases in fasting lipid parameters in the STR (DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF) group compared with the DRV + COBI + FTC/TDF group at week 48.7
  • In the EMERALD study, lipid-lowering drugs were started by 20/763 (3%) patients in the STR (DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF) arm vs. 7/378 (2%) patients in the boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) + FTC/TDF arm by week 48, and by 59/763 (8%) patients in the STR arm vs. 19/352 (5%) patients in the control arm by week 96.8,9

clinical Studies

GS-US-216-0130 Study

GS-US-216-0130 is a phase 3b, open-label, single arm, 48 week, multicenter US study evaluating the safety, tolerability, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of DRV 800 mg + COBI 150 mg once daily (QD; administered as single agents) in combination with 2 fully active nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced (no DRV RAMs) HIV-1-infected patients (N=313; n=295 treatment-naïve).1

Lipid Evaluations

Week 24-Lipids

  • Through week 24, 4 patients (1.3%) each experienced hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia, and 3 patients (1.0%) experienced increased blood TG.2
    • All but 1 of these patients (hypertriglyceridemia) were treatment-naïve.
    • A total of 3 patients experienced grade 3 hypercholesterolemia, and a total of 4 patients experienced a grade 3 increase in TG. All of these patients were treatment-naïve.
    • No subject experienced a serious adverse event (AE) associated with a clinical laboratory abnormality, and no subject discontinued with study drugs or the study due to an AE associated with a clinical laboratory abnormality.
  • There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline through week 24 observed in either the treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced cohorts for median fasting TC, median fasting LDL, median fasting HDL, median fasting TG, or median fasting TC to HDL ratio.2
  • There were no apparent relationships observed between DRV area under the concentration-time curve during a 24-hour interval (AUC24h) and worst toxicity grade in TC, LDL, HDL, or TG through week 24.2
    • Higher DRV AUC24h and trough plasma concentrations (C0h) were observed in patients with grade 3 cholesterol changes. This analysis was limited by a small sample size (n=4).

Week 48-Lipids

  • There were no clinically relevant changes from baseline in median lipid parameters through week 48.1

Lipid Parameters at Baseline, Week 24, and Week 483
Parameter, mg/dL
Treatment-naïve patients
Treatment-experienced patients
All patients
N
Median
Range
N
Median
Range
N
Median
Range
TG
   Baseline
290
95
35-1252
18
124
56-1378
308
97
35-1378
   Week 24
259
117
28-790
16
151
55-918
275
120
28-918
   Week 48
244
115
41-780
15
133
59-643
259
116
41-780
TC
   Baseline
290
159
70-290
18
160
76-454
308
159
70-454
   Week 24
260
175
89-317
16
190
46-302
276
175
46-317
   Week 48
244
176
87-291
15
180
61-283
259
176
61-291
LDL
   Baseline
291
103
31-224
18
99
46-177
309
102
31-224
   Week 24
260
111
39-235
16
109
13-206
276
111
13-235
   Week 48
245
112
41-233
15
116
29-196
260
112
29-233
HDL
   Baseline
290
43
19-122
18
42
15-60
308
43
15-122
   Week 24
261
45
10-97
16
46
14-68
277
45
10-97
   Week 48
243
44
20-93
15
43
17-54
258
44
17-93
Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Echeverria Study

Echeverria et al (2017)4 evaluated changes in lipid parameters and the percentage of subjects with dyslipidemia in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected patients who were receiving a stable regimen containing DRV/r (monotherapy, dual therapy, or triple therapy for ≥6 months) and were then switched from ritonavir to COBI (N=299).

Study Design/Methods

  • Retrospective observational study.
  • Lipid parameters at baseline before the switch and 24 weeks after the switch were compared.
  • Patients were stratified according to the presence of hypercholesterolemia (taking lipid-lowering drugs or baseline TC >200 mg/dL and/or LDL >130 mg/dL) or hypertriglyceridemia (baseline TG levels >200 mg/dL).

Results

Baseline Characteristics
  • Epidemiological, clinical, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related characteristics are summarized in Table: Baseline Characteristics.
  • Fifty-two percent of patients had dyslipidemia (hypercholesterolemia and/or hypertriglyceridemia) at baseline; of these, 52% were on monotherapy, 61% were on dual therapy, and 70% were on triple therapy.

Baseline Characteristics4
N=299
Age (years), median (IQR)
49 (42, 54)
Gender (male) (%)
85
HCV coinfection (%)
6
HBV coinfection (%)
2
Cumulative exposure to ARV therapy (years), median (IQR)
12 (6, 20)
Cumulative exposure to protease inhibitors (years), median (IQR)
7.5 (4, 14)
Current CD4+ count (cells/mm3), median (IQR)
646 (448, 847)
CD4+ count <200 cells/µL (%)
5.4
VL ≤50 copies/mL (%)
100
ARV treatment (%)
   DRV/r monotherapy
49.5
   DRV/r dual therapy
9
   DRV/r triple therapy
41.5
   Receiving TDF
26
Abbreviations: ARV, antiretroviral; DRV, darunavir; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IQR, interquartile range; r, ritonavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; VL, viral load.
Lipid Evaluations
  • Changes in lipid parameters are detailed in Table: Changes in Lipid Parameters at Week 24.
  • In the study population as a whole or in the subset with baseline hypertriglyceridemia, only TG decreased significantly from baseline; significant changes in other lipids were not observed.
  • In the subset with baseline hypercholesterolemia, changes from baseline to week 24 were significant for all lipid parameters.

Changes in Lipid Parameters at Week 244
Lipid Parameter
Baseline (N=299)
Week 24 after change
P-value
Use of lipid-lowering agents (%)
12
12
-
   TC (mg/dL), median (IQR)
190 (162, 216)
184 (154, 211)
0.085
   LDL (mg/dL), median (IQR)
111 (92, 136)
109 (84, 132)
0.530
   HDL (mg/dL), (median [IQR])
44 (38, 54)
45 (38, 54)
0.440
   TG (mg/dL), median (IQR)
167 (93, 187)
124 (87, 175)
0.018
Subjects with hypercholesterolemia at baseline (TC >200 mg/dL and/or LDL >130 mg/dL) (n=124)
   TC (mg/dL), median (IQR)
231 (209, 243)
212 (189, 239)
0.001
   LDL (mg/dL), median (IQR)
144 (131, 161)
131 (113, 152)
0.047
   HDL (mg/dL), median (IQR)
45 (40, 54)
52 (44, 59)
0.002
   TG (mg/dL), median (IQR)
157 (109, 209)
131 (101, 202)
0.025
Subjects with TG >200 mg/dL at baseline (n=64)
   TC (mg/dL), median (IQR)
207 (182, 232)
191 (158, 215)
0.067
   LDL (mg/dL), (median (IQR)
109 (84, 121)
105 (83, 127)
0.299
   HDL (mg/dL), median (IQR)
40 (36, 45)
40 (36, 48)
0.381
   TG (mg/dL), median (IQR)
352 (223, 389)
229 (131, 279)
<0.001
Abbreviations: HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IQR, interquartile range; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.

Data from Studies with drv/cobi/ftc/taf Str

AMBER

The AMBER study is a phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, double-blind study to evaluate efficacy and safety of the STR DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF vs. the fixed-dose combination PREZCOBIX co-administered with FTC/TDF in antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adults (N=725).5

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were stratified by screening viral load (VL;</≥100,000) and by screening CD4+ cell counts (</≥200 cells/mm3) and then randomized to receive the STR (DRV 800 mg, COBI 150 mg, FTC 200 mg, and TAF 10 mg) with matching PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF placebo or the active-control regimen of PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF with a matching STR placebo.
  • After database lock and unblinding for the week 48 analysis, patients randomized to the STR continued on open-label DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF and patients randomized to the PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF control arm were switched to DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF in the extension phase until week 96.

Results – Week 48


Median (IQR) Change from Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Week 485
Assessment
DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF
(N=362)

PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF
(N=363)

P-value
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
+28.6 (+12.8 to 47.2)
+10.4 (-8.0 to 29.8)
<0.0001
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
+4.3 (-1.2 to 12.0)
+1.5 (-3.9 to 8.1)
<0.0001
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
+17.4 (+2.9 to 32.9)
+5.0 (-10.8 to 19.0)
<0.0001
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
+23.9 (-3.0 to 58.5)
+14.2 (-12.0 to 40.7)
0.001
Total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio
+0.20 (-0.28 to 0.67)
+0.08 (-0.41 to 0.53)
0.036
Abbreviations: COBI, cobicistat; DRV, darunavir; FTC, emtricitabine; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IQR, interquartile range; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Results – Week 96

  • In the initial STR arm, there were statistically significant increases from baseline to week 96 in fasting total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol/HDL-cholesterol ratio (P<0.001 for within treatment arm changes).6
  • Grade 3 or 4 fasting LDL-cholesterol (≥190 mg/dL [4.90 mol/L]) occurred in 9% (30/346) of patients in the STR arm from baseline-week 96 and 4% (11/295) of patients in the PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF arm after switch to the STR.
  • Fasting lipid parameters are shown in Table: Fasting Lipids.
  • Lipid-lowering drugs were started by 14 (4%) patients by week 96 in the STR arm and 3 (1%) of patients in the PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF arm after switch to the STR.

Fasting Lipids6
Median Value
Baseline
Week 48
Week 96
DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF
PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF
DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF
PREZCOBIX + FTC/TDF
DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF
Total cholesterol (mg/dL)
163
162
196
172
200a
LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
96
97
116
101
123a
HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)
42
42
48
44
47a
Triglycerides (mg/dL)
97
95
123
112
130a
Total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio
3.8
3.8
4.0
3.9
4.2a
Abbreviations: COBI, cobicistat; DRV, darunavir; FTC, emtricitabine; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
aP<0.001 for within treatment arm changes at week 96 from baseline (Wilcoxon signed-rank test).

GS-US-299-0102

In the GS-US-299-0102 study, the efficacy and safety of the DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF STR was compared to that of DRV + COBI (administered as single agents) + FTC/TDF in HIV-1 infected, treatment-naïve patients (N=153).7

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were stratified by baseline VL (≤100,000 and >100,000) and race (black and non-black) and randomized 2:1 to receive the STR (DRV 800 mg, COBI 150 mg, FTC 200 mg, and TAF 10 mg; TAF group) or a regimen consisting of DRV 400 mg x 2 + COBI 150 mg + FTC/TDF 200/300 mg tablets (TDF group).

Results

  • There were greater increases in fasting lipid parameters in the TAF group compared with the TDF group at week 48 (Table: Median Change from Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Week 48).
  • The majority of reported lipid-related adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were nonserious and mild in severity.
  • There were no differences in the number of patients who were initiated on lipid-lowering medications during the study (TAF, 7 [6.8%] vs. TDF, 4 [8%], P=0.75).

Median Change from Baseline in Fasting Lipids at Week 487
Assessment
DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF
(N=103)

DRV + COBI + FTC/TDF
(N=50)

P-value
Total cholesterol, mg/dL
40
5
<0.001
LDL, mg/dL
26
4
<0.001
HDL, mg/dL
7
3
0.009
Total cholesterol:HDL ratio
0.0
-0.2
0.15
Triglycerides
29
-5
0.007
Abbreviations: COBI, cobicistat; DRV, darunavir; FTC, emtricitabine; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

EMERALD

The EMERALD study is a phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of switching to the DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF STR vs. continuing the current regimen consisting of a bPI combined with FTC/TDF in virologically-suppressed, HIV-1-infected adults (N=1141).8

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were stratified according to PI (DRV/r or PREZCOBIX QD, atazanavir [ATV]/r or ATV/COBI QD, or lopinavir [LPV]/r BID) and then randomized 2:1 to switch to the STR (DRV 800 mg, COBI 150 mg, FTC 200 mg, and TAF 10 mg) or to continue their bPI regimen.
  • After week 48, patients randomized to the STR continued on DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF and patients randomized to the bPI arm were switched to DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF in the extension phase until week 96.9

Results- Week 48

  • Median changes from baseline to week 48 (STR vs. bPI + FTC/TDF):8
    • Fasting total cholesterol: 19.7 mg/dL vs. 1.3 mg/dL (P<0.0001)
    • LDL-cholesterol: 15.7 mg/dL vs. 1.9 mg/dL (P<0.0001)
    • Ratio of total cholesterol to HDL-cholesterol: 0.2 vs. 0.1 (P=0.010)
  • During treatment, lipid-lowering drugs were started by 20/763 (3%) patients in the STR arm vs. 7/378 (2%) patients in the bPI arm (P=0.54).

Treatment-Emergent Grade 3-4 Laboratory AEs (≥3% in Either Arm)8
Parameter, n (%)
DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF
(N=763)

bPI + FTC/TDF
(N=378)

Fasting LDL (≥4.90 mol/L; 190 mg/dL)
48 (7)
6 (2)
Fasting total cholesterol (≥7.77 mol/L; ≥300 mg/dL)
28 (4)
5 (1)
Abbreviations: AEs, adverse events; bPI, boosted protease inhibitor; COBI, cobicistat; DRV, darunavir; FTC, emtricitabine; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.

Results – Week 969


Most Common Treatment-Emergent Grade 3 or 4 Laboratory Abnormalities (>5% Either Arm)9
Initial DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF Arm
Late Switch Arm
STR
(BL-week 48)
(N=763)

STR
(week 48-week 96)
(N=728)

STR
(BL-week 96)
(N=763)

bPI + FTC/TDF
(BL-week 52)

(N=378)
STRa
(week 52-week 96)
(N=352)

Fasting LDL
(≥4.90 mol/L; ≥190 mg/dL)
47/737 (6)
38/688 (6)
67/741 (9)
6/364 (2)
9/328 (3)
Fasting total cholesterol
(≥7.77 mol/L; ≥300 mg/dL)
27/737 (4)
16/692 (2)
36/741 (5)
5/364 (1)
6/330 (2)
Abbreviations: BL, baseline; bPI, boosted protease inhibitor; COBI, cobicistat; DRV, darunavir; FTC, emtricitabine; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; ND, not determined; STR, single-tablet regimen of DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate.
aComprising 44 weeks of DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF exposure (ie, from the switch to the STR at week 52).


Median (IQR) Change in Fasting Lipids9
Initial DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF Arm
Late Switch Arm
STR
(BL-week 48)
(N=763)

STR
(BL-week 96)
(N=763)

P-valuea,b
bPI + FTC/TDF
(BL-week 52)
(N=378)
STRc
(week 52-96)
(N=352)

P-valuea,b
TC, mg/dL
+19.9
(1.2; 39.4)

+22.0
(0.4; 44.0)

<0.001
+1.3
(-12.0; 20.0)

+22.0
(3.0; 42.7)

<0.001
HDL, mg/dL
+2.7
(-3.0; 8.0)

+3.0
(-2.0; 8.5)

<0.001
0.0
(-4.6; 4.0)

+3.3
(-2.0; 8.0)

<0.001
LDL, mg/dL
+15.9
(0.0; 32.0)

+17.0
(-3.0; 35.2)

<0.001
+1.9
(-12.0; 17.0)

+15.0
(0.0; 32.9)

<0.001
TG, mg/dL
+5.7
(-21.0; 39.0)

+7.0
(-25.0; 43.0)

<0.001
+4.9
(-23.0; 39.0)

+8.0
(-25.8; 47.0)

0.004
TC:HDL ratio
+0.20
(-0.20; 0.60)

+0.20
(-0.40; 0.70)

<0.001
+0.10
(-0.30; 0.40)

+0.20
(-0.30; 0.70)

<0.001
Abbreviations: BL, baseline; bPI, boosted protease inhibitor; COBI, cobicistat; DRV, darunavir; FTC, emtricitabine; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; IQR, interquartile range; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; STR, single-tablet regimen of DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF; TAF, tenofovir alafenamide; TC, total cholesterol; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; TG, triglycerides.
aWithin treatment arm comparisons for change at week 96 from reference assessed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
bReference for the initial STR arm is study baseline and for the late switchers is the last value before the switch.
cComprising 44 weeks of DRV/COBI/FTC/TAF exposure (ie, from the switch to the STR at week 52).

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 28 March 2025. Company-sponsored studies and studies specifically evaluating DRV/COBI and effect on lipid parameters were included.

References

1 Tashima K, Crofoot G, Tomaka FL, et al. Cobicistat-boosted darunavir in HIV-1-infected adults: week 48 results of a phase IIIb, open-label single-arm trial. AIDS Res Ther. 2014;11:39.  
2 Data on File. GS-US-216-0130 Week 24 Clinical Research Report. Gilead Sciences, Inc; 2012.  
3 Data on File. GS-US-216-0130-W48-SAF-LAB-Additional. Gilead Sciences, Inc; 2013.  
4 Echeverría P, Bonjoch A, Puig J, et al. Significant improvement in triglyceride levels after switching from ritonavir to cobicistat in suppressed HIV‐1‐infected subjects with dyslipidaemia. HIV Med. 2017;18(10):782-786.  
5 Eron JJ, Orkin C, Gallant J, et al. A week-48 randomized phase-3 trial of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive HIV-1 patients. AIDS. 2018;32(11):1431-1442.  
6 Orkin C, Eron JJ, Rockstroh J, et al. Week 96 results of a phase 3 trial of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide in treatment-naive HIV-1 patients. AIDS. 2020;34(5):707-718.  
7 Mills A, Crofoot G Jr, McDonald C, et al. Tenofovir alafenamide versus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the first protease inhibitor–based single-tablet regimen for initial HIV-1 therapy: a randomized phase 2 study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2015;69(4):439-445.  
8 Orkin C, Molina JM, Negredo E, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted protease inhibitors plus emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimens to single-tablet darunavir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide at 48 weeks in adults with virologically suppressed HIV-1 (EMERALD): a phase 3, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(1):e23-e34.  
9 Eron JJ, Orkin C, Cunningham D, et al. Week 96 efficacy and safety results of the phase 3, randomized EMERALD trial to evaluate switching from boosted-protease inhibitors plus emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate regimens to the once daily, single-tablet regimen of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (D/C/F/TAF) in treatment-experienced, virologically-suppressed adults living with HIV-1. Antiviral Res. 2019;170:104543.  

Would you like to clear and leave your conversation? Message history will be lost.