This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

nipocalimab

Medical Information

Nipocalimab - Concomitant Use with Vaccines

Last Updated: 04/08/2025

SUMMARY  

  • Nipocalimab is an investigational, fully human, high-affinity, aglycosylated, effectorless immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) anti-neonatal fragment crystallizable receptor (FcRn) monoclonal antibody thereby reducing levels of circulating immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies.1-5 
  • In a randomized, open-label, parallel, single-site, interventional study, the effect of nipocalimab on IgG response to T-cell–dependent/independent vaccines (tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis vaccine [Tdap]; pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine [PPSV®23], respectively) was evaluated in healthy adult patients.6 
  • In a post-hoc analysis, nipocalimab was assessed for the impact on pre-existing clinically relevant anti-vaccine antibodies and antibody response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination and infection.7 

Clinical Data

Randomized, Open-label Study

Cossu et al (2024)6 evaluated the effect of nipocalimab on IgG response to T-cell-dependent/independent Tdap and PPSV®23 vaccines in healthy adult patients.

Study Design 

  • Healthy patients (≥18 years of age) were randomized (1:1) to receive either nipocalimab (active arm) or no drug (control arm). (See Figure: Phase 1 Vaccine Challenge Study in Healthy Volunteers).6 
    • The target population consisted of healthy male and female patients, 18 to 65 years of age, with no history of receiving a tetanus (eg, Tdap, Td) vaccine in the past ≤5 years or a pneumococcal vaccine (eg, Prevnar 7, 13, and 20 or PPSV®23) in the past ≤10 years.
    • This study assessed the following: total IgG median percentage from baseline, proportion of patients with positive IgG response to tetanus vaccine, change in anti-tetanus (anti-TT) and anti-pneumococcal (anti-PCP) IgG levels over time, and serotype-specific anti-PCP IgG response.

Phase 1 Vaccine Challenge Study in Healthy Volunteers6 

A diagram of a vaccine

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; anti-TT, anti-tetanus; IgG, immunoglobulin G; IV, intravenous; PPSV®23, 23-polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine; q2w, every 2 weeks; R, randomization; Tdap, tetanus toxoid, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

aPositive anti-TT response was defined as a patient with a pre-vaccination anti-TT IgG <0.16 IU/mL and a post-vaccination anti-TT IgG ≥0.16 IU/mL or a pre-vaccination anti-TT IgG ≥0.16 IU/mL and a ≥2-fold increase from baseline in post-vaccination anti-TT IgG titers at week 4.

Results 

  • The demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable across treatment groups.6 
  • Overall, 32 healthy patients (active arm, n=17; control arm, n=15) were randomized into the study. In the vaccine response completers analysis, 29 patients were included (active arm, n=15; control arm, n=14) (see Figure: Reduction of Total IgG [Completers Analysis Set]).6 
  • The time from previous tetanus toxoid, diptheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) booster was 8 years (range, 5-16) in the control arm (n=15) compared to 9 years (range, 5-13) in the active arm (n=17).6   
Pharmacodynamics – total IgG
  • The observed median pre-dose (minimal) reduction in total IgG at week 4 was 65.9% in the active arm compared to an observed median increase of 8.2% in the control arm.6 
    • Total IgG returned to baseline level by week 16 in the control arm.

Reduction of Total IgG (Completers Analysis Set)6 

A graph of a line

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; IQR, interquartile range; PPSV®23, 23-polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine; Tdap, tetanus toxoid, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine.

Anti-Vaccine Antibody Responses
  • All patients showed a response to the Tdap Vaccine (see Figure: Response to T-cell-Dependent [Tdap] Vaccine [Completers Analysis Set]).6 
  • The proportion of patients who met criteria of positive anti-TT IgG response at week 2 and week 16 was similar in both groups:6 
    • Week 2: control arm (71.4%) and active arm(60%)
    • Week 16: control arm (28.6%, 4/14) and active arm (40%, 6/15)

Response to T-cell-Dependent (Tdap) Vaccine (Completers Analysis Set)6 

A graph of a patient's blood pressure

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; IQR, interquartile range; PPSV®23, 23-polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine; SE, standard error; Tdap, tetanus toxoid, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine; TT, tetanus.

Response to T-cell-Independent (PPSV®23) Vaccine (Completers Analysis Set)6 

A graph of a number of patients

Description automatically generated with medium confidence

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; IQR, interquartile range; PCP, pneumococcal; PPSV®23, 23-polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine; SE, standard error; Tdap, tetanus toxoid, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine.

Serotype-specific Anti-PCP IgG Response

Serotype-Specific Anti-PCP IgG Response (Completers analysis Set)6

A graph of red and grey squares

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; ns, not significant; PPSV®23, 23-polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine; Tdap, tetanus toxoid, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis vaccine.

aNormal response is defined as 70% of the serotypes with protective levels >1.3 mg/mL and a ≥2-fold increase in antibody levels.

b70% is defined as 16 out of 23 analysed serotypes.

Post-hoc Analysis

Yu et al (2024)7 conducted a post-hoc analysis to assess the impact of nipocalimab on pre-existing clinically relevant anti-vaccine antibodies and antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection.

Study Design

  • IRIS-RA is a phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, that investigated the efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of nipocalimab in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate response or intolerance to ≥1 antitumor necrosis factor agent.8 
    • Patients (≥18 years of age) were randomized 3:2 to receive either nipocalimab
    • 15 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks or a placebo IV every 2 weeks from weeks 0 to 10 (see Figure: IRIS-RA study).7 
    • The study included a screening period, a double-blind treatment period (weeks 0–12) and a safety/PD follow-up period (weeks 12–18).8 
    • The goal of the post-hoc analysis was to assess the impact of nipocalimab on pre-existing clinically relevant anti-vaccine antibodies and antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection.7 
    • The nipocalimab treatment significantly and reversibly reduced total IgG levels in patients with RA (see Figure: Observed Pre-dose (Minimal) Reduction
      in Total IgG in Patients with RA
      ).7 
      • Based on PK/PD modeling based simulations for nipocalimab 15 mg/kg IV administered every 2 weeks, median steady-state IgG reduction was predicted to be a maximum of 75% with a pre-dose (trough) of 64.5%. 

IRIS-RA Study7 

A screenshot of a medical test

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: IV, intravenously; n, number of patients; R, randomization; RA, rheumatoid arthritis.

Observed Pre-Dose (minimal) Reduction in Total IgG in Patients with RA7 

A graph with red line and numbers

Description automatically generated

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; IQR, interquartile range; RA, rheumatoid arthritis

Results 

  • Nipocalimab-treated patients were able to mount IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.7 
    • Patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during nipocalimab treatment mounted IgG responses against spike protein S1 receptor-binding domain (S1 RBD), and nucleocapsid.
    • Four patients developed SARS-CoV-2 infections during the study (see Figure: Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection).
    • Of the 4 patients with RA who developed SARS-CoV-2 infections during the study, 3 had mild infections, and 1 had a moderate infection. All resolved without complications.

Response to SARS-CoV-2 Infection7 

    • A collage of graphs and charts

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Abbreviations: AU, arbitrary unit; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; IgG, immunoglobulin G; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; S1 RBD, spike protein S1 receptor‐binding domain; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

  • Patients treated with nipocalimab were able to mount IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.7 
    • Clinical experience in COVID-19 suggests that antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infection are variable in magnitude and duration.
    • Two patients with RA who received SARS-CoV-2 vaccination during nipocalimab treatment elicited IgG responses against spike protein and S1 RBD only (see Figure: Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination).
    • There were no SARS-CoV-2 infection reported for these patients.

Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination7 

    • A graph of vaccination

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Abbreviations: AU, arbitrary unit; COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; IgG, immunoglobulin G; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; S1 RBD, spike protein S1 receptor‐binding domain; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

Literature Search

A literature search of Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 16 December 2024.

 

References

1 Ling LE, Hillson JL, Tiessen RG, et al. M281, an anti‐FcRn antibody: pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety across the full range of IgG reduction in a first‐in‐human study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(4):1031-1039.  
2 Patel DD, Bussel JB. Neonatal Fc receptor in human immunity: function and role in therapeutic intervention. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;146(3):467-478.  
3 Seth N, Xu R, Tyler S, et al. Nipocalimab, a high-affinity, immunoselective clinical FcRn blocker with unique properties: observations from nonclinical and clinical studies. Poster presented at: 76th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology; April 13-18, 2024; Denver, CO, and Virtual.  
4 Antozzi C, Guptill J, Bril V, et al. Safety and efficacy of nipocalimab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: results from the randomized phase 2 VIVACITY-MG study. Neurology. 2024;102(2):e207937.  
5 Ling LE, Tyler S, Beneduce CJ, et al. Nipocalimab’s selective targeting of FcRn and IgG clearance preserves key immune functions. Oral Presentation presented at: American Academy of Neurology Annual Meeting; April 24-26, 2022; Virtual Meeting.  
6 Cossu M, Mendez CB, Jackson A, et al. A randomized, open-label study on the effect of nipocalimab on vaccine responses in healthy participants. presented at: American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine; October 15-18,2024; Savannah, Georgia.  
7 Yu F, Myshkin E, Mendez CB, et al. Post-hoc analysis of clinically relevant anti-vaccine antibodies in participants treated with nipocalimab. presented at: American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine; October 15, 2024; Savannah, GA.  
8 Taylor PC, Schett G, Huizinga TW, et al. Nipocalimab, an anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody, in participants with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNF therapy: results from the phase 2a IRIS-RA study. RMD Open. 2024;10(2):19.