J&J Medical Connect
INLEXZO™

(gemcitabine intravesical system)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

INLEXZO - Pharmacokinetics

Last Updated: 04/08/2026

SUMMARY

  • INLEXZO (gemcitabine intravesical system) is an intravesical drug releasing system (iDRS), referred to as gem-iDRS and TAR-200 in literature.1 
  • Please refer to the full Prescribing Information for INLEXZO for information regarding pharmacokinetics under CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY.2
  • van Valenberg et al (2024)3 evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor effect of INLEXZO in patients with recurrent intermediate-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in a phase 1b study (N=12).
    • Plasma gemcitabine concentrations remained below the detection level; 2´deoxy2´,2´difluorouridine (dFdU) concentration ranged between 0.101 and 0.163 µg/mL.
    • Urine gemcitabine concentrations were detectable after 7 days of instillation; urine dFdU concentration ranged between 1.48 and 0.36 µg/mL.
  • Daneshmand et al (2022)4 evaluated the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of INLEXZO as neoadjuvant treatment prior to radical cystectomy in a phase 1b study in patients with newly diagnosed muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) who were ineligible for or refused cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (N=23).
    • The mean urinary concentrations of gemcitabine/dFdU were 18.5/6.7 µg/mL (day 3) and 6.6/2.3 µg/mL (day 7) in the first dosing cycle; 15.0/4.4 µg/mL (day 24) and 7.8/2.7 µg/mL (day 28) in the second dosing cycle.
    • Plasma dFdU was detected in 23 out of 110 samples at low concentrations (0.1-0.3 mg/mL); plasma gemcitabine was not found in any sample.
  • Daneshmand et al (2026)5 evaluated the penetration, tissue distribution, and retention of gemcitabine and its active metabolites (gemcitabine diphosphate [dFdCDP] and gemcitabine triphosphate [dFdCTP]) in Penelope, a preclinical study comparing INLEXZO with traditional intravesical instillation methods in healthy minipigs (N=5).
    • With INLEXZO, metabolite concentrations were sustained across all bladder tissue layers for up to 96 hours, with urothelium/lamina propria dFdCDP levels of 20.8-75.5 ng/g (48 hours) and 15-134 ng/g (96 hours), and dFdCTP levels of 7.34-27.0 ng/g and 11.6-134 ng/g, respectively.
    • With INLEXZO, metabolite concentrations were consistently higher in the urothelium and lamina propria than in the muscle (dFdCTP levels: range, 2.39-3.45 ng/g [48 hours] and 2.29-8.66 ng/g [96 hours]).
  • Alternative Formats of Information
  • Hu et al (2025)7 presented a population PK model to characterize the PK and variability of urine gemcitabine-related component (GRC) following INLEXZO administration in patients with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)-unresponsive high-risk NMIBC with carcinoma in situ (CIS), with or without papillary tumors in the SunRISe-1 study. The population PK model used a sequential zero- and first-order release model, and the subgroup analysis identified no significant covariates of renal function affecting urine GRC amount. An exploratory exposure-response analysis evaluating the relationship between urine GRC amount and complete response rate, showed a flat relationship, supporting the current dose selection.

Product labeling

Section 12 Clinical Pharmacology

12.3 Pharmacokinetics

  • The systemic exposure of gemcitabine and the inactive uracil metabolite (dFdU) were evaluated between Days 2 and 7 during the indwelling period. The plasma gemcitabine concentrations were below the lower limit of quantification (0.1 µg/mL) in all patients at all time points. Eighteen patients (17%) had at least one quantifiable plasma dFdU concentration above the lower limit of quantification (0.1 µg/mL) and the maximum observed plasma dFdU concentration was 0.4 µg/mL. Plasma concentrations of both gemcitabine and dFdU are estimated to be less than 1% of the expected Cmax after intravenous administration of gemcitabine.2 
Excretion
  • Gemcitabine and dFdU are excreted in urine throughout the indwelling period for INLEXZO. Of the total gemcitabine dose, 77% was excreted by Day 7 and 99% was excreted by Day 21 in urine as gemcitabine and dFdU.2 
  • Mean urinary excretion on Days 2 through 5 ranged from 21 to 32 mg per day excreted in the urine as gemcitabine and dFdU.2 

CLINICAL DATA

Phase 1 Studies

van Valenberg et al (2024)3 evaluated the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor effect of INLEXZO in patients with recurrent intermediate-risk NMIBC in a prospective, open-label, phase 1b study (N=12).

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients received two 7-day (arm 1) or 21-day (arm 2) dosing cycles of INLEXZO over a 4- to 6-week period; between diagnostic cystoscopy and complete transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT).
  • In arm 1, patients received two 7-day INLEXZO cycles, with the first INLEXZO inserted on day 0 and removed on day 7, followed by a 14-day rest period, and the insertion of a second INLEXZO on day 21.
  • In arm 2, INLEXZO was administered in two consecutive 21-day cycles, with the first insertion on day 0 and replacement on day 21.
  • Subsequent TURBT or bladder biopsy was performed on days 28 and 42 for arms 1 and 2, respectively.
  • A post-TURBT/final PK visit occurred on days 32 and 47 for arms 1 and 2, respectively, before patients began a 2-year surveillance period for recurrence assessment.
  • Primary endpoint: Safety
  • Secondary endpoints: Tolerability, PK, and preliminary efficacy (complete response and partial response rates)

Results

  • A total of 12 patients were enrolled (arm 1, n=11; arm 2, n=1) to receive 1 or more doses of INLEXZO.
  • All 12 patients completed post-TURBT/final PK visit and entered the 2-year surveillance period.
  • Plasma gemcitabine concentrations remained below the detection level; dFdU concentration ranged between 0.101 and 0.163 µg/mL.
  • Urine gemcitabine concentrations were detectable after 7 days of instillation, with the
  • maximum mean concentrations observed 3 days after both dosing cycles (range, 18.2- 15.7 µg/mL); urine dFdU concentration ranged between 1.48 and 0.36 µg/Ml.

Daneshmand et al (2022)4 conducted an open-label phase 1b study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and PK of INLEXZO as neoadjuvant treatment prior to radical cystectomy in patients with newly diagnosed MIBC who were ineligible for or refused cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (N=23).

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were serially enrolled in 2 study arms; arm 1 consisted of patients with residual tumor >3 cm after TURBT and arm 2 consisted of patients with residual tumor <3 cm after TURBT.
  • Patients in both arms received two 7-day dosing cycles of INLEXZO with a 14-day resting period in between cycles, before undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) on study days 28 and 42 for study arms 1 and 2, respectively.
  • In arm 1, gemcitabine and dFdU levels were measured in plasma and urine on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 of each treatment cycle, and on day 14; in arm 2, they were measured in plasma only.
  • Primary endpoint: Safety
  • Secondary endpoints: Tolerability, PK, and preliminary efficacy (pathological complete response and pathological partial response)

Results

  • A total of 23 patients were enrolled (arm 1, n=11; arm 2, n=12) and received at least 1 INLEXZO insertion.
  • In the first dosing cycle, the mean urine concentrations of gemcitabine and dFdU, respectively, were 18.5 and 6.7 µg/mL on day 3 and 6.6 and 2.3 µg/mL on day 7.
  • In the second dosing cycle, the mean urine concentrations of gemcitabine and dFdU, respectively, were 15.0 and 4.4 µg/mL on day 24 and 7.8 and 2.7 µg/mL on day 28.
  • Plasma gemcitabine was not found in any sample at any time point.
  • Plasma dFdU was detected in 23 of 110 samples at low concentrations, ranging from 0.1 to 0.3 µg/mL. Additional analyses suggested patients with MIBC (cT3 tumors) at the time of RC accounted for the majority of cases of plasma dFdU exposure.8

PRECLINICAL DATA

Penelope Study

Daneshmand et al (2026)5 compared the penetration, tissue distribution, and retention of gemcitabine and its active metabolites (dFdCDP and dFdCTP) with INLEXZO vs traditional intravesical instillation methods in minipigs (N=5).

Study Design/Methods

  • This evaluation was done in an animal model because clinical studies cannot directly characterize the duration or depth of gemcitabine penetration within bladder tissue.
  • Three healthy female minipigs received intravesical gemcitabine instillation, and 2 healthy female minipigs received INLEXZO.
  • All minipigs were assessed for penetration of active gemcitabine metabolites across different tissues of the bladder wall for over 96 hours.
  • Collected bladder tissue samples included the dome (urothelium and lamina propria), left and right lateral wall, and trigone. Processed samples were analyzed for gemcitabine and its active metabolites using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
  • The 3 minipigs receiving intravesical gemcitabine instillation were administered a 50 mL solution containing 2 g of freebase equivalent of gemcitabine hydrochloride (dissolved in saline at 40 mg/mL) via a Foley balloon catheter for 2 hours.5,9
    • Following intravesical instillation of 2 g gemcitabine and 2 hours exposure of the instilled formulation, the Foley balloon catheter was removed, and complete urine and instillation fluid were collected.9 
    • Tissue samples were collected from animal 1 at 2 hours (end of the instillation period) and from animal 6 at 24 hours and animal 5 at 96 hours.9 
  • The 2 minipigs receiving INLEXZO were administered 225 mg of freebase equivalent of gemcitabine.5 INLEXZO was inserted directly into the bladder, which was left in place for the duration of the study until necropsy.5,9 
    • Tissue samples were collected at necropsy at different time intervals after INLEXZO insertion (animal 4, 48 hours; animal 3, 96 hours).9

Results

Intravesical Gemcitabine Instillation
  • Average bladder gemcitabine concentrations were detected across all bladder regions at 2 hours and were 5.5 ng/g at 24 hours and 38.6 ng/g at 96 hours.
  • Active metabolite concentrations were detected in all bladder regions and layers at 2 hours with dFdCDP levels (urothelium/lamina propria, 1260–4950 ng/g; muscle, 268–630 ng/g) and dFdCTP levels (urothelium/lamina propria, 272–1550 ng/g; muscle, 109–278 ng/g), representing 0.02–0.25% of the gemcitabine tissue concentrations.
  • By 24 hours and 96 hours, the concentrations of active metabolites were virtually undetectable.
  • Urine/instillation fluid concentrations at 2 hours after the indwelling period were 13.1 mg/ml and 0.0648 mg/ml for gemcitabine and its metabolite (dfdU), respectively.
  • Urine gemcitabine concentrations at 2 hours after the indwelling period in 2 minipigs were 9700 µg/ml and 8000 µg/ml, but declined over time, reaching 2400 µg/ml at 24 hours and 3.84 µg/ml at 96 hours.
INLEXZO
  • With INLEXZO treatment, average bladder gemcitabine concentrations were 3140 ng/g (48 hours) and 3853 ng/g (96 hours).
  • Active metabolites, dFdCDP and dFdCTP, were detected in all bladder tissue layers at 48 hours and 96 hours.
    • At 48 hours and 96 hours, dFdCDP levels ranged from 20.8-75.5 ng/g and 15-134 ng/g in the urothelium/lamina propria, respectively.9 At both time points, dFdCTP levels in the muscle were below the levels of quantification.
    • At 48 hours, dFdCTP levels ranged from 7.34-27.0 ng/g in the urothelium/lamina propria and 2.39-3.45 ng/g in the muscle.5 At 96 hours, dFdCTP levels ranged from 11.6-134 ng/g and 2.29-8.66 ng/g, respectively.
  • Average urine gemcitabine concentrations of about 5 μg/ml were achieved by 24 hours and remained above this level through 96 hours, with maximum urine gemcitabine concentrations at 48-72 hours ranging from 30.8-33.6 µg/ml.
  • Recovered INLEXZO devices at necropsy contained 180 mg (80% from the theoretical initial amount of 225 mg) and 81.9 mg (36.4%) at 48 and 96 hours.
  • Residual dFdU was below the lower limit of quantification.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 03 April 2026.

 

References

1 Daneshmand S, Heijden MSV der, Jacob JM, et al. TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin–unresponsive high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from the phase IIb SunRISe-1 study. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(33):3578-3588.  
2 INLEXZO (gemcitabine intravesical system) [Prescribing Information]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc; https://www.jnjlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/INLEXZO-pi.pdf
3 van Valenberg FJP, van der Heijden AG, Cutie CJ, et al. The safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of a gemcitabine-releasing intravesical system (TAR-200) in American Urological Association-defined intermediate-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a phase 1b study. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024;62:8-15.  
4 Daneshmand S, Brummelhuis ISG, Pohar KS, et al. The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical drug delivery system (TAR-200) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a phase I trial. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(7):344.e1-344.e9.  
5 Daneshmand S, Wuyts K, DeMeulder M, et al. Tissue penetration of gemcitabine and gemcitabine phosphate metabolites following gemcitabine intravesical system administration versus standard intravesical instillation in a preclinical minipig model. [published online ahead of print March 20, 2026]. Eur Urol Focus. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2026.03.007.  
6 Daneshmand S, Wuyts K, Meulder MD, et al. Penelope: tissue penetration of gemcitabine phosphate metabolites following TAR-200 administration vs standard intravesical instillation in minipigs. Poster presented at: Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; December 4-6, 2024; Dallas, TX.  
7 Hu S, Yuan D, Li M, et al. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response analysis for TAR-200, an intravesical drug releasing system for bladder cancer treatment. Abstract presented at: American Conference on Pharmacometrics (ACoP); October 18-21, 2025; Aurora, CO.  
8 Daneshmand S, Brummelhuis ISG, Pohar KS, et al. Supplement to: The safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a neoadjuvant gemcitabine intravesical drug delivery system (TAR-200) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: a phase I trial. Urol Oncol. 2022;40(7):344.e1-344.e9.  
9 Daneshmand S, Wuyts K, DeMeulder M, et al. Supplement to: Tissue penetration of gemcitabine and gemcitabine phosphate metabolites following gemcitabine intravesical system administration versus standard intravesical instillation in a preclinical minipig model. [published online ahead of print March 20, 2026]. Eur Urol Focus. doi:10.1016/j.euf.2026.03.007.