This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
SUMMARY
- INLEXZO (gemcitabine intravesical system) is an intravesical drug releasing system (iDRS), referred to as TAR-200 in literature.1
- No prospective, randomized, head-to-head trials study comparing the efficacy and safety of INLEXZO to gemcitabine or gemcitabine/docetaxel have been conducted.
- Alternative Formats of Information
- A video summary of Daneshmand et al (2024)2 can be accessed in the following link:
- Daneshmand et al (2024)2 presented results of Project Penelope, a preclinical study that compared the penetration, retention, and tissue distribution of gemcitabine and its active metabolites (diphosphate and triphosphate of gemcitabine) with INLEXZO vs traditional intravesical instillation methods in minipigs (N=5).
- Elevated concentrations of gemcitabine diphosphate and triphosphate were observed across all bladder layers 2 hours after treatment with intravesical instillation.
- With INLEXZO, gemcitabine diphosphate and triphosphate concentrations were sustained in all bladder tissue layers for up to 96 hours.
- With INLEXZO, higher gemcitabine diphosphate and triphosphate concentrations were maintained in the urothelium and lamina propria than those in the muscle.
- SunRISe-5 (NCT06211764) is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study that aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of INLEXZO vs the investigator’s choice of intravesical chemotherapy (mitomycin C or gemcitabine) in patients with recurrent, papillary-only high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) who have received Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy and have refused or are ineligible for radical cystectomy (RC). Enrollment is planned for approximately 250 patients. The primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS).3,4
- As of November 5, 2024, 98% (~120) of the sites have been activated and 42% (105/250) of the target population has been randomized.5
PRECLINICAL DATA
Project Penelope
Daneshmand et al (2024)2 compared the penetration, retention, and tissue distribution of gemcitabine and its active metabolites (diphosphate and triphosphate of gemcitabine) with INLEXZO vs traditional intravesical instillation methods in minipigs (N=5).
Study Design/Methods
- Three minipigs were treated with intravesical gemcitabine instillation, and 2 minipigs were treated with INLEXZO.
- All minipigs were assessed for penetration of active gemcitabine metabolites across different tissues of the bladder wall for over 96 hours.
- Collected samples included the dome (urothelium and lamina propria), left and right lateral wall, and trigone. Processed samples were analyzed for gemcitabine and its active metabolites using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).
- The 3 minipigs receiving intravesical gemcitabine instillation were administered a 50 mL solution containing 2 g of freebase equivalent of gemcitabine hydrochloride (dissolved in saline at 40 mg/mL) via a Foley balloon catheter for 2 hours.
- The 2 minipigs receiving INLEXZO were administered 225 mg of freebase equivalent of gemcitabine. INLEXZO was inserted directly into the bladder, and was left in place for the duration of the study until necropsy.
- Tissue samples were collected at necropsy at different time intervals after instillation (animal 1, 2 hours; animal 6, 24 hours; animal 5, 96 hours) and INLEXZO insertion (animal 4, 48 hours; animal 3, 96 hours). See Figure: Treatment Administration Schedule for Minipigs.
Treatment Administration Schedule for Minipigs2

Results
Intravesical Gemcitabine Instillation
Mean Concentrations of Gemcitabine Active Metabolites in Bladder Tissue Layers After Intravesical Gemcitabine Instillation2

Abbreviations: dFdCDP, diphosphate of gemcitabine; dFdCTP, triphosphate of gemcitabine; Instill, instillation; LP, lamina propria; Uro, urothelium.
Note: Results were reported as the mean of the 4 tissue samples collected (dome, left and right lateral walls, and trigone). Results from the total tissue sample or by the tissue type (Uro/LP and muscle wall) are reported separately. “All” refers to all layers of the bladder. Gemcitabine active metabolites refer to dFdCDP and dFdCTP.
INLEXZO
- With INLEXZO treatment, gemcitabine diphosphate and triphosphate levels were detectable in all bladder tissue layers during the 48- and 96-hour indwelling periods; see Figure: Mean Concentrations of Gemcitabine Active Metabolites in Bladder Tissue Layers After Treatment With INLEXZO.
- Active metabolite concentrations were higher in the urothelium and lamina propria than in the muscle; the concentrations remained high for up to 96 hours in both tissue samples.
- Active metabolite concentrations were lower than those observed 2 hours after gemcitabine instillation but were sustained across all bladder tissues for up to 96 hours.
Mean Concentrations of Gemcitabine Active Metabolites in Bladder Tissue Layers After Treatment With INLEXZO2

Abbreviations: dFdCDP, diphosphate of gemcitabine; dFdCTP, triphosphate of gemcitabine; LP, lamina propria; Uro, urothelium.
Note: Results were reported as the mean of the 4 tissue samples collected (dome, left and right lateral walls, and trigone). Results from the total tissue sample or by the tissue type (Uro/LP and muscle wall) are reported separately. “All” refers to all layers of the bladder. Gemcitabine active metabolites refer to dFdCDP and dFdCTP.
Literature Search
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 19 August 2025.
1 | Daneshmand S, Van der Heijden MS, Jacob JM, et al. TAR-200 for Bacillus Calmette-Guérin-unresponsive high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: results from the phase IIb SunRISe-1 study. [published online ahead of print July 30, 2025]. J Clin Oncol. doi:10.1200/jco-25-01651. |
2 | Daneshmand S, Wuyts K, Meulder MD, et al. Penelope: tissue penetration of gemcitabine phosphate metabolites following TAR-200 administration vs standard intravesical instillation in minipigs. Poster presented at: Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; December 4-6, 2024; Dallas, TX. |
3 | Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A study of TAR-200 versus intravesical chemotherapy in participants with recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (HR-NMIBC) after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) (SunRISe-5). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 July 15]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT06211764 NLM Identifier: NCT06211764. |
4 | Porten S, Bhanvadia S, Najmi S, et al. SunRISe-5: a phase 3, randomized, open-label study of TAR-200 compared with intravesical chemotherapy after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Oral Presentation presented at: American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Meeting; May 3-6, 2024; San Antonio, TX. |
5 | Porten S, Bhanvadia S, Najmi S, et al. SunRISe-5: a phase 3, randomized, open-label study of TAR-200 compared with intravesical chemotherapy after Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in recurrent high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Poster presented at: Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting; December 4-6, 2024; Dallas, TX. |