This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Nipocalimab - Clinical Use in Sjogren's Disease (SjD)

Last Updated: 02/22/2026

SUMMARY  

  • The company cannot recommend any unapproved practices, procedures, or usage of nipocalimab.
  • Nipocalimab is a fully human, aglycosylated, effectorless immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to the IgG-binding site on the neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn) and is being studied for the treatment of adult patients with primary Sjogren’s disease (SjD).1,2
    • By selectively blocking FcRn, nipocalimab interferes with IgG recycling and in turn reduces circulating IgG levels, including pathogenic IgG autoantibodies that may contribute to primary SjD (those that target Ro/La ribonuclear complexes, ie, antibodies to primary SjD-associated antigen A [anti-Ro/SSA] and primary SjD-associated antigen B [anti-La/SSB]).3
  • DAFFODIL is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in adults with moderate to severe SjD. The results are not currently available. Details regarding the study status and study design of DAFFODIL can be found on clinicaltrials.gov and are summarized below.4
  • DAHLIAS is a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in adult patients with moderately to severely active primary SjD.1,5
    • The primary endpoint was change from baseline in Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ClinESSDAI) score at week 24. Patients treated with nipocalimab 15 mg/kg demonstrated statistically significant improvement in ClinESSDAI score from baseline to 24 weeks vs PBO (least square [LS] mean change: nipocalimab 15 mg/kg, -6.40 vs PBO, -3.74; P=0.0018).3
    • Nipocalimab treatment was well tolerated with no new safety signals observed.

BACKGROUND

  • SjD is a chronic, autoimmune, systemic, progressive disease that can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1
  • SjD is characterized by lymphocytic infiltration of exocrine glands and B-cell dysfunction, resulting in sicca syndrome (dryness of the eye, oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, and/or vagina).6,7 Ocular and oral dryness are the primary local manifestations, with >25% of patients also developing systemic symptoms.7,8 Commonly affected organs include cardiovascular (Raynaud phenomenon), digestive (dysphagia, chronic gastritis), pulmonary (pleuritis), ocular (uveitis), cutaneous, neurological, eyes/nose/throat, and urological systems.8 SjD also increases the risk of hematologic malignancies in patients.9,10
  • SjD is classified into 2 categories6,11:
    • Primary SjD: occurs by itself in an individual without underlying autoimmune disorder.
    • Secondary SjD: associated with other autoimmune diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), or systemic sclerosis.
  • Primary SjD has a global incidence of 6.92 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.98-8.86) per 100,000 person-years at risk and a global prevalence of 60.82 (95% CI, 43.69-77.94) cases per 100,000 people.12 It is more common in women than among men (incidence ratio, 9.15:1), with an average onset of 56.16 years of age (95% CI, 52.54-59.78).12
  • Primary SjD develops from the activation of both innate and adaptive immune systems, triggered initially by viral infection of the salivary epithelial cells.13,14 This leads to B-lymphocyte hyperactivity, resulting in abnormally high levels of IgG and production of pathogenic IgG autoantibodies specifically targeting Ro/La ribonuclear complexes (ie, anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB).13,14 These pathogenic autoantibodies form immune complexes that activate inflammatory cascades, causing extraglandular tissue damage.13 Elevated B-cell activating factor levels are observed in the sera of patients with primary SjD and are upregulated in their salivary glands.15 Autoantibodies for rheumatoid factor, anti-Ro, and anti-La appear for a median of 4-6 years before symptom development.16 As the disease progresses, periductal infiltrate becomes more organized into ectopic lymphoid tissue, with an increase in the number of B-cells and formation of ectopic germinal centers.13
  • Currently, there are no approved treatments to alter disease progression in SjD; thus, treatment strategies focus on symptomatic management.7 The Sjogren’s Syndrome Foundation has developed guidelines for assessing and managing dry eyes, dry mouth, and the systemic manifestations of SjD.17-19

CLINICAL DATA

Phase 3 Study- DAFFODIL

DAFFOFIL4 is an ongoing phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in adults with moderate to severe SjD.

Study Design/Methods

  • Eligibility criteria of the DAFFODIL trial:
    • Adult patients (≥18 years of age) who are medically stable on physical examination, medical history, vital signs, clinical laboratory tests, and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) performed at screening
    • Diagnosis of SjD as per 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria
    • Seropositive for antibodies to Ro/SSA (Ro60 and/or Ro52)
    • Total Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ClinESSDAI) score ≥5 at screening
    • For patients of childbearing potential must have a negative beta-hCG pregnancy test at screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at week 0 before randomization.
  • Key exclusion criteria include:
    • History of severe, progressive and/or uncontrolled disorders such as hepatic, gastrointestinal, renal, pulmonary, cardiovascular, psychiatric, neurological, musculoskeletal, hypertension and autoimmune disorders or clinically significant abnormalities in screening laboratory
    • History of allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to nipocalimab or its excipients or excipients used in the placebo formulation
    • Any confirmed or suspected clinical immunodeficiency syndrome not related to treatment of his/her SjD or has a history of congenital or hereditary immunodeficiency.
  • A target of 600 eligible patients will be randomly assigned to subcutaneous (SC) nipocalimab+standard of care (SOC) and PBO+SOC treatments till week 48.
    • Eligible patients from both the treatment arms will enter an open-label extension phase and will continue to receive nipocalimab until week 143.
  • Efficacy and safety will be evaluated through week 48. Please refer to Table: Study Objectives and Endpoints.

Study Objectives and Endpoints4
Objectives
Endpoints
Primary Endpoint
To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab in patients with SjD by assessing the systemic disease activity.
  • Change from baseline in ClinESSDAI at week 48
Secondary Endpoint
To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab in patients with SjD by assessing additional measures in systemic disease activity.
  • Improvement from baseline in MCII in ClinESSDAI score at week 48
  • Improvement from baseline in ClinESSDAI score at week 48 in participants with high IgG levels at baseline.
  • Change from baseline in ClinESSDAI at week 8.
To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab on glandular function in patients with SjD.
  • Change from baseline in stimulated salivary flow rate at week 48.
To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab on dryness and joint pain symptoms in patients with SjD.
  • Change from baseline in Sjogren’s Symptoms Dryness score at week 48.
  • Change from baseline in Sjogren’s Symptoms Joint Pain score at week 48
To evaluate the efficacy of nipocalimab on dryness, fatigue and pain in patients with SjD and its impact upon daily activities.
  • Change from baseline in ESSPRI score at week 48.
  • Change from baseline in FACIT-Fatigue score at week 48.
Abbreviations: ClinESSDAI, Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index; ESSPRI, EULAR Sjogren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; FACIT, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy; IgG, Immunoglobulin; MCII, Minimal Clinically Important Improvement; SjD, Sjogren’s disease.

Phase 2 Study- DAHLIAS

Noaiseh et al (2025)3 assessed the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial in adult patients with moderately to severely active primary SjD.

Study Design/Methods

  • Patients were permitted to receive background standard-of-care therapies, including immunomodulators, antimalarial drugs, or glucocorticoids, as allowed by the protocol.20
  • The study design is shown in Figure: Phase 2 Study Design (Primary SjD).

Phase 2 Study Design (Primary SjD)1,3

Abbreviations: ACR, American College of Rheumatology; anti-Ro/SSA, primary SjD-associated antigen A; clinESSDAI, Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; CRESS, Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjogren’s Syndrome; ESSPRI, EULAR Sjogren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index; EULAR, European League Against Rheumatism; IV, intravenously; PBO, placebo; R, randomized; SjD, Sjogren’s disease; STAR, Sjogren’s Tool for Assessing Response.

  • Other key exploratory endpoints included pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity measures, clinical biomarkers, and pharmacodynamics.

Results

  • A total of 163 patients were randomized to receive intravenous (IV) nipocalimab 5 mg/kg (n=53) or 15 mg/kg (n=54) or PBO (n=56) every 2 weeks (Q2W) through week 22.3
  • Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. For complete baseline demographics, see Table: Baseline Demographic Characteristics (Intent-To-Treat Population).

Baseline Demographic Characteristics (Intent-To-Treat Population)3,21
Characteristics
PBO
(n=56)

Nipocalimab
All Patients
(N=163)
5 mg/kg Q2W
(n=53)
15 mg/kg Q2W
(n=54)
Age, years, mean (SD)
47.3 (12.60)
48.3 (11.83)
48.6 (12.07)
48.1 (12.12)
Female, n (%)
52 (93)
49 (92)
50 (93)
151 (93)
White, n (%)
50 (89)
49 (92)
49 (91)
148 (91)
Time since diagnosis, years, mean (SD)
6.9 (6.65)
6.0 (6.62)
5.6 (4.33)
6.2 (5.96)
ClinESSDAI score, mean (SD)
10.0 (3.75)
9.4 (3.05)
10.2 (3.64)
9.9 (3.49)
ESSPRI score, mean (SD)
7.0 (1.26)
7.0 (1.26)
7.2 (1.19)
7.1 (1.23)
Total IgG levels,a g/L, median (range)
14.8 (7.7-40.5)
14.8 (4.6-35.2)
15.5 (7.6-49.6)
14.9 (4.6-49.6)
Autoantibody positivity, N
55
52
53
160
   Anti-Ro60, %
98.2
98.1
98.1
98.1
   Anti-La, %
74.5
76.9
64.2
71.9
   Anti-Ro52, %
78.2
86.5
77.4
80.6
   RF, %
78.6
71.7
63.0
71.2
Abbreviations: ClinESSDAI, Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index; ESSPRI, European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index; IgG, immunoglobulin G; ITT, intent-to-treat; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks, RF, rheumatoid factor; SD, standard deviation.
aMeasured at a central laboratory. Reference range, 6.03-16.13 g/L.

Efficacy
  • A statistically significant change in ClinESSDAI from baseline was observed at week 24 for nipocalimab 15 mg/kg compared to PBO (P=0.0018).3
  • Treatment with nipocalimab resulted in greater LS mean (90% CI) improvement from baseline to week 24 in the nipocalimab 5 mg/kg Q2W and 15 mg/kg Q2W groups when compared with PBO, as illustrated in Figure: LS Mean (90% CI) Change in ClinESSDAI at Week 24.

LS Mean (90% CI) Change in ClinESSDAI at Week 243

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ClinESSDAI, Clinical European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index; LS, least squares; NS, nonsignificant; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks.


Secondary Endpoints21
Endpoint-Change from Baseline at Week 24
LS Mean Difference (90% CI):
Nipocalimab vs PBOa

Nominal P-valueb Nipocalimab 15 mg/kg Q2W vs PBO
5 mg/kg Q2W (n=53)
15 mg/kg Q2W (n=54)
PhGA
-2.26 (-8.50 to 3.99)
-14.50 (-20.81 to -8.19)
<0.001
ESSDAI
-0.52 (-1.67 to 0.63)
-1.79 (-2.94 to -0.63)
0.012
ESSPRI
0.62 (0.01 to 1.23)
-0.41 (-1.03 to 0.20)
0.268
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ESSDAI, European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index; ESSPRI, European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Patient Reported Index; LS, least squares; PhGA, Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks.
aCompared with PBO group using a Mixed Effects Repeated Measures model with baseline score, study treatment, visit, region, baseline steroid use, baseline antimalarial use, and an interaction of treatment and visit as terms in the model. For continuous endpoints, participants with an intercurrent event per protocol were considered to have missing data thereafter.
bThese endpoints were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Therefore, the P-values displayed are nominal, and statistical significance has not been established.


Supportive Endpoints21
Endpoint- Responder Rate at Week 24
Difference in Proportions (% [90% CI]):
Nipocalimab vs PBOa

Nominal P-valueb Nipocalimab 15 mg/kg Q2W vs PBO
5 mg/kg Q2W (n=53)
15 mg/kg Q2W (n=54)
ESSDAI-3
9.5 (-5.8 to 24.8)
16.1 (0.8 to 31.4)
0.172
STAR
11.7 (-3.9 to 27.2)
23.7 (8.4 to 38.9)
0.017
CRESS
25.5 (11.5 to 39.5)
30.3 (16.3 to 44.3)
0.001
DALc
18.9 (3.6 to 34.2)
19.8 (4.5 to 35.0)
0.046
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; CRESS, Composite of Relevant Endpoints for Sjogren’s Syndrome; DAL, Disease Activity Level; ESSDAI, European League Against Rheumatism Sjogren’s Syndrome Disease Activity Index; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks; STAR, Sjogren’s Tool for Assessing Response.
aValues are percentages. Statistically compared with the PBO group using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with region, baseline steroid use, and baseline antimalarial use as stratification factors. For binary composite endpoints, participants with intercurrent events were considered nonresponders after the event.
bThese endpoints were not adjusted for multiple comparisons. Therefore, the p-values displayed are nominal, and statistical significance has not been established.
cDAL response is a reduction by at least 1 level from baseline in disease activity level in at least 1 ClinESSDAI domain (eg, articular, hematological, cutaneous, and constitutional).

Safety
  • Overall, no cases of severe hypoalbuminemia (<20 g/L) or deaths were reported.
  • Severe infections or infections requiring IV anti-infectives occurred in 3.8%, 1.9%, and 1.8% of participants in the nipocalimab 5 mg/kg, nipocalimab 15 mg/kg, and PBO groups, respectively, none of which were deemed related to the study treatment.
  • For safety results, see Table: Nipocalimab Safety and Tolerability.

Nipocalimab Safety and Tolerability3
AEs, n (%)
PBO (n=56)
Nipocalimab
5 mg/kg Q2W (n=53)
15 mg/kg Q2W (n=54)
AEs
35 (63)
42 (79)
43 (80)
Serious AEs
3 (5)
4 (8)
4 (7)
Severe infectionsa
1 (2)
2 (4)
1 (2)
Opportunistic infections
0
0
0
Infusion reactions
2 (4)
6 (11)
1 (2)
Hypersensitivity reactions
3 (5)
6 (11)
7 (13)
MACEb
2 (4)
0
0
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; IV, intravenous; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks.
aInfections that are severe or require IV anti-infective or operative/invasive intervention, as assessed by the investigator.
bCardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke.

Pharmacokinetic (PK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) Activity
  • In a PK and PD simulation analysis, a 77% maximum reduction in total IgG was observed.21 
    • Pre-dose (minimum) median reduction of 61% in total IgG was observed at week 24 in the nipocalimab 15 mg/kg group.
  • Dose-dependent reductions from baseline in total IgG were observed with nipocalimab which returned to baseline levels by week 30.22

Observed Predose (Minimum) Percent Change from Baseline in Clinical Biomarkers at Week 2422,a
Median (IQR)
PBO (n=56)
Nipocalimab
5 mg/kg Q2W (n=53)
15 mg/kg Q2W (n=54)
Total IgG
-0.5
(-6.8 to -5.0)

-30.0 (-41.0 to -22.2)
-60.9 (-66.0 to -45.7)
IgG subclasses
   IgG1
-1.9
(-9.4 to 3.8)

-29.7 (-49.1 to -21.1)
-60.0 (-65.7 to -44.9)
   IgG2
-1.6
(-10.2 to 10.2)

-30.4 (-41.6 to -19.1)
-54.7 (-64.0 to -41.4)
   IgG3
0 (-11.4 to 5.2)
-31.7 (-42.2 to -18.8)
-54.2 (-62.5 to -47.1)
   IgG4
-2.6
(-11.1 to 4.8)

-27.6 (-43.1 to -17.5)
-50.0 (-58.6 to 34.1)
IgG autoantibodiesb
   Anti-Ro60
6.6 (-8.0 to 20.3)
-29.5 (-43.4 to -18.1)
-60.1 (-72.3 to -42.4)
   Anti-La
8.5 (-9.3 to 22.7)
-32.7 (-49.0 to -18.1)
-53.5 (-62.7 to -36.7)
   Anti-Ro52
6.1 (-6.3 to 18.8)
-23.0 (-39.3 to -14.1)
-50.9 (-62.7 to -37.0)
C3d-CIC
5.7
(-21.7 to 28.1)

-37.5 (-47.3 to 0)
-55.3 (-67.5 to -47.6)
IgM
2.5 (-6.5 to 10.0)
-5.0 (-11.6 to 2.2)
-10.5 (-22.0 to -4.1)
IgA
-1.2 (-6.2 to 3.7)
3.4 (-5.7 to 11.4)
6.0 (-1.0 to 12.2)
RF
0 (-3.4 to 4.0)
-10.7 (-19.4 to 0)
-15.3 (-29.0 to 0)
ESR
-16.7
(-46.1 to 14.0)

-17.1 (-34.8 to 25.0)
-38.5 (-58.3 to 0)
Abbreviations: C3d-CIC, C3d-bound circulating immune complex; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Ig, immunoglobulin; IQR, interquartile range; PBO, placebo; Q2W, every 2 weeks; RF, rheumatoid factor.
aIf a patient missed a planned dose of study intervention at any visit, their data were excluded from all subsequent visits after the first occurrence of a missed dose. Only data from patients with ≥1 valid postbaseline blood sample drawn for pharmacodynamic analysis were included.
bOnly data from patients who were positive for anti-Ro60, anti-La, or anti-Ro52 at baseline were included in the anti-Ro60, anti-La, and anti-Ro52 analyses, respectively.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 18 February 2026.

References

1 Hubbard JJ, Campbell K, Sivils K, et al. Design of a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study to assess the efficacy and safety of nipocalimab, an FcRn antagonist, in adults with primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Poster presented at: 15th International Symposium on Sjögren’s Syndrome; September 7-10, 2022; Rome, Italy.  
2 Ling LE, Hillson JL, Tiessen RG, et al. M281, an anti‐FcRn antibody: pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety across the full range of IgG reduction in a first‐in‐human study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;105(4):1031-1039.  
3 Noaiseh G, Sivils KL, Campbell K, et al. Efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in patients with moderate-to-severe Sjögren’s disease (DAHLIAS): a randomised, phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2025;406(10518):2435-2448.  
4 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Nipocalimab in moderate to severe Sjogren’s disease (DAFFODIL). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2026 February 13]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06741969 NLM Identifier: NCT06741969.  
5 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. A study of nipocalimab in adults with primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS). In: ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). 2000- [cited 2025 November 05]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04968912 NLM Identifier: NCT04968912.  
6 Both T, Dalm VA, van Hagen PM, et al. Reviewing primary Sjögren’s syndrome: beyond the dryness - from pathophysiology to diagnosis and treatment. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(3):191-200.  
7 Thalayasingam N, Baldwin K, Judd C, et al. New developments in Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(Suppl 6):vi53-vi61.  
8 Retamozo S, Acar-Denizli N, Rasmussen A, et al. Systemic manifestations of primary Sjögren’s syndrome out of the ESSDAI classification: prevalence and clinical relevance in a large international, multi-ethnic cohort of patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2019;37(3):97-106.  
9 Kauppi M, Pukkala E, Isomäki H. Elevated incidence of hematologic malignancies in patients with Sjögren’s syndrome compared with patients with rheumatoid arthritis (Finland). Cancer Causes Control. 1997;8(2):201-204.  
10 Theander E, Henriksson G, Ljungberg O, et al. Lymphoma and other malignancies in primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a cohort study on cancer incidence and lymphoma predictors. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65(6):796-803.  
11 Patel R, Shahane A. The epidemiology of Sjögren’s syndrome. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:247-255.  
12 Qin B, Wang J, Yang Z, et al. Epidemiology of primary Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(11):1983-1989.  
13 Kroese FG, Abdulahad WH, Haacke E, et al. B-cell hyperactivity in primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2014;10(4):483-499.  
14 Nocturne G, Mariette X. Advances in understanding the pathogenesis of primary Sjögren’s syndrome. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013;9(9):544-556.  
15 Groom J, Kalled SL, Cutler AH, et al. Association of BAFF/BLyS overexpression and altered B cell differentiation with Sjögren’s syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(1):59-68.  
16 Jonsson R, Theander E, Sjöström B, et al. Autoantibodies present before symptom onset in primary Sjögren syndrome. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1854-1855.  
17 Foulks GN, Forstot SL, Donshik PC, et al. Clinical guidelines for management of dry eye associated with Sjögren disease. Ocul Surf. 2015;13(2):118-132.  
18 Zero DT, Brennan MT, Daniels TE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for oral management of Sjögren disease: dental caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc. 2016;147(4):295-305.  
19 Carsons SE, Vivino FB, Parke A, et al. Treatment guidelines for rheumatologic manifestations of Sjögren’s syndrome: use of biologic agents, management of fatigue, and inflammatory musculoskeletal pain. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2017;69(4):517-527.  
20 Noaiseh G, Sivils KL, Campbell K, et al. Supplement to: Efficacy and safety of nipocalimab in patients with moderate-to-severe Sjögren’s disease (DAHLIAS): a randomised, phase 2, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2025;406(10518):2435-2448.  
21 Gottenberg JE, Sivils K, Campbell K, et al. Efficacy and safety of nipocalimab, an anti-FcRn monoclonal antibody, in primary Sjögren’s disease: results from a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (DAHLIAS). Oral Presentation presented at: EULAR Annual European Congress of Rheumatology; June 12-15, 2024; Vienna, Austria.  
22 Sivils KL, Leonardo S, Li H, et al. Pharmacodynamic effects of nipocalimab on disease biomarkers in patients with moderate-to-severe, active Sjögren’s disease: results from a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Poster presented at: American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Convergence; November 14-19, 2024; Washington, DC.