This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

Use of CONCERTA in Adolescents with ADHD

Last Updated: 07/08/2026

Summary

  • CONCERTA is indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in pediatric patients aged 13 to 17 years in doses up to 72 mg/day.1
  • The efficacy and safety of CONCERTA (OROS methylphenidate [MPH]) in adolescents with ADHD were evaluated in a multiphase, multicenter trial2 and in a community study.3

PRODUCT LABELING

Please refer to the following sections of the CONCERTA Full Prescribing Information that are relevant to your inquiry1: INDICATIONS AND USAGE, DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION, ADVERSE REACTIONS, and CLINICAL STUDIES.

CLINICAL DATA

Multicenter, Controlled Study

Wilens et al (2006)2 evaluated the efficacy and safety of CONCERTA 18 mg up to 72 mg in adolescents aged 13-18 years with ADHD (N=220).

Study Design/Methods

  • Four phases: a one-week washout phase; an open-label dose titration phase; a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind phase; and an open-label follow-up phase.
  • Eligible subjects underwent a one-week washout phase during which no ADHD medication was given, and at the end of which baseline measurements were made.
  • In the open-label dose titration phase, subjects (n=220) were initiated with once-daily CONCERTA 18 mg for 7 days. The dose was increased weekly (±2 days) by 18 mg increments to a maximum of 72 mg daily until the criteria for improvement in ADHD symptoms, measured on the investigator-scored ADHD Rating Scale (ADHD RS), was achieved. The criteria for improvement was described as a reduction of ≥30% from baseline in ADHD symptoms and a rating of “good” or “excellent” by the Global Assessment of Effectiveness (GAE).
  • 177 subjects who successfully completed the dose titration phase continued to the randomized, double-blind phase.  Subjects received their individualized CONCERTA dose (18 mg, 36 mg, 54 mg, or 72 mg) or a matched placebo once daily for 2 weeks, based on their dosage from the dose titration phase.
  • At the end of each week, efficacy, safety and adherence were assessed.  Efficacy was assessed using the ADHD RS (investigator and parent/caregiver), Conners-Wells’ Adolescent Self-Report Scale (CASS-L), Child Conflict Index (CCI) (parent/caregiver), the GAE (investigator) and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) Improvement subscale (investigator).
  • The primary efficacy measure was the change from baseline to the end of the double-blind phase in the total investigator-rated ADHD RS score. Subjects who completed the double-blind phase or discontinued the double-blind phase prematurely because of lack of efficacy were eligible to enter the 8-week, open-label phase at their individualized CONCERTA dose.

Results

Efficacy
  • CONCERTA was statistically and clinically significantly superior to placebo on the primary measure of efficacy, the mean change from baseline in investigator rating on the ADHD RS (P=0.001).
  • Post hoc analysis of responder rates showed that significantly more subjects responded to treatment with CONCERTA than placebo for all efficacy measures.  Similar results were reported by parents/caregivers.
  • Additionally, CONCERTA demonstrated significant superiority on the Conners-Wells’ Self-Report Scale for subject rated efficacy compared to placebo (P=0.001).
  • Adolescent-parent conflict was also significantly improved with CONCERTA compared to placebo (P=0.005), using the Child Conflict index.
  • At the end of the double-blind phase, 51% of subjects in the CONCERTA group reported treatment as good or excellent as measured by the GAE, compared to 33% of subjects receiving placebo (P=0.004).
  • A significantly higher number of investigators considered ADHD symptoms in their study subjects to be much improved or very much improved with CONCERTA (52%) compared to placebo (31%) (P=0.01).
Safety
  • The most frequently reported study-drug related adverse event was headache (placebo, 7%; CONCERTA, 3%).  Other treatment emergent events from the double-blind phase included decreased appetite (CONCERTA, 2%; placebo, 0%), insomnia (CONCERTA, 5%; placebo, n=0), and abdominal pain (CONCERTA, 1%; placebo, 2%).
  • Early discontinuations occurred in 28 subjects (31%) from the placebo group and 16 (18.4%) in the CONCERTA group.  Discontinuation from the study was primarily due to lack of efficacy (placebo, 25.6%; CONCERTA, 16.1%).

Open-Label Extension of Multicenter, Controlled Study

McGough et al (2006)4 evaluated the safety and tolerability outcomes from the open-label extension phase of the multicenter controlled study in adolescents.2

Study Design/Methods

  • 8-week, open-label extension phase
  • Subjects who continued in the extension phase received their individualized daily dose of CONCERTA, which was determined during the dose titration phase of the multicenter controlled study.
  • Safety assessments were collected on a monthly basis.

Results

  • A total of 171 (97%) of 177 subjects continued in the open-label extension phase, and 135 (79%) completed the extension phase.
  • The individualized doses were as follows: 18 mg/day (n=12), 36 mg/day (n=48), 54 mg/day (n=49), 72 mg/day (n=62).
  • A total of 96 (56%) subjects reported 189 adverse events, most of which were reported as mild or moderate in severity.
    • Eighty (42%) adverse events were considered to be treatment-related by investigators.
  • There was no statistically significant difference in the percentage of subjects reporting adverse events among the CONCERTA treatment groups.
  • The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse events were headache (12%), anorexia/decreased appetite (8%), insomnia (4%), and weight loss (2.3%).
  • No clinically significant changes were observed with regard to blood pressure and ECG measures.
  • When adverse events were evaluated according to weight-based doses, there was no trend showing that the higher weight-adjusted doses were associated with increased adverse events; CONCERTA was well tolerated up to 1.84 mg/kg/day.

Sub-Analysis of Open-Label, Dose-Titration Phase of Multicenter, Controlled Study

Newcorn et al (2010)5 conducted a sub-analysis of the multicenter placebo-controlled trial conducted by Wilens et al2 to assess the dose-response characteristics in adolescents aged 13-18 years (N=220) treated with CONCERTA during the 4-week, open-label, dose-escalation phase.

Study Design/Methods

  • Open-label, dose-titration phase
  • Dose titration was based on achievement of clinical response, which was defined as a reduction in the ADHD RS total score of ≥30% and a rating of either 'good' or 'excellent' on the GAE scale.
  • Patients were initiated on CONCERTA 18 mg/day and were evaluated for one week; if clinical response was not achieved, the dose was titrated by 18 mg increments on a weekly basis for up to four weeks with a maximum dose of 72 mg/day.

Results

  • At the end of the dose-titration phase, 182 (83%) of the initial 220 subjects had successfully titrated to an effective once-daily dose of CONCERTA.
  • A linear dose-response relationship was observed, with more non-responders achieving pre-defined threshold response with each escalated dose level.
  • 49 (27%) subjects achieved criterion improvement with 54 mg/day, and 70 (38%) achieved criterion improvement with 72 mg/day.
  • There were no significant relationships between absolute dose and subject weight, height, or age.
  • However, baseline symptom severity (specifically hyperactive-impulsive symptoms) was identified as a predictor of higher CONCERTA dose; when evaluating this relationship, a weight-based approach was slightly more sensitive than an absolute dosing strategy.
  • The incidence or severity of adverse events did not correlate with increases in absolute dose.

Community Setting Study

Schnipper and McDaniel (2001)3 studied the effectiveness of once-daily CONCERTA in adolescents aged 13 to 17 years with ADHD (n=256) in a community setting.

Study Design/Methods

  • Adolescents receiving methylphenidate (MPH) prior to study initiation were assigned a daily CONCERTA dose of 18, 36 or 54 mg based on previous MPH dose and clinical judgment.
  • Treatment naïve subjects were initiated with a CONCERTA dose of 18 mg, which was subsequently titrated in 18 mg increments to a safe and effective dose to not exceed 54 mg.
  • Doses were adjustable over the 9-month study at weekly intervals up or down between 18, 36, and 54 mg based on investigator discretion. Treatment effectiveness was assessed at baseline and at the end of months 3, 6 and 9. Safety assessments were performed at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 9 months of treatment. Ninety-one percent of adolescents enrolled (n=256) were receiving stimulant medication at enrollment.

Results

  • At the time of the interim analysis, 219 (83.2%) adolescents had received at least 3 months of CONCERTA therapy.
  • At month 3, 84.4% of parents/caregivers rated CONCERTA treatment as good or excellent using Global Assessments of treatment effectiveness.
  • At month 6, 96.8% of parent/caregivers rated CONCERTA therapy as good/excellent.  The Investigator’s Global Assessments of effectiveness showed similar results.
  • At month 3 or at final assessment (if treatment was discontinued earlier) parent/caregiver satisfaction was examined.  Of this group, 87.5% of parents reported being satisfied, very satisfied, or extremely satisfied with CONCERTA therapy.  CONCERTA therapy was preferred to prior medication to control ADHD symptoms by 75% of parents/caregivers. The reasons cited were as follows: increased convenience (84.1%), longer duration of effect (72.5%), and improved consistency and smoothness of effect (67.6%).
  • Once-daily CONCERTA therapy was well tolerated with 155 adolescents (60.6%) experiencing no adverse events. The most frequently reported adverse events included: headache, upper respiratory tract infection pharyngitis, accidental injury, and anorexia.

SELECTED ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

Additional studies have been conducted with CONCERTA in adolescents with ADHD and the citations are included for your reference.6-25

LITERATURE SEARCH

A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) pertaining to this topic was conducted on 17 February 2026. Please note that the topic pertains specifically to the use of CONCERTA (OROS MPH) for the treatment of ADHD in adolescents.

 

References

1 CONCERTA (methylphenidate HCl) [Prescribing Information]. Titusville, NJ: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc;https://www.janssenlabels.com/package-insert/product-monograph/prescribing-information/CONCERTA-pi.pdf
2 Wilens TE, McBurnett K, Bukstein O, et al. Multisite Controlled Study of OROS Methylphenidate in the Treatment of Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(1):82-90.  
3 Schnipper E, McDaniel D. Effectiveness of a once-daily OROS formulation of MPH in adolescents with ADHD in a community setting. Poster presented at: The American Psychiatric Association Annual Meeting; May 5-10,2001; New Orleans, LA.  
4 McGough JJ, McBurnett K, Bukstein O, et al. Once-Daily OROS Methylphenidate Is Safe and Well Tolerated in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adol Psychop. 2006;16(3):351-356.  
5 Newcorn JH, Stein MA, Cooper KM. Dose–Response Characteristics in Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Treated with OROS® Methylphenidate in a 4-Week, Open-Label, Dose-Titration Study. J Child Adol Psychop. 2010;20(3):187-196.  
6 Hammerness P, Wilens T, Mick E, et al. Cardiovascular Effects of Longer-Term, High-Dose OROS Methylphenidate in Adolescents with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. J Pediatrics. 2009;155(1):84-89.e1.  
7 Cox DJ, Moore M, Burket R, et al. Rebound Effects with Long-Acting Amphetamine or Methylphenidate Stimulant Medication Preparations among Adolescent Male Drivers with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2008;18(1):1-10.  
8 Cox DJ, Merkel RL, Penberthy JK, et al. Impact of Methylphenidate Delivery Profiles on Driving Performance of Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43(3):269-275.  
9 Cox DJ, Humphrey JW, Merkel RL, et al. Controlled-Release Methylphenidate Improves Attention During On-Road Driving by Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(4):235-239.  
10 Cox DJ, Merkel RL, Moore M, et al. Relative Benefits of Stimulant Therapy With OROS Methylphenidate Versus Mixed Amphetamine Salts Extended Release in Improving the Driving Performance of Adolescent Drivers With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Pediatrics. 2006;118(3):e704-e710.  
11 Cox DJ, Mikami AY, Cox BS, et al. Effect of Long-Acting OROS Methylphenidate on Routine Driving in Young Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Arch Pediat Adol Med. 2008;162(8):793-794.  
12 Berek M, Kordon A, Hargarter L, et al. Improved functionality, health related quality of life and decreased burden of disease in patients with ADHD treated with OROS® MPH: is treatment response different between children and adolescents? Child Adol Psych Men. 2011;5(1):26.  
13 Winhusen TM, Lewis DF, Riggs PD, et al. Subjective Effects, Misuse, and Adverse Effects of Osmotic-Release Methylphenidate Treatment in Adolescent Substance Abusers with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2011;21(5):455-463.  
14 Warden D, Riggs PD, Min SJ, et al. Major depression and treatment response in adolescents with ADHD and substance use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depen. 2012;120(3-Jan):214-219.  
15 Riggs PD, Winhusen T, Davies RD, et al. Randomized Controlled Trial of Osmotic-Release Methylphenidate With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Substance Use Disorders. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011;50(9):903-914.  
16 Hammerness P, Fried R, Petty C, et al. Assessment of cognitive domains during treatment with OROS methylphenidate in adolescents with ADHD. Child Neuropsychol. 2014;20(3):319-327.  
17 Newcorn JH, Nagy P, Childress AC, et al. Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Acute Comparator Trials of Lisdexamfetamine and Extended-Release Methylphenidate in Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Cns Drugs. 2017;31(11):999-1014.  
18 Rezaei G, Hosseini S, Sari AA, et al. Comparative efficacy of methylphenidate and atomoxetine in the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016;30:325.  
19 Su Y, Yang L, Stein MA, et al. Osmotic Release Oral System Methylphenidate Versus Atomoxetine for the Treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Chinese Youth: 8-Week Comparative Efficacy and 1-Year Follow-Up. J Child Adol Psychop. 2016;26(4):362-371.  
20 Wu CS, Shang CY, Lin HY, et al. Differential Treatment Effects of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Executive Functions in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2021;31(3):187-196.  
21 Deng L, Zhou P, Zhu L, et al. Methylphenidate and atomoxetine treatment negatively affect physical growth indexes of school-age children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Pharmacol Biochem Be. 2021;208:173225.  
22 Morris SSJ, Musser ED, Tenenbaum RB, et al. Methylphenidate Improves Autonomic Functioning among Youth with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022;50(5):591-603.  
23 Miyazaki K. Febrile seizure during treatment with methylphenidate. Clin Neuropsychopharmacol Ther. 2020;11(0):51-53.  
24 Karayagmurlu A, Varli AT, Coskun M. Gynecomastia: A Rare Adverse Effect of Methylphenidate in an Adolescent Boy. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020;18(2):337-339.  
25 Xu Y, Chung H, Shu M, et al. Dose titration of osmotic release oral system methylphenidate in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 2023;23(1):38.  

Would you like to clear and leave your conversation? Message history will be lost.