This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.
SUMMARY
- Janssen does not recommend the use of CARVYKTI in a manner that is inconsistent with the approved labeling.
- Richardson et al (2025)1 conducted a multicenter retrospective study that evaluated the safety and feasibility of sequential treatment with CARVYKTI in 10 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who progressed after treatment with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel).
- Mobascher et al (2025)2 presented a case report of a 59-year-old patient with RRMM who received CARVYKTI after achieving a partial but not durable remission with ide-cel.
- Pan et al (2025)3 reported a case report of a male patient in his late 50s with RRMM who was initially treated with ide-cel with progressive disease (PD) and subsequently treated with CARVYKTI to achieve complete response (CR).
- Attar et al (2023)4 presented a case series of 5 patients with RRMM and evaluated the response and toxicity profile following second chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy with CARVYKTI upon relapse after initial treatment with ide-cel.
CLINICAL DATA
Richardson et al (2025)1 conducted a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the safety and feasibility of sequential treatment with CARVYKTI in 10 heavily pretreated patients with RRMM who progressed after treatment with ide-cel.
Study Design/Methods
- The study was conducted at 3 tertiary CAR T-cell therapy centers in Germany between April 2021 and December 2024.
- All patients were treated in-label with ide-cel as the first B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR T-cell therapy product.
- The sequence of ide-cel followed by CARVYKTI was based on approval timelines and availability.
- One patient was excluded due to failure to collect T cells prior to CARVYKTI therapy.
- The decision to administer CARVYKTI was based on individual patient characteristics, disease status and was at the physician’s discretion.
- Leukapheresis was performed at disease progression after last therapy.
- TALVEY was paused ≥3 weeks before leukapheresis to protect T-cell fitness.
- Bridging therapy between apheresis and CAR T-cell infusion was allowed.
- Assessment and evaluation criteria:
- BCMA expression was confirmed using immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry.
- Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed in bone marrow with sensitivity <10⁻⁵.
- CAR T-cell expansion was measured using real-time polymerase chain reaction or flow cytometry.
- Response evaluation followed the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria.
- High-risk cytogenetics were defined per IMWG consensus.
- Patients receiving CARVYKTI were stratified by ide-cel response duration (≤12 or ≥12 months).
- The overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated.
Results
Patient Characteristics
- A total of 10 patients refractory to conventional therapies and heavily pretreated with a median of 7 (range, 5-12) prior lines of therapy (LOTs) were included in the study.
Baseline Characteristics of Treated Patients1
|
|
|---|
Sex, n
|
Female
| 4
|
Male
| 6
|
Age, median years (range)
| 63 (49-75)
|
Penta-refractory, n
| 7
|
High-risk cytogenetics, n
| 7
|
Double-hit cytogenetics, n
| 5
|
Extramedullary disease, n
| 4
|
BCMA expression, n/n
| 8/8 (2 missing)
|
Bridging therapies before CARVYKTI infusion
|
Belantamab mafodotin, n
| 1
|
TALVEY, n
| 3
|
Treatment-related, median (range)
|
Time between diagnosis and ide-cel infusion, years
| 5.8 (2.5-10)
|
PFS after ide-cel, months
| 14.9 (1.7-40.4)
|
Time between ide-cel and CARVYKTI infusion, years
| 1.9 (1.2-4)
|
Number of therapies between CAR T-cell products
| 1 (0-3)
|
CAR T-cell therapy expansion, Cmax (PCR) copies/106 WBC
| 248000 (27500-1410000)
|
Disease status at CARVYKTI infusion, n
| 4 PD, 3 SD, 2 PR, 1 VGPR
|
Feasibility & toxicity
|
Vein-to-vein ide-cel, median days (range)
| 53.5 (45-88)
|
Vein-to-vein CARVYKTI, median days (range)
| 61 (46-110)
|
CRS ide-cel, n
| I° (n=5), II° (n=5)
|
ICANS ide-cel, n
| 0
|
CRS CARVYKTI, n
| I° (n=3), II° (n=3)
|
ICANS CARVYKTI, n
| 0
|
Other neurotoxicity (trochlear palsy)
| 1
|
In-hospital ide-cel, median days (range)
| 17 (10-23)
|
In-hospital CARVYKTI, median days (range)
| 11 (0-16)
|
Abbreviations: BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; Cmax, maximum concentration in copies per WBC; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome; ide-cel, idecabtagene vicleucel; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial remission; SD, stable disease; VGPR, very good partial response; WBC, white blood cell. Note: Data points are related to CARVYKTI if not mentioned otherwise.
|
Efficacy
- Best overall response following ide-cel and subsequent CARVYKTI treatment is summarized in Table: Best Overall Response and PFS for ide-cel and CARVYKTI.
- After CARVYKTI infusion, at a median follow-up of 8.8 months, median PFS and overall survival were not reached.
- Three patients relapsed after CARVYKTI infusion, resulting in a 6-month PFS of 64.8% (95% confidence interval, 39%-100%).
- Among patients with PD, 3 out of 4 patients relapsed prior to CARVYKTI infusion.
- All 6 patients remained MRD-negative at last follow-up.
- Patients with shorter PFS following ide-cel therapy (≤12 months) experienced significantly worse outcomes after CARVYKTI infusion and all such patients relapsed within 6 months, whereas patients with longer PFS following ide-cel therapy (>12 months) had a more durable response after CARVYKTI infusion (P=0.0024).
Best Overall Response and PFS for ide-cel and CARVYKTI1
|
|
|
|---|
Overall response, %
| 100
| 100
|
≥CR
| 70
| 70
|
VGPR
| 30
| 30
|
Median PFS, months
| 14.9
| Not reached
|
Abbreviations: CR, complete response; ide-cel, idecabtagene vicleucel; PFS, progression-free survival; VGPR, very good partial response.
|
Safety
- No severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS) or immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported after either infusion.
- Hospitalization due to infections occurred in 5 patients following ide-cel and 3 patients following CARVYKTI treatment.
- After CARVYKTI infusion, 1 patient required autologous bone marrow transplantation due to grade 3 late immune effector cell–associated hematotoxicity with subsequent hematologic recovery.
- Movement or neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events were not observed.
- One patient developed trochlear palsy after CARVYKTI treatment.
- No treatment-related deaths were reported.
Mobascher et al (2025)2 reported a case of a 59-year-old patient with RRMM who received CARVYKTI after achieving a partial but not durable remission with ide-cel.
Results
Patient Characteristics and Treatments Received
- A 59-year-old patient was initially diagnosed with lambda light chain (LC) multiple myeloma (MM), and International Staging System (ISS) 1 and revised (R)-ISS 2 with highrisk cytogenetics (+1q,del[13q14]).
- Patient history is summarized by LOT, including treatment modifications, responses, and disease progression in Table: Summary of Treatment History by the LOT.
- The patient was recommended CARVYKTI as seventh-LT after lymphodepletion with fludarabine (Flu)/cyclophosphamide (Cy).
Summary of Treatment History by the LOT2
|
|
|---|
1st LOT (DSMM XIV trial)
| VRd
|
Modification during induction
| Lenalidomide replaced with cyclophosphamide due to severe skin reaction
|
Post-induction consolidation
| ASCT, pelvic surgery, radiotherapy to left acetabulum and thoracic vertebrae
|
Outcome
| Complete remission achieved by December 2016, PD by Jan 2019
|
2nd LOT
| DKd
|
Additional therapy
| Radiation therapy
|
Outcome
| Progressive osteolyses
|
3rd LOT
| DARZALEX + TALVEY
|
Outcome
| Discontinued due to nonresponsiveness
|
4th LOT
| Elotuzumab, pomalidomide, dexamethasone
|
Outcome
| Triple-class-exposed and triple-class-refractory disease
|
5th LOT
| Ide-cel
|
Outcome
| Serological PD, lambda SFLC increase
|
Lambda SFLC increase at 3 months
| From 131 to 212 mg/L
|
Lambda SFLC increase at 10 months
| From 212 mg/L to 381 mg/L
|
6th LOT
| Sel-Vd
|
Initial response
| Lambda SFLC decreased to 113 mg/L
|
Outcome
| Lambda SFLC increased to 598 mg/L; paraskeletal MM worsened in scapula and tibia
|
Additional therapy
| Re-irradiation combined with Sel-Vd as bridging therapy
|
Abbreviations: ASCT, autologous stem cell transplantation; VRd, bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone; DKd, DARZALEX + carfilzomib + dexamethasone; ide-cel, idecabtagene vicleucel; LOT, line of therapy; MM, multiple myeloma; PD, progressive disease; SFLC, serum-free light chains; Sel-Vd, selinexor + bortezomib + dexamethasone.
|
Efficacy
- As of February 2025, 13 months post CARVYKTI infusion, the patient achieved stringent CR (sCR) with unmeasurable LCs, negative immunofixation in serum and urine, no malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow, and regression of metabolic activity of the large scapula lesion.
Safety
- After CARVYKTI infusion, the patient developed grade 2 CRS that quickly improved with tocilizumab administration.
- No ICANS was reported.
- CAR T-cells persisted for 10 months with peak expansion on day (D)14 with 2704/μL of BCMACAR T-cells.
- Complete depletion of B-cells and ongoing cytopenia without the need for growth factor support (grade 2-3 thrombocytopenia, grade 1 neutropenia and anemia).
Pan et al (2025)3 reported a case of a male patient in his late 50s with RRMM who was initially treated with ide-cel with PD and subsequently treated with CARVYKTI to achieve CR.
Study Design/Methods
- Longitudinal single-cell multimodal analyses (paired RNA-seq/CITE-seq/TCR-seq) of patients’ CAR T-cell infusion products, post-infusion peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and post-infusion bone marrow biopsies.
Results
Patient Characteristics and Treatments Received
- The patient was in his late 50s with immunoglobulin G-lambda myeloma and high-risk cytogenetics. At diagnosis, he received VRd followed by tandem ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance.
- The patient achieved MRD-negative CR before eventual relapse and then received DKd, but relapsed in less than a year.
- The patient was subsequently administered ide-cel with lymphodepletion with Flu/Cy.
- Disease progression was noted following ide-cel with new hypermetabolic tumor activity in his bilateral humeri.
- Following holding therapy with pomalidomide and dexamethasone, the patient received CARVYKTI with lymphodepletion with bendamustine (due to fludarabine shortage).
Efficacy
- No response was achieved after ide-cel treatment.
- MRD-negativity (10-6 sensitivity) with CR was achieved after CARVYKTI treatment, with a significant reduction of hypermetabolic lesions in his bilateral humeri and no evidence of new lesions.
Safety
- Grade 2 CRS was reported after ide-cel treatment, and the patient received 1 dose of tocilizumab.
- After treatment with CARVYKTI, grade 1 CRS and immune effector cell–associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis-like syndrome were reported, for which he received tocilizumab and dexamethasone.
Longitudinal Single-cell Analysis
- The ide-cel infusion product was cluster of differentiation (CD)4+dominant (15% CD8+ and 85% CD4+), whereas the CARVYKTI infusion product had a more balanced ratio of CD8+ and CD4+ CAR-T cells (58% CD8+ and 42% CD4+).
- Ide-cel peak expansion occurred on D9, whereas CARVYKTI peak expansion occurred on D14.
- Despite the consistent presence of T cells, ide-cel was detected minimally at both peak and post-peak timepoints (D12, D21, D28), whereas CARVYKTI was easily detected and lasted through D21 and D28 in the peripheral blood.
- Effective infiltration in the bone marrow was detected for CARVYKTI than for ide-cel.
- CARVYKTI infusion generated CAR T-cells that resembled T resident memory (TRM) lineage.
- Post CARVYKTI infusion, CD8+ CAR T-cells continued to exhibit CAR-TRM traits.
- CARVYKTI eliminated persistent tumor and reversed bone marrow inflammation caused by ide-cel.
- The loss of natural killer cell cytotoxicity by ide-cel was recovered through CARVYKTI infusion.
Attar et al (2023)4 presented a case series of 5 patients with RRMM and evaluated the response and toxicity profile following second CAR T-cell therapy with CARVYKTI upon relapse after initial treatment with ide-cel.
Results
Patient Characteristics
- A total of 5 patients were included in the study. The baseline characteristics of patients are presented in Table: Baseline Patient Characteristics.
- All patients received CARVYKTI at the time of subsequent relapse after first CAR T-cell therapy with ide-cel.
Baseline Patient Characteristics4
|
|
|---|
Median age, years (range)
| 64 (40-76)
|
High-risk cytogenetics, n
| 2
|
Median LOTsa prior to second CAR T-cell therapy (range)
| 7 (5-8)
|
For first CAR T-cell therapy, n
|
Received investigational BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy at the recommended doses
| 3
|
Received ide-cel
| 2
|
Abbreviations: BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; ide-cel, idecabtagene vicleucel; LOT, line of treatment. aIncluding the first CAR T-cell therapy.
|
Efficacy
- After first CAR T-cell therapy with ide-cel, the ORR was 80%, with 4 patients achieving ≥VGPR (VGPR, n=2; sCR, n=2) and 1 patient with refractory disease.
- The median duration of response for responders was 16 months (range, 7-22), and median PFS was 10 months.
- Time between 2 CAR T-cell therapies ranged from 8-38 months, with all patients receiving at least 1 and up to 2 LOTs, including bridging therapy prior to treatment with CARVYKTI.
- After the second CAR T-cell therapy with CARVYKTI, the follow-up period was 3.1-11 months.
- Four out of 5 patients achieved a response (CR, n=3; PR, n=1), with a 6-month PFS of 75%.
- One patient was refractory and needed subsequent treatment. The same patient was also refractory to ide-cel.
Safety
- Grade 2 CRS was reported in 1 patient after CARVYKTI treatment.
- Hematologic toxicities reported in all patients were grade 3-4 neutropenia (n=5), grade 3 anemia (n=3), and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (n=2).
- One patient reported with prolonged grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia and required transfusions and thrombopoietin analogs.
Literature Search
A literature search of MEDLINE®, Embase®, BIOSIS Previews®, and Derwent Drug File databases (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 17 November 2025.
| 1 | Richardson T, Holtick U, Frenking JH, et al. Sequential BCMA CAR T-cell therapy in refractory multiple myeloma. Blood Adv. 2025;9:4624-4630. |
| 2 | Mobascher P, Engelhardt M, Wäsch R. Successful sequential application of CAR T-cell-therapies in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2025;104:2055-2058. |
| 3 | Pan T, Tang E, Hu Y, et al. Cilta-cel salvages ide-cel failure in relapsed multiple myeloma by driving distinct immune responses. medRxiv. 2025;2025.07.10.25331322. |
| 4 | Attar N, Cirstea D, Branagan AR, et al. Use of cilta-cel CAR T cells following previous use of a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell product in heavily treated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: a single institution case series. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):6924. |