J&J Medical Connect
CAPLYTA®

(lumateperone)

J&J Medical Connect

Connect with us

  • Products

This information is intended for US healthcare professionals to access current scientific information about J&J Innovative Medicine products. It is prepared by Medical Information and is not intended for promotional purposes, nor to provide medical advice.

CAPLYTA - Adverse Events - Extrapyramidal Symptoms

Last Updated: 03/13/2026

SUMMARY

  • In the pooled analysis of 3 randomized, doubleblind, placebocontrolled studies that assessed the safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg in the treatment of schizophrenia, extrapyramidal symptom (EPS)-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 3% of patients treated with CAPLYTA.1
  • In a 6-week, open-label (OL), switching study that assessed the short-term safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg in outpatients with stable schizophrenia who had transitioned from a prior antipsychotic therapy, EPS-related TEAEs were reported in 1% of patients, and akathisia was reported in 0.3% of patients.2
  • In a 4-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA in patients with schizophrenia, no EPS-related TEAEs occurred in ≥5% of patients in any treatment group.3
  • In a 2-week, OL, positron emission tomography (PET) study that evaluated the dopamine D2 receptor occupancy (D2RO) at plasma steady state with CAPLYTA 42 mg daily in patients with schizophrenia, no adverse events of akathisia or other EPS were reported.4
  • In three 6-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA (lumateperone 28 mg or CAPLYTA 42 mg) in patients with major depressive episodes (MDEs) associated with bipolar I or II disorder, EPS-related TEAEs were reported in ≤4% of patients treated with CAPLYTA.5-7
  • In a 6-month, open-label extension (OLE) of a phase 3 study that assessed the long-term safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg in patients with MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder, EPS-related TEAEs were reported in ≤4% of patients treated with CAPLYTA 42 mg.8
  • In a 6-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study that evaluated the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA 42 mg in patients with MDEs associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar depression with mixed features, EPS-related TEAEs were reported in 4.2% of patients treated with CAPLYTA 42 mg.9
  • In two 6-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies and one 26-week, OL study that looked at CAPLYTA 42 mg adjunctive to antidepressant therapy (ADT) in patients with MDD with inadequate response to ADT, EPS-related TEAEs were reported in ≤6.2% of patients treated with CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT, with minimal or no mean changes from baseline on the Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS).10-16

CLINICAL DATA

Schizophrenia

Kane et al (2021)1 conducted a pooled analysis of 3 randomized, double-blind, placebocontrolled studies (studies 005, 301, and 302) to assess the safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg in the treatment of schizophrenia (CAPLYTA 42 mg, n=406; risperidone 4 mg, n=255; placebo, n=412). Patients were treated with CAPLYTA once daily for 4 weeks in studies 005 and 301 and for 6 weeks in study 302. Safety was assessed at baseline, weekly (while on treatment), and at the end of the study.

  • Based on a narrow standard MedDRA query, rates of EPS-related TEAEs with CAPLYTA, placebo, and risperidone were 3%, 3.2%, and 6.3%, respectively.
    • EPS-related TEAEs reported in the CAPLYTA 42 mg group were akathisia (n=8; 2%), dystonia (n=2; 0.5%), and tardive dyskinesia (n=2; 0.5%).17 
  • Mean changes in EPS from baseline to the last on-treatment value in patients receiving CAPLYTA, risperidone, and placebo, respectively, were 0.1, 0.1, and 0 for the SAS score; -0.1, 0.1, and 0 for the BARS Total score; and 0.1, 0.1, and 0 for the AIMS score.

Correll et al (2021)2 conducted a 6-week, OL, switching study to assess the short-term safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg in outpatients with stable schizophrenia who had transitioned from a prior antipsychotic therapy (N=301). The study included a 2-week safety follow-up period during which the patients were switched back to previous or another approved antipsychotic.

  • TEAEs related to EPS were reported in 1% of the population, and akathisia was reported in 1 patient (0.3%).
  • Mean (standard deviation) changes from baseline to day 42 in BARS Total, BARS Global, AIMS Total, and SAS Total scores are summarized in Table: Changes in EPS Assessment Scales.18

Changes in EPS Assessment Scales18
Mean Change (SD) From Baseline to Day 42
CAPLYTA 42 mg
Observed Cases
(N=219)a
BARS Total score
-0.1 (0.45)
BARS Global score
0.0 (0.23)
AIMS Total score
0.0 (0.88)
SAS Total score
-0.2 (0.81)
Abbreviations: AIMS, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; BARS, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale; SAS, Simpson-Angus Scale; SD, standard deviation.
an=218 for SAS Total score.

Correll et al (2020)3 conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA in patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=150), lumateperone 28 mg (n=150), or placebo (n=149) for 4 weeks. Approximately 2 weeks after the last dose of study medication, a follow-up safety assessment was performed.


Incidence of EPS-Related TEAEs19
TEAE, n (%)
CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=150)
Lumateperone 28 mg (n=150)
Placebo (n=149)
Patients with ≥1 EPS-related TEAEa
6 (4.0)
4 (2.7)
4 (2.7)
Akathisia
6 (4.0)
2 (1.3)
4 (2.7)
Dyskinesia
0
2 (1.3)
0
Dystonia
0
0
1 (0.7)
Abbreviations: EPS, extrapyramidal symptom; MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
aEPS-related TEAEs were determined according to standard MedDRA query narrow criteria by preferred term.

Vanover et al (2019)4 conducted a 2-week, OL, PET study to evaluate the D2RO at plasma steady state with CAPLYTA 42 mg daily in the morning after at least a 2-week washout period from standard-of-care antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia (N=10).

  • There were no adverse event reports of akathisia or other EPS.

Bipolar Disorder

Correll et al (2025)5 conducted a 6-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, outpatient, multicenter study to assess the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA in patients with MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=185), lumateperone 28 mg (n=183), or placebo (n=186); the final safety follow-up visit was scheduled approximately 2 weeks after the last dose of study medication.

  • Based on a narrow standard MedDRA query, the only EPS-related TEAEs were 2 cases of akathisia: n=1 each in the lumateperone 28 mg and placebo groups.
  • Based on a broad standard MedDRA query, the number of patients with EPS-related TEAEs in the CAPLYTA 42 mg, lumateperone 28 mg, and placebo groups were 2 (1.1%), 6 (3.3%), and 2 (1.1%), respectively.
  • Changes in EPS-related scale scores are summarized in Table: Changes in EPS-Related Scale Scores from Baseline to EOT.

Changes in EPS-Related Scale Scores From Baseline to EOT20
CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=184)
Lumateperone 28 mg (n=180)
Placebo (n=185)
Mean (SD) Baseline
LS Mean Change From Baseline (SE)
P Value for Difference vs Placebo
Mean (SD) Baseline
LS Mean Change From Baseline (SE)
P Value for Difference vs Placebo
Mean (SD) Baseline
LS Mean Change From Baseline (SE)
AIMS score
0.1 (0.87)
0.01 (0.02)
0.63
0
(0.12)
0.01 (0.02)
0.59
0.1 (0.47)
-0.01 (0.02)
BARS score
0.1 (0.39)
-0.07 (0.02)
0.86
0.1 (0.66)
-0.08 (0.02)
0.95
0.1 (0.48)
-0.08 (0.02)
SAS score
0.1 (0.34)
-0.02 (0.04)
0.33
0.1 (0.44)
0.01 (0.04)
0.61
0.1 (0.28)
0.03 (0.04)
Abbreviations: AIMS, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; BARS, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale; EOT, end of treatment; EPS, extrapyramidal symptom; LS, least squares; SAS, Simpson-Angus Scale; SD, standard deviation; SE, standard error.
LS mean for change from baseline and P values are analyzed based on last observation carried forward using analysis of covariance.

Tohen et al (2025)8 conducted a 6-month OLE of a phase 3 study assessing the long-term safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg in patients with MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder (N=127).

  • Based on a broad standard MedDRA query, EPS-related TEAEs were reported in 5 patients (3.9%), with akathisia and tremor reported in 2 patients each (1.6%) and musculoskeletal stiffness reported in 1 patient (0.8%).
  • Mean (standard error) changes from baseline to day 175 or end of treatment were -0.1 (0.05) for the SAS Total score, -0.0 (0.05) for the BARS Total score, and -0.0 (0.01) for the AIMS Total score (N=116).

Suppes et al (2023)6 conducted a 6-week, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA (lumateperone 28 mg or CAPLYTA 42 mg) as adjunctive treatment to lithium or valproate in patients with MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder (CAPLYTA 42 mg, n=177; lumateperone 28 mg, n=176; placebo, n=176). In addition to weekly safety assessments, a safety assessment was also performed 2 weeks after the last study dose.

  • Based on a broad standard MedDRA query, EPS-related TEAEs reported with CAPLYTA 42 mg, lumateperone 28 mg, and placebo were 4%, 2.8%, and 2.3%, respectively.
    • According to a narrow standard MedDRA query, the only EPS-related TEAE was mild akathisia, reported in 1 patient (0.6%) in each CAPLYTA group.
  • Mean changes in EPS from baseline to the end of treatment in patients receiving CAPLYTA 42 mg, lumateperone 28 mg, and placebo, respectively, were 0, 0, and 0 for the SAS score; 0, -0.1, and -0.1 for the BARS score; and 0, 0, and 0 for the AIMS score.7 

Calabrese et al (2021)21 conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA 42 mg in patients with MDEs associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive either CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=188) or placebo (n=189) for 6 weeks; the final safety follow-up visit occurred approximately 2 weeks after the last dose of study medication.

  • No significant changes from baseline were reported in either group for BARS score, AIMS score, or SAS score.
  • One case of mild dyskinesia (0.5%) in the CAPLYTA 42 mg group was the only EPSrelated TEAE, which started on day 43 and was deemed related to CAPLYTA treatment.

Escher et al (2022)22 presented the results of an analysis of the incidence of EPS across short- and long-term studies of CAPLYTA 42 mg in patients with bipolar depression. The short-term safety population comprised 746 patients from pooled monotherapy studies (CAPLYTA 42 mg, n=372; placebo, n=374) and 352 patients from adjunctive therapy with lithium or valproate studies (adjunctive CAPLYTA 42 mg, n=177; adjunctive placebo, n=175), and the long-term OLE safety population comprised 127 patients.

  • In the short-term studies, EPS-related TEAEs reported were mild dyskinesia with CAPLYTA monotherapy (n=1; 0.3%), mild akathisia with adjunctive CAPLYTA (n=1; 0.6%), and severe akathisia with placebo in monotherapy trials (n=1; 0.3%).
  • Mean changes from baseline in the AIMS, BARS, and SAS scores were similar across groups for both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy studies.
  • In the long-term population, the EPS-related TEAE of akathisia (mild and moderate severity) was reported in 2 patients (1.6%).

Major Depressive Disorder or Bipolar Depression with Mixed Features

Durgam et al (2025)9 conducted a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA 42 mg in patients with MDEs associated with MDD or bipolar depression with mixed features. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=193) or placebo (n=195) for 6 weeks; this was followed by a 2-week safety follow-up period.

  • Based on a narrow standard MedDRA query, the only EPS-related TEAE was mild akathisia reported in 1 patient with MDD in the CAPLYTA 42 mg group.
  • Based on a broad standard MedDRA query, the incidence of EPS-related TEAEs in the combined MDD/bipolar depression population was 8 (4.2%) and 2 (1.0%) in the CAPLYTA 42 mg and placebo groups, respectively.
  • No meaningful changes from baseline were reported in either group for BARS score, AIMS score, or SAS score; see Table: Mean Change in EPS-Related Scales at EOT (Safety Population).

Mean Change in EPS-Related Scales at EOT (Safety Population)23
CAPLYTA 42 mg (n=192)
Placebo (n=193)
Mean (SD) Baseline
Mean (SD) Change From Baseline
Mean (SD) Baseline
Mean (SD) Change From Baseline
AIMS score
0.0 (0.10)
0.0 (0.31)
0.0 (0.07)
0.0 (0.23)
BARS score
0.1 (0.53)
-0.0 (0.48)
0.0 (0.28)
-0.0 (0.34)
SAS score
0.2 (0.71)
-0.0 (0.69)
0.2 (1.18)
-0.0 (0.33)
Abbreviations: AIMS, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; BARS, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale; EOT, end of treatment; EPS, extrapyramidal symptom; SAS, Simpson-Angus Scale; SD, standard deviation.
The results are for the combined major depressive disorder/bipolar depression population.

Major Depressive Disorder

Durgam et al (2025)10 conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, fixed-dose study to assess the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA 42 mg adjunctive to ADT in patients with MDD who had an inadequate response to ADT (CAPLYTA 42 mg, n=242; placebo, n=243). CAPLYTA 42 mg was administered once daily for 6 weeks; this was followed by a 1-week safety follow-up period.

  • Based on a broad standard MedDRA query, EPS-related TEAEs reported with CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT and placebo + ADT were 6.2% and 2.9%, respectively.
    • Tremor was reported in 12 patients in the CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT group and 1 patient in the placebo + ADT group.
  • Mean changes in EPS from baseline to the end of treatment in patients receiving CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT and placebo + ADT, respectively, were 0.0 and 0.0 for the SAS Total score, 0.0 and 0.0 for the BARS Total score, and 0.0 and 0.0 for the AIMS Total score.11

Durgam et al (2025)12 conducted a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, international study evaluated the efficacy and safety of CAPLYTA 42 mg adjunctive to ADT in patients with MDD who had an inadequate response to ADT (CAPLYTA 42 mg, n=242; placebo, n=238). CAPLYTA 42 mg was administered once daily for 6 weeks; this was followed by a 1-week safety follow-up period.

  • Based on a broad standard MedDRA query, EPS-related TEAEs reported with CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT and placebo + ADT were 5.4% and 0.4%, respectively.
  • Mean changes in EPS from baseline in patients receiving CAPLYTA 42 mg and placebo, respectively, were 0.0 and 0.0 for the SAS Total score, 0.0 and -0.1 for the BARS Total score, and 0.0 and 0.0 for the AIMS Total score.13

Earley et al (2025)14 presented the results of a 26-week, OL study evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg as adjunctive therapy to ADT in adult patients with MDD (N=809) who had completed study 501 or 502.


Incidence of EPS-related TEAEs and Changes From Baseline to the End of the OLTP in EPS Scores (Safety Population, Final Analysis)14,16
CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT (N=809)
Based on narrow standard MedDRA query, n (%)
Number of patients with ≥1 EPS-related TEAE
5 (0.6)
   Akathisia
3 (0.4)
   Dyskinesia
2 (0.2)
Based on broad standard MedDRA query, n (%)
Number of patients with ≥1 EPS-related TEAE
31 (3.8)
   Tremor
16 (2.0)
   Restlessness
6 (0.7)
   Akathisia
3 (0.4)
   Muscle spasms
3 (0.4)
   Dyskinesia
2 (0.2)
   Gait disturbance
2 (0.2)
   Extrapyramidal disorder
1 (0.1)
   Muscle contractions involuntary
1 (0.1)
   Bradyphrenia
1 (0.1)
   Musculoskeletal stiffness
1 (0.1)
AIMS Total scorea, mean (SD)
   Baseline
0.0 (0.37)
   Change from baseline to end of OLTP
-0.0 (0.38)
BARS Total scorea, mean (SD)
   Baseline
0.1 (0.52)
   Change from baseline to end of OLTP
-0.1 (0.53)
SAS Total scoreb, mean (SD)
   Baseline
0.1 (0.36)
   Change from baseline to end of OLTP
-0.0 (0.38)
Abbreviations: ADT, antidepressant therapy; AIMS, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; BARS, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale; EPS, extrapyramidal symptom; MedDRA, Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; OLTP, open-label treatment period; SAS, Simpson-Angus Scale; SD, standard deviation; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.
an=779. bn=778.

Kozauer et al (2024)15 presented a pooled analysis of studies 501 and 502 that evaluated the safety and tolerability of CAPLYTA 42 mg adjunctive to ADT in patients with MDD with inadequate ADT response. The pooled safety population included 964 patients (CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT, n=483; placebo + ADT, n=481).

  • No notable changes in EPS, as assessed by the AIMS, BARS, and SAS, were reported.
  • Changes in EPS, as assessed by the AIMS, BARS, and SAS, as well as EPS-related TEAEs, are summarized in Table: Extrapyramidal Symptoms.

Extrapyramidal Symptoms15
CAPLYTA 42 mg + ADT (n=483)
Placebo + ADT (n=481)
≥1 EPS-related TEAE, excluding akathisia and restlessness, n (%)
24 (5.0)
4 (0.8)
Akathisia or restlessness TEAEs, n (%)
5 (1.0)
4 (0.8)
AIMS Total score
   Mean (SD) baseline
0.1 (0.47)
0.0 (0.26)
   Mean (SD) change from baseline to EOT
-0.0 (0.47)
-0.0 (0.25)
BARS Total score
   Mean (SD) baseline
0.1 (0.46)
0.2 (0.59)
   Mean (SD) change from baseline to EOT
-0.0 (0.53)
-0.1 (0.54)
SAS Total score
   Mean (SD) baseline
0.1 (0.41)
0.1 (0.30)
   Mean (SD) change from baseline to EOT
0.0 (0.50)
-0.0 (0.28)
Abbreviations: ADT, antidepressant therapy; AIMS, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale; BARS, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale; EOT, end of treatment; EPS, extrapyramidal symptom; SAS, Simpson-Angus Scale; SD, standard deviation; TEAE, treatment-emergent adverse event.

Literature Search

A literature search of MEDLINE®, EMBASE®, BIOSIS Previews®, and DERWENT® (and/or other resources, including internal/external databases) was conducted on 11 February 2026.

 

References

1 Kane JM, Durgam S, Satlin A, et al. Safety and tolerability of lumateperone for the treatment of schizophrenia: a pooled analysis of late-phase placebo- and active-controlled clinical trials. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021;36(5):244-250.  
2 Correll CU, Vanover KE, Davis RE, et al. Safety and tolerability of lumateperone 42 mg: an open-label antipsychotic switch study in outpatients with stable schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2021;228:198-205.  
3 Correll CU, Davis RE, Weingart M, et al. Efficacy and safety of lumateperone for treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(4):349-358.  
4 Vanover KE, Davis RE, Zhou Y, et al. Dopamine D2 receptor occupancy of lumateperone (ITI-007): a Positron Emission Tomography Study in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2019;44(3):598-605.  
5 Correll C, Durgam S, Kozauer S, et al. Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2026;41(2):120-129.  
6 Suppes T, Durgam S, Kozauer SG, et al. Adjunctive lumateperone (ITI‐007) in the treatment of bipolar depression: Results from a randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trial. Bipolar Disord. 2023;25(6):478-488.  
7 Suppes T, Durgam S, Kozauer SG, et al. Supplement to: Adjunctive lumateperone (ITI-007) in the treatment of bipolar depression: results from a randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Bipolar Disord. 2023;25(6):478-488.  
8 Tohen M, Durgam S, Kozauer SG, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of lumateperone 42 mg in patients with bipolar disorder: results from a 6-month open-label extension study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2026;41(2):130-137.  
9 Durgam S, Kozauer SG, Earley WR, et al. Lumateperone for the treatment of major depressive disorder with mixed features or bipolar depression with mixed features: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025;45(2):67-75.  
10 Durgam S, Earley WR, Kozauer SG, et al. Lumateperone as adjunctive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase-3 trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2025;86(4):25m15848.  
11 Durgam S, Earley WR, Kozauer SG, et al. Supplement to: Lumateperone as adjunctive therapy in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2025;86(4):25m15848.  
12 Durgam S, Earley WR, Kozauer SG, et al. Adjunctive lumateperone in patients with major depressive disorder: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2025;182(12):1072-1082.  
13 Durgam S, Earley WR, Kozauer SG, et al. Supplement to: Adjunctive Lumateperone in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2025;182(12):1072-1082.  
14 Data on File. CAPLYTA. Final Clinical Study Report of Study 503. Intra-Cellular Therapies, Inc; 2025.  
15 Kozauer SG, Durgam S, Earley WR, et al. Safety and tolerability of lumateperone 42 mg for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 2 randomized placebo-controlled trials. Poster presented at: The 63rd Annual Meeting of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP); December 8-11, 2024; Phoenix, AZ.  
16 Earley WR, Durgam S, Kozauer SG, et al. Long-term adjunctive lumateperone treatment in major depressive disorder: results from a six-month open-label extension study. Poster presented at: American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology (ASCP) Annual Meeting; May 27-30, 2025; Scottsdale, AZ.  
17 Kane JM, Durgam S, Satlin A, et al. Supplement to: Safety and tolerability of lumateperone for the treatment of schizophrenia: a pooled analysis of late-phase placebo- and active-controlled clinical trials. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021;365(5):244-250.  
18 Correll CU, Vanover KE, Davis RE, et al. Supplement to: Safety and tolerability of lumateperone 42 mg: an open-label antipsychotic switch study in outpatients with stable schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2021;228:198-205.  
19 Correll CU, Davis RE, Weingart M, et al. Supplement to: Efficacy and safety of lumateperone for treatment of schizophrenia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2020;77(4):349-358.  
20 Correll CU, Durgam S, Kozauer SG, et al. Supplement to: Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2026;41(2):120-129.  
21 Calabrese JR, Durgam S, Satlin A, et al. Efficacy and safety of lumateperone for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2021;178(12):1098-1106.  
22 Escher T, Durgam S, Kozauer SG, et al. Lumateperone in the treatment of major depressive episodes associated with bipolar I or bipolar II disorder: evaluation of extrapyramidal and motor symptoms in late-phase clinical trials [abstract]. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(Suppl. 1):202-203. Abstract P243.  
23 Durgam S, Kozauer SG, Earley WR, et al. Supplement to: Lumateperone for the treatment of major depressive disorder with mixed features or bipolar depression with mixed features: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2025;45(2):67-75.